One group of 10 male albino rats was given partial reinforcement while the other 10 rats received continuous reinforcement in a straight alley. Subjects then experienced five consecutive stages of Extinction 1, Continuous Reinforcement 1, Extinction 2, Continuous Reinforcement 2, and finally, Extinction 3. Analysis showed the partial reinforcement effect in extinction was sustained over two stages of extinction and two stages of continuous reinforcement, since subjects receiving partial reinforcement ran faster than rats given continuous reinforcement throughout all three of the extinction periods. The results seem to support those of Amsel's (1967) and Capaldi's (1967) theoretical formulations of the partial reinforcement effect in extinction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AkhtarM.RangoonwalaR. A. (1969) Extinction of a free-operant as a function of incentive quality and partial reinforcement. Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 4(Pt. 1), 89–90.
2.
AmselA. (1967) Partial reinforcement effects on vigor and persistence: advances in frustration theory derived from a variety of within-subject experiments. In SpenceK. W.SpenceJ. T. (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation. Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 1–65.
3.
AmselA.SurridgeC. R.HugJ. (1969) Number of food pellets and the partial reinforcement extinction effect after extended acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 82, 578–580.
4.
AmselA.WongP. T. P.TraupmannK. L. (1961) Short-term and long-term factors in extinction and durable persistence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 90–95.
5.
BarronR. F. (1967) Transfer of the partial reinforcement extinction effect across tasks in normal and retarded boys. Dissertation Abstracts international, 27(11-B), 4118.
6.
CalefR. S.ChobanM. C.GlenneyK. R.CalefR. A.MaceF. M.CummingsT. D. (2004) Effects of preshift small magnitude of reward received during goalbox placements on the negative contrast effect. Psychological Reports, 94, 683–686.
7.
CapaldiF. J. (1967) A sequential hypothesis of instrumental learning. In SpenceK. W.SpenceJ. T. (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation. Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 67–152.
8.
GonzalezR. C.BittermanM. E. (1967) Partial reinforcement effect in the goldfish as a function of amount of reward. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 64, 163–167.
9.
FewisD. J.DuncanC. P. (1961) Effects of variable magnitude of reward on a lever-pulling response. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 203–205.
10.
MikulkaP. J.PavlikW. B. (1966) Deprivation level, competing responses, and the partial reinforcement effect. Psychological Reports, 18, 95–102.
11.
O'ConnellD. C.WagnerM. V. (1967) Extinction after partial reinforcement and minimal learning as a test of both verbal control and PRE in concept learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 151–153.
12.
ShanabM. F.BirnbaumD. W. (1974) Durability of the partial reinforcement and partial delay of reinforcement extinction effects after minimal acquisition training. Animal Learning & Behavior, 2, 81–85.
13.
SilversteinA. (1967) Unlearning, spontaneous recovery, and the partial reinforcement effect in paired-associated learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73, 15–21.
14.
SpearN. F.SpitznerJ. H. (1967) PRE in a T-maze brightness discrimination within and between subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73, 320–322.
15.
SurridgeC. T.MockK. R.AmselA. (1968) Effect of interpolated extinction after partial delay of reward training on subsequent reacquisition and extinction. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 321–328.
16.
TheoisJ. (1962) The partial reinforcement effect sustained through blocks of continuous reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 1–6.
17.
TraupmannK. F.WongP. T. P.AmselA. (1971) Durability of persistence as a function of number of partially reinforced trials. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 372–375.
18.
WongP. T.LeeC. T.NovierF. H. (1971) The partial reinforcement effect (PRE) sustained through extinction and continuous reinforcement in two strains of inbred mice. Psychonomic Science, 22, 141–143.
