Some methodological and theoretical criticisms of the writer's studies of reversible perspective have been made by Sadler and Mefferd (1970). These criticisms are examined, and some errors corrected.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsP. A.HaireM.Structural and conceptual factors in the perception of double-cube figures. American Journal of Psychology, 1958, 71, 548–556.
2.
AdamsP. A.HaireM.The effect of orientation on the reversal of one cube inscribed in another. American Journal of Psychology, 1959, 72, 296–299.
3.
HowardI.An investigation of a satiation process in the reversible perspective of revolving skeletal shapes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961, 13, 19–33.
4.
KoehlerW.WallachH.Figural after-effects: An investigation of visual processes. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 1944, 88, 269–357.
5.
PriceJ. R.Perspective duration of a plane reversible figure. Psychonomic Science, 1967, 9, 623–624. (a)
6.
PriceJ. R.Two components of reversal rate for a rotating skeletal cube: “conditioned satiation.”Australian Journal of Psychology, 1967, 19, 261–270. (b)
7.
PriceJ. R.Apparent reversals and orientation of a rotating skeletal cube. Studia Psychologica (Bratislava), 1969, 11, 232–235. (a)
8.
PriceJ. R.Effect of extended observation on reversible perspective duration. Psychonomic Science, 1969, 16, 75–76. (b)
9.
PriceJ. R.Studies of reversible perspective: A methodological review. Behaviour Research Methods and Instrumentation, 1969, 1, 102–106. (c)
10.
PriceJ. R.The effect of complexity on the perspective duration of plane reversible figures. Studia Psychologica (Bratislava), 1971, in press.
11.
SadlerT. G.MefferdR. B.Fluctuations of perceptual organization and orientation: Stochastic (random) or steady state (satiation)?Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1970, 31, 739–749.
12.
SmithD. E. P.RaygorA. L.Verbal satiation and personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1956, 52, 323–326.
