Inefficient use of data is noted as a difficulty with experimental matching of Ss in addition to those cited by previous authors. Analysis of covariance is shown to circumvent experimental matching problems with varying degrees of effectiveness depending on usage. Observation of experimental effects both with and without covariate adjustments is suggested as a maximally effective procedure.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CantorG. N.RyanT. J.Retention of verbal paired associates in normals and retardates. Amer. J. ment. Defic., 1962, 66, 861–865.
2.
GirardeauF. L.EllisN. R.Rote verbal learning by normal and mentally retarded children. Amer. J. ment. Defic., 1964, 68, 525–532.
3.
PrehmH. J.Verbal learning research in mental retardation. Amer. J. ment. Defic., 1966, 71, 42–47.
4.
PrehmH. J.Rote verbal learning and memory in the retarded. In PrehmH. J.HamerlynckL. A.CrossonJ. E. (Eds.), Behavioral research in mental retardation. Eugene, Ore.: Univer. of Oregon Rehabilitation Research and Training Center in Mental Retardation, 1968. Pp. 31–43.
5.
RingE. M.PalermoD. S.Paired associate learning of retarded and normal children. Amer. J. ment. Defic., 1961, 66, 100–107.
6.
StanleyJ. C.BeemanE. Y.Restricted generalization, bias, and loss of power that may result from matching groups. Psychol. Newsltr, N. Y. Univer., 1958, 9, 88–102.
7.
UnderwoodB. J.Psychological research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1957.
