Two criticisms of Coppage and Payne (1981) were offered by Frith and Eysenck (this issue). The first was refuted on empirical grounds. The second suggested their disregard of die logic of our experiment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CoppageS. J., & PayneR. B.An experimental test of current theories of psychomotor reminiscence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1981, 52, 343–352.
2.
EysenckH. J., & FrithC. D.Reminiscence, motivation, and personality. New York: Plenum, 1977.
3.
FrithC. D., & EysenckH. J.Reminiscence—psychomotor learning: A reply to Coppage and Payne. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1981, 53, 842.
