A sample of 138 students was assessed for their computer attitudes using a Likert-type questionnaire with three subscales: Computer Importance, Computer Enjoyment, and Computer Anxiety. An overall positive attitude towards computers was found. Multivariate analysis of variance revealed no significant differences in computer attitudes by gender although male students reported more positive attitudes towards computers than female students. Implications for educators include managing the perceptions of students that the computers are useful for learning purposes, in addition to using them for leisure and entertainment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AjzenL.FishbeinM. (1977) Attitude-behavior relations: a theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888–918.
2.
Al-KhaldiM. A.Al-JabriI. M. (1998) The relationship of attitudes to computer utilization: new evidence from a developing nation. Computers in Human Behavior, 14, 23–42.
3.
ArmitageD. (1993) Where arc the girls? Increasing female participation in computer, math, and science education. In CareyD.CareyR.WillisD. A.WillisJ. (Eds.), Technology and teacher education annual. From Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Technology and Technology Education. Charlottesville, VA: Association for Advancement of Computing in Education. Pp. 14–18.
4.
BeckersJ. J.SchmidtH. G. (2001) The structure of computer anxiety: a six-factor model. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 35–49.
5.
BozionelosN. (2001) Computer anxiety: relationship with computer experience and prevalence. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 213–224.
6.
CampbellN. J. (1990) High school students' computer attitudes and attributions: gender and ethnic differences. Journal of Adolescent Research, 5, 485–499.
7.
CleggS.TrayhurnD. (2000) Gender and computing: not the same old problem. British Educational Research Journal, 26(1), 75–90.
8.
CulleyL. (1988) Option choices and careers guidance: gender and computing in secondary schools. British Journal of Counselling and Guidance, 16, 72–82.
9.
DavisF. O.BagozziR. P.WarshawP. R. (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 983–1003.
10.
DavisS.WiedenbeckS. (2001) The mediating effects of intrinsic motivation, case of use and usefulness perceptions on performance in first-time and subsequent computer users. Interacting with Computers, 13, 549–580.
11.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1987) The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1024–1037.
12.
GarlandK. J.NoyesJ. M. (2004) Computer experience: a poor predictor of computer attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 823–840.
13.
GefenD.StraubD. W. (1997) Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail: an extension to the Technology Acceptance Model. MIS Quarterly, 21(4), 389–400.
14.
GlassC. R.KnightL. A. (1988) Cognitive factors in computer anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 12, 351–365.
15.
HoutzL. E.GuptaU. G. (2001) Nebraska high school students' computer skills and attitudes. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 3 3, 316–325.
16.
KnezekG. R.ChristensenR.MiyashitaK. (1998) Instruments for assessing attitudes toward information technology. Denton, TX: Texas Center for Educational Technology.
