Violent crime, especially by youth, is an increasing and costly problem. Zagar and colleagues have described five empirical studies in which youths' and adults' risks were identified and used to predict commission of homicide. The samples were more representative of the most violent modern urban delinquents than samples in previous research from smaller cities. From Zagar and colleagues' results, it is clear that the use of actuarial personality and probation–parole tests to identify at-risk individuals and target treatments to their needs would allow organizations to reduce loss of life and improve quality of life and economic and social well-being. The current article first provides a brief review of the situations in which the courts already accept the use of actuarial personality and probation-parole tests. Following that are several representations of the costs and benefits of broader application of testing and treatment in schools, universities, and workplaces. Finally, a specific proposal for generalized screening is proposed in a city of 3 million, with estimates of lives saved and costs reduced.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AckermanM. J. (1999) Essentials of forensic psychological assessment.New York: Wiley.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (1987) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders revised. (3rd ed.) Washington, DC: Author.
3.
AnastasiA. (1988) Psychological testing. New York: Macmillan.
4.
BontaJ.LawM.HansonK. (1998) The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 123–142.
5.
BrookoffD.O'BrienK. K.CookC. S.ThompsonT. D.WilliamsC. (1997) Characteristics of participants in workplace violence. Journal of the American Medical Association, 277, 1369–1373.
6.
BurgessA. W.HartmanC. R.ResslerR. K.DouglasJ. E.McCormackA. (1986) Sexual homicide: a motivational model. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1, 251–272.
7.
BurgessE. W. (1928) Factors making for success or failure on parole. In BruceA. A.BurgessE. W.HarnoA. J., & LandescoJ. (Eds.), The workings of the indeterminate sentence law and the parole system in Illinois.Springfield, IL: State Board of Parole.
8.
BuschK. G.ZagarR. J.GroveW. M.HughesJ. R.ArbitJ.BussellR. E.BartikowskiB. (2009) Looking forward in records of young adults convicted of sexual homicide, rape, or molestation as youth: risks for reoffending. Psychological Reports, 104, 155–184.
Centers For Disease Control And Prevention. (1996) Surveillance-summaries: youth risk behavior. Morbidity, Mortality Weekly Report, 45, SS-4.
11.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2001) Temporal variation in school-associated student homicide and suicide events U.S. 1992-1999. Morbidity, Mortality Weekly Report, 50, 657–660.
12.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2003) Source of firearms used by students in school-associated violent deaths U.S. 1992-1999. Morbidity, Mortality Weekly Report, 52, 169–172.
13.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2008) School-associated student homicides U.S. 1992-2006. Morbidity, Mortality Weekly Report, 51, 33–36.
14.
DahleK. P. (2006) Strengths and limitations of actuarial prediction of criminal reoffence in a German prison sample. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 29, 431–442.
15.
DaroD. (1998) Confronting child abuse: research for effective program design.New York: Free Press.
16.
DonohueJ. J.SiegelmanP. (1998) Allocating resources among prisons and social programs in the battle against crime. Journal of Legal Studies, 27, 1–44.
17.
EllicksonP. L.McGuiganK. A. (2000) Early predictors of adolescent violence. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 566–572.
18.
ElliottD. S. (2001) Blueprints for violence prevention.Boulder, CO: Univer. of Colorado at Boulder, Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence. Also available online at http://www.colorado.edu/cspv/blueprints.
19.
EmeryR. E.OttoR. K.O'DonohueW. T. (2005) A critical assessment of child custody evaluations: limited science and a flawed system. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6, 1–29.
20.
European Union. (2005) The European Union Constitution.Denmark: Jens-Peter Bonde.
21.
FarringtonD. (1997) Early prediction of violent youth. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 5, 51–66.
22.
FeldhausK. M.Kosiol-McLainJ.AmsburyH. L.NortonI. M.LowensteinS. R.AbbottJ. T. (1997) Accuracy of 3 brief screening questions for detecting partner violence in the emergency department. Journal of the American Medical Association, 277, 1357–1361.
