The implications of temporal distance on motivation-related concepts were examined. The results of an experiment, based on 585 Grade 6 students, indicated that both positive (approach) and negative (avoidance) motivation increased as the future goal or event approached in time. This increase in approach and avoidance motivation influenced the performance of the pupils differently. For pupils with success orientation, the performance increased. For pupils with failure orientation, the performance remained about the same.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AikenL. S., & WestS. G. (1991) Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
AinslieG. (1992) Picoeconomics: the strategic interaction of successive motivational states within the person.New York: Cambridge Univer. Press.
3.
AinslieG., & HaslamN. (1992) Hyperbolic discounting. In LoewensteinG. & ElsterJ. (Eds.), Choice over time.New York: Russell Sage. Pp. 57–92.
4.
AtkinsonJ. W. (1957) Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359–372.
5.
AtkinsonJ. W. (1964) Introduction to motivation.New York: Van Nostrand.
6.
BaronR., & KennyD. (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
7.
BjørnebekkG. (2007) Reinforcement sensitivity theory and major motivational and self-regulatory processes in children. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1980–1990.
8.
BjørnebekkG. (2008) Positive and negative affect as modulators of cognition and motivation: the rediscovery of affect in achievement theory. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52, 153–170.
9.
BjørnebekkG. (2009) An investigation of possible mediators and moderators of the approach and avoidance–performance relationship: theoretical and experimental aspects. In KarabenickS. A.NenningerP.EfklidesA., & WosnitzaM. (Eds.), Contemporary motivation research: from global to local perspectives.Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.
10.
BjørnebekkG. (in press) Psychometric properties of the scores on the Behavioral Inhibition and Activation Scales in a sample of Norwegian children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, doi:10.1177/0013164408323239.
11.
BrownJ. S. (1948) Gradients of approach and avoidance responses and their relations to level of motivation. Journal of Comparative Physiological Psychology, 41, 450–465.
12.
ChristophersenK-A., & RandP. (1982) Factor structure of the Achievement Motives Scale (AMS): two factors–two samples. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 26, 13–28.
13.
ElliotA. J. (1999) Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169–189.
14.
ElliotA. J. (2006) The hierarchical model of approach-avoidance motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 111–116.
15.
GjesmeT. (1974) Goal distance in time and its effects on the relation between achievement motives and performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 8, 161–171.
16.
GjesmeT. (1975) Slope of gradients for performance as a function of achievement motive, goal distance in time, and future time orientation. Journal of Psychology, 91, 143–160.
17.
GjesmeT. (1979) Future time orientation as a function of achievement motives, ability, delay of gratification, and sex. Journal of Psychology, 101, 173–188.
18.
GjesmeT. (1983a) Motivation to approach success (Ts) and motivation to avoid failure (Tf). Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 27, 145–164.
19.
GjesmeT. (1983b) On the concept of future-time orientation: considerations of some functions and measurements implications. International Journal of Psychology, 18(5), 443–462.
20.
GjesmeT. (1996) Future-time orientation and motivation. In GjesmeT. & NygårdR. (Eds.), Advances in motivation.Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian Univer. Press.
21.
GjesmeT., & NygårdR. (1970) Achievement related motives: theoretical considerations and construction of a measuring instrument. Unpublished report, Univer. of Oslo, Norway.
22.
HalvariH. (1991) Effects of goal distance in time on relation between achievement motives and energy consumption by aerobic processes during 1500 m running. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72, 1143–1165.
23.
HalvariH. (1997) Moderator effects of age on the relation between achievement motives and performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 303–318.
24.
HalvariH., & GjesmeT. (1995) Trait and state anxiety before and after competitive performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81, 1059–1074.
25.
KonecniV. J. (1979) Determinants of aesthetic preference and effects of exposure to aesthetic stimuli: social, emotional, and cognitive factors. In MaherB. A. (Ed.), Progress in experimental personality research.Vol. 9. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 149–197.
26.
KuhlJ. (1982) The expectancy-value approach within the theory of social motivation: elaborations, extensions, critique. In FeatherN. T. (Ed.), Expectations and actions: expectancy-value models in psychology.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 125–171.
27.
KuhlJ., & BeckmannJ. (1994) Volition and personality: action versus state orientation.Götingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
28.
LewinK. (1935) A dynamic theory of personality: selected papers.New York: McGraw-Hill.
29.
MillerN. E. (1944) Experimental studies of conflict. In HuntJ. McV. (Ed.), Personality and the behavior disorders.Vol. 1. New York: Ronald Press.
30.
MillerN. E., & MurrayE. J. (1952) Displacement and conflict: learnable drive as a basis for a steeper gradient of avoidance than of approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 227–231.
31.
NygårdR. (1975) A reconsideration of the achievement motivation theory. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 61–92.
32.
NygårdR. (1977) Personality, situation and persistence: a study with emphasis on achievement motivation.Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
33.
NygårdR., & GjesmeT. (1973) Assessment of achievement motives: comments and suggestions. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 17, 39–46.
RandP. (1978) Some validation data for the Achievement Motives Scale (AMS). Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 22, 155–171.
36.
RaynorJ. O. (1974) Relationships between achievement-related motives, future orientation, and academic performance. In AtkinsonJ. W. & RaynorJ. O. (Eds.), Motivation and achievement.Washington, DC: Winston & Sons.
37.
ThomassenT. O.HalvariH., & GjesmeT. (2001) Experimentally induced effects of goal distance in time on the relations between achievement motives, future time orientation and indication of performance in sport. In EfklidesA.KuhlJ., & SorrentinoR. (Eds.), Trends and prospects in motivation research.Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic.
38.
ThrashT. M.ElliotA. J., & SchultheissO. C. (2007) Methodological and dispositional predictors of congruence between implicit and explicit need for achievement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 961–974.
