The results of previous studies on the factorial structure of Wechsler Intelligence Scales are somewhat inconsistent across normal and pathological samples. To study specific clinical groups, such as developmentally disabled persons, it is useful to examine the factor structure in appropriate samples. A factor analysis was carried out using the principal component method and the Varimax orthogonal rotation on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-R) in a sample of 203 developmentally disabled persons, with a mean age of 25 years 4 months. Developmental disability ranged from mild to moderate. Partially contrasting with previous studies on normal samples, results found a two-factor solution. Wechsler's traditional Verbal and Performance scales seems to be more appropriate for this sample than the alternative three-factor solution.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenS. R.ThorndikeR. M. (1995) Stability of the WAIS and WISC-III factor structure using cross-validation of covariance structures. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 648–657.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV-TR). (4th ed., Rev.) Washington, DC: Author.
3.
AtkinsonL.CyrJ. J. (1984) Factor analysis of the WAIS-R: psychiatric and standardization sample. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 714–716.
4.
BeckN. C.TuckerD.FrankR.ParkerJ.LakeR.ThomasS.LichtyW.HorwitzE.HorwitzB.MerrittF. (1989) The latent factor structure of the WAIS-R: a factor analysis of individual item responses. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45, 281–293.
5.
BlahaJ. E.WallbrownF. H. (1982) Hierarchical factor structure of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 652–660.
6.
CanavanA. G. M.BeckmanJ. (1993) Deriving principal component IQ scores from the WAIS-R. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32, 81–86.
7.
CrawfordJ. R.AllanK. M.StephenD. W.ParkerD. M.BessonJ. A. O. (1989) The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R): factor structure in a U.K. sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 1209–1212.
8.
CrawfordJ. R.JackA. M.MorrisonF. M.AllanK. M.NelsonH. E. (1990) The U.K. factor structure of the WAIS-R is robust and highly congruent with USA standardization sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 643–644.
GearyD. C.WhitworthR. H. (1988) Dimensional structure of the WAIS-R: a simultaneous multi-sample analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 945–956.
11.
GroffM.HubbleL. M. (1982) WISC-R factor structures of younger and older youth with low IQs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 148–149.
12.
GutkinT. B.ReynoldsC. R.GalvinG. A. (1984) Factor analysis of the WAIS-R: an examination of the standardization sample. Journal of School Psychology, 22, 83–93.
13.
HillT. D.ReddonG. R.JacksonD. N. (1985) The factor structure of the Wechsler Scales: a brief review. Clinical Psychology Review, 5, 287–306.
14.
KaufmanA. S. (1975) Factor analysis of the WISC-R at 11 levels between 6 1/2 and 16 1/2 years. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 135–147.
15.
KaufmanA. S.McLeanJ. E.ReynoldsC. R. (1991) Analysis of the WAIS-R factor patterns by sex and race. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47, 549–557.
16.
LaicardiC.FrustaciA.LauriolaA. (1996) Factor structure of the WAIS-R Italian version compared with American and British results. Psychological Reports, 79, 1171–1177.
17.
LeckliterI. N.MatarazzoJ. D.SilversteinA. B. (1986) A literature review of factor analytic studies of the WAIS-R. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42, 332–342.
18.
O'GradyK. E. A. (1983) Confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis of the WAIS-R. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 826–831.
19.
OrsiniA.LaicardiC. (1997) WAIS-R. Contributo alla Taratura Italiana. Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.
20.
ParkerK. (1983) Factor analysis of the WAIS-R at nine age levels between 16 and 74 years. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 302–308.
21.
SiegertR. J.PattenM. D.TaylorA. J. W.McCormickL. A. (1988) Factor analysis of the WAIS-R using the factor replication procedure, FACTOREP. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 481–489.
22.
SilversteinA. B. (1982) Factor structure of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 661–664.
23.
SilversteinA. B. (1985) Cluster analysis of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41, 98–100.
24.
StewartK. J.MoelyB. E. (1983) The WISC-R third factor: what does it mean?Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 928–929.
25.
SwassingR. (1979) A hierarchical analysis of the WAIS performance of adolescent retardates. Journal of Experimental Education, 47, 179–181.
26.
Van der HeijdenP.DondersJ. (2003) A confirmatory factor analysis of the WAIS-III in patients with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 25, 59–65.
27.
VernonP. E. (1950) The structure of human abilities. London: Methuen.
28.
WallbrownF. H.BlahaJ.WallbrownJ. D.EnginA. W. (1975) The hierarchical factor structure of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. Journal of Psychology, 89, 223–235.
29.
WallerN. G.WaldmanI. D. (1990) A reexamination of the WAIS-R factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 2, 139–144.
30.
WechslerD. (1974) Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York: The Psychological Corp.
31.
WechslerD. (1981) Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. New York: The Psychological Corp.
