Reply to Fudin's (1993B) Comments on Hudesman and Page's Response to Fudin's (1993A) Comments on Hudesman,Page,and Rautiainen's Subliminal Psychodynamic Activation Experiment
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 1993
Reply to Fudin's (1993B) Comments on Hudesman and Page's Response to Fudin's (1993A) Comments on Hudesman,Page,and Rautiainen's Subliminal Psychodynamic Activation Experiment
Fudin (1993b) raises two methodological concerns that he believes limit the usefulness of the results obtained by Hudesman, Page, and Rautiainen (1992). We have again attempted to address Fudin's concerns. The authors believe that the conclusions presented are appropriate to the procedure and results.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CUNY Skills Assessment Test. (1978) New York: City Univer. of New York.
2.
FudinR. (1986) Subliminal psychodynamic activation: Mommy and I are not yet one. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63, 1159–1179.
3.
FudinR. (1993a) Comments on Hudesman and Page's reply to Fudin's comments on Hudesman, Page, and Rautiainen's subliminal psychodynamic activation experiment. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76, 856–858.
4.
FudinR. (1993b) Comments on Hudesman, Page and Rautiainen's (1992) subliminal psychodynamic activation experiment. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 74, 41–42.
5.
GustafsonR.KällménH. (1991) Subliminal psychodynamic activation: An experiment controlling for major possible confounding influences outlined by Fudin. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 73, 163–171.
6.
HudesmanJ.PageW. (1993) Reply to Fudin's comments on Hudesman, Page and Rautiainen's experiment on the use of subliminal psychodynamic activation to enhance learning mathematics. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76, 733–734.
7.
HudesmanJ.PageW.RautiainenJ. (1992) Use of subliminal stimulation to enhance learning mathematics. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 74, 1219–1224.
