51 students and 20 experts judged 20 behaviors which might be considered to be suicide in a similar fashion with the exception that the experts were less likely to see a dog who refuses to eat and dies as a suicide. Applying models proposed for how people categorize objects, it is argued that both experts and lay people use a prototypical approach rather than a feature comparison approach for defining suicide.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abdel-KhalekA. M. (2004) Neither altruistic suicide, nor terrorism but martyrdom. Archives of Suicide Research, 8, 99–113.
2.
GoldsteinK. (1940) Human nature in the light of psychopathology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univer. Press.
3.
JobesD. A.CaseyJ. O.BermanA. L., & WrightD. G. (1991) Empirical criteria for the determination of suicide manner of death. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 36, 244–256.
4.
LynchS. J.ColeyJ. D., & MedinD. L. (2000) Tall is typical. Memory & Cognition, 28, 41–50.
5.
MatlinM. W. (2008) Cognition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
6.
MenningerK. (1938) Man against himself. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
7.
O'CarrollP. W.BermanA. L.MarisR. W.MosickiE. K.TanneyB. L., & SilvermanM. M. (1996) Beyond the Tower of Babel: a nomenclature for suicidology. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 26, 237–252.
8.
RosenbergM. L.DavidsonL. E.SmithJ. C.BermanA. L.BuzbeeH.GantnerG.GayG. A.Moore-LewisB.MillsD. H.MurrayD.O'CarrollP. W., & JobesD. (1988) Operational criteria for the determination of suicide. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 32, 1445–1455.
9.
SilvermanM. M.BermanA. L.SanddalN. D.O'CarrollP. W., & JoinerT. E. (2007) Rebuilding the Tower of Babel. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 37, 248–263.
10.
WassermanD., & WassermanC. (Eds.) (2009) Oxford textbook of suicidology and suicide prevention. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univer. Press.
11.
WolfgangM. E. (1959) Suicide by means of victim-precipitated homicide. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Psychopathology, 20, 335–349.