23.
GivenJ. B. (1977) Society and homicide in thirteenth-century England.Stanford, CA: Stanford Univer. Press.
24.
GormanD. M. (1998) The irrelevance of evidence in development of school-based drug prevention policy. Evaluation Review, 22, 118–146.
25.
GrannM.LångströmN. (2007) Actuarial assessment of violence risk: Sweden. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 22–36.
26.
GroveW.MeehlP. (1996) Comparative efficiency of informal and formal prediction procedures: the clinical-statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 293–399.
27.
HarveyM. R. (1996) An ecological view of psychological trauma and trauma recovery. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9, 3–22.
28.
HathawayS. R.McKinleyJ. C. (1940) A multiphasic personality schedule (Minnesota): I. Construction of the schedule. Journal of Psychology, 10, 249–254.
29.
HendricksS. A.JenkinsE. L.AndersonK. R. (2007) Trends in workplace homicides in the U.S., 1993–2002: a decade of decline. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 50, 316–325.
30.
HoffmanP. B. (1983) Screening for risk: a revised salient factor score (SF S 81). Journal of Criminal Justice, 11, 539–547.
31.
HughesJ. R.ZagarR. J.BuschK. G.GroveW. M.ArbitJ. (2009) Looking forward in records of youth abused as children: risks for homicidal, violent, and delinquent offenses. Psychological Reports, 104, 77–101.
32.
JenningsW. I. (1938) Constitution of the British Commonwealth. The Political Quarterly, 45, 465–479.
33.
KelleherM. D. (1996) New arenas for violence: homicide in the American workplace.Westport, CT: Praeger.
34.
LallyS. L. (2003) What tests are acceptable for use in forensic evaluations?Professional Psychology, 34, 491–498.
35.
LipseyM. W.DerzonJ. H. (1998) Predictors of violent or serious delinquency in adolescence and early adulthood. In LoeberR.FarringtonD. P. (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: risk factors and successful interventions.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
LyonsJ. S.HowardK. L.O'MahoneyM. T.LishJ. D. (1998) The measurement and management of clinical outcomes in mental health.New York: Wiley.
37.
MaderoJ. N. (2004) Pre-employment screening and workplace violence prevention.Dallas, TX: International Risk Management Institute.
38.
MannheimH.WilkinsL. (1955) Prediction methods in relation to Borstal training.London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
39.
MazzaJ. I. (1997) School-based suicide prevention programs. School Psychology Review, 26, 382–396.
40.
MeehlP. (1954) Clinical versus statistical prediction.Minneapolis, MN: Univer. of Minnesota Press.
41.
MeltonG. B. (1997) Psychological evaluations for courts.New York: Guilford.
42.
MendelR. A. (2000) Less hype, more help: reducing juvenile crime, what works, and what doesn't.Washington, DC: American Youth Policy Forum.
43.
MilkovichG. T.NewmanJ. M. (2005) Compensation.New York: McGraw-Hill.
44.
MonachesiE. D. (1932) Prediction factors in probation.Hanover, NH: The Sociological Press.
45.
MossmanD. (1994) Assessing predictions of violence: Being accurate about accuracy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 783–792.
46.
NixonW. B. (2004) Workplace violence IQ test.Los Angeles, CA: The National Institute for the Prevention of Workplace Violence.
47.
NuffieldJ. (1982) Parole decision making in Canada: research towards decision guidelines.Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Communication Division, Solicitor General Canada, Minister of Supply and Services, Canada.
48.
OhlinL. E. (1951) Selection for parole: a manual of parole prediction.New York: Sage Foundation.
49.
PaglioccaP.NickersonA. B. (2001) Legislating school crisis response. Law and Policy, 23, 374–407.
50.
PannielloJ. (2004) Workplace violence.Boston, MA: Center for Criminal Justice Policy Research.
