The current study examined uses of the Internet among college students classified as addicted to the Internet or not. Data were gathered from 384 college students. Students classified as Internet Addicted used the Internet more for social functions, leisure functions, and virtual emotional functions, when compared to students considered as Internet Nonaddicted. Effect sizes were large, indicating important group differences in uses of the Internet.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual for mental disorders. (4th ed.) Washington, DC: Author.
2.
AndersonK. J. (2001) Internet use among college students: an exploratory study. Journal of American College Health, 50, 21–26.
3.
ArmstrongL.PhillipsJ. G., & SalingL. L. (2000) Potential determinants of heavier Internet usage. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53, 537–550.
4.
BayraktarF., & GunZ. (2007) Incidence and correlates of Internet usage among adolescents in North Cyprus. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 191–197.
5.
BeardK. W. (2002) Internet addiction: current status and implications for employees. Journal of Employment Counseling, 39, 2–11.
6.
BeardK. W., & WolfE. M. (2001) Modification in the proposed diagnostic criteria for Internet addiction. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4, 377–383.
7.
BurbaF. J.PetroskoJ. M., & BoyleM. A. (2001) Appropriate and inappropriate instructional behaviors for international training. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12, 267–283.
8.
CardenR., & RettewS. (2006) Internet chat room use, satisfaction with life, and loneliness. Psychological Reports, 98, 121–122.
9.
CeyhanA. A., & CeyhanE. (2008) Loneliness, depression, and computer self-efficacy as predictors of problematic Internet use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 699–701.
10.
ChakK., & LeungL. (2004) Shyness and locus of control as predictors of Internet addiction and Internet use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7, 559–570.
11.
ChouC., & HsiaoM. C. (2000) Internet addiction, usage, gratifications, and pleasure experience: the Taiwan college students' case. Computers & Education, 35, 65–80.
12.
CohenJ. (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13.
EngelbergE., & SjobergL. (2004) Internet use, social skills, and adjustment. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7, 41–47.
14.
FieldA. (2002) Discovering statistics using SPSS. London, UK: Sage Publications.
15.
GhassemzadehL.ShahrarayM., & MoradiA. (2008) Prevalence of Internet addiction and comparison of Internet addicts and non-addicts in Iranian high school. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 731–733.
16.
GriffithsM. D. (2000a) Does Internet and computer “addiction” exist? Some case study evidence. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3, 211–218.
17.
GriffithsM. D. (2000b) Internet addiction: time to be taken seriously?Addiction Research, 8, 413–418.
18.
HairJ. E.AndersonR. E.TathamR. L., & BlackW. C. (1998) Multivariate data analysis. (5th ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19.
JohanssonA., & GötestamK. G. (2004) Problems with computer games without monetary reward: similarity to pathological gambling. Psychological Reports, 95, 227–231.
20.
JuM. H. (2000) Research on personal characteristics, the behavior of using Internet and Internet addiction for Taiwanese college study. Unpublished master's thesis, Taiwan.
21.
LavancoG.CataniaV.MilioA., & RomanoF. (2008) Learning and relationships in the cyberspace. Proceedings of the World Academy of Science, Engineering, and Technology, 28, 473–477.
22.
LiS. M., & ChungT. M. (2006) Internet function and Internet addictive behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 1067–1071.
23.
PapacharissiZ., & RubinA. M. (2000) Predictors of Internet usage. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 44, 175–196.
24.
SchererK. (1997) College life on-line: healthy and unhealthy Internet use. Journal of College Student Development, 38, 655–665.
25.
ShawL. H., & GantL. M. (2002) In defense of the Internet: the relationship between Internet communication and depression, loneliness, self-esteem, and perceived social support. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5, 157–171.
26.
SmithT. B., & ShwalbD. A. (2007) Preliminary examination of international students' adjustment and loneliness related to electronic communications. Psychological Reports, 100, 167–170.
27.
TahirogluA. Y.CelikG. G.UzelM.OzcanN., & AvciA. (2008) Internet use among Turkish adolescents. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 537–543.
28.
TsaiC., & LinS. S. (2003) Internet addiction of adolescents in Taiwan: an interview study. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6, 649–652.
29.
WeiserE. B. (2001) The functions of Internet use and their social and psychological consequences. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4, 723–743.
30.
WidyantoL., & McMurranM. (2004) The psychometric properties of the Internet Addiction Test. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7, 433–450.
31.
YangS. C., & TungC. J. (2007) Comparison of Internet addicts and non-addicts in Taiwanese high school. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 79–96.
32.
YoungK. S. (1998) Internet addiction: the emergence of a new disorder. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1, 237–244.
33.
YoungK. S., & RogersR. C. (1998) Internet addiction: personality traits associated with its development. Paper presented at the 69th Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Boston, MA.
34.
YurdagülH. & AkşarP. (2008) An investigation of the factorial structures of pupils' attitude towards technology (PATT): a Turkish sample. Elementary Education Online, 7, 288–309.