51.
PerryB. D. (1997) Incubated in terror: neurodevelopment factors in the “cycle of violence.” In OsofskyJ. (Ed.), Children, youth and violence: the search for solutions.New York: Guilford. Pp. 124–148.
52.
PopeK.ButcherJ.SeelenJ. (2006) The MMPI, MMPI–2, MMPI–A in court: a practical guide for expert witnesses and attorneys. (3rd ed.) Washington, DC: American Psychological Assn.
53.
QuinnT. (1999) A kind and just parent: juvenile court.Chicago, IL: Beacon.
54.
QulnseyV. L.HarrisG. T.RiceM. E.CormierC. A. (1998) Violent offenders: appraising and managing risk.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
55.
QuirkJ. H. (1993) Human resource managers face legal aspects of workplace violence. Human Resource Magazine, 25, 19–23.
56.
RosalesA. V.RosseggerA. (2008) Validation and calibration of VRAG in Switzerland. European Psychiatry, 23, S345.
57.
SimonE. (1956) Prediction methods in criminology.London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
58.
SleekS. (1998) Expert scrambling on school shootings. American Psychological Association Monitor, 29, 1–37.
59.
State Library of North Carolina. (2003) Workplace violence prevention, Raleigh, NC: Author
60.
SteinbergL. (2007) Risk taking in adolescence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 55–59,
United Nations. (1954) United Nations Charter.New York: United Nations Press.
63.
U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS. (2006) U.S. Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries.Washington, DC: Author.
64.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS. (2006) Violence and discipline problems in U.S. public schools.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
65.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF JUSTICE STATISTICS. (2006a) School crime supplement to the National Crime Victimization Survey, indicators of school crime and safety.Washington, DC: Author.
66.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF JUSTICE STATISTICS. (2006b) National Crime Victimization Survey.Washington, DC: Author.
67.
VoldG. B. (1935) Prediction methods applied to problems of classification within institutions. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 26, 202–209.
68.
WalkerN.McCabeS. (1973) Crime and insanity in England. (Vol. 2) Edinburgh, Scotland: Univer. of Edinburgh.
69.
WarrenJ. I.SmithS. C.BurnetteM. L.RogersA.FridR.BaleC.Van PattenI. (2003) Understanding risk factors for violence and criminally ill events. International Journal of Paw and Psychiatry, 28, 269–289.
70.
WatkinsC. E.CampbellV. L.NieberdingR.HallmarkR. (1995) Contemporary practice in psychological assessment by clinical psychologists. Professional Psychology, 26, 54–60.
71.
Youth Violence Project, Univer of Virginia. (2006) Violence in the schools.Richmond, VA: Univer. of Virginia Press.
72.
ZagarA. K.ZagarR. J.BartikowskiB.BuschK. G. (2009) Cost comparisons of raising a child from birth to 17 years among samples of abused, delinquent, violent, and homicidal youth using victimization and justice system estimates. Psychological Reports, 104, 309–338.
73.
ZagarR. J.BuschK. G.GroveW. M.HughesJ. R. (2009a) Can violent (re)offense be predicted? A review of the role of the clinician and use of actuarial tests in light of new data. Psychological Reports, 104, 247–277.
74.
ZagarR. J.BuschK. G.GroveW. M.HughesJ. R. (2009b) Summary of studies of abused infants and children later homicidal, and homicidal, assaulting later homicidal, and sexual homicidal youth and adults. Psychological Reports, 104, 17–45.
75.
ZagarR. J.BuschK. G.GroveW. M.HughesJ. R.ArbitJ. (2009a) Looking forward in records of youth abused as infants: risks for homicidal, violent, and delinquent offenses. Psychological Reports, 104, 47–75.
76.
ZagarR. J.BuschK. G.GroveW. M.HughesJ. R.ArbitJ. (2009b) Looking forward and backward in records for risks among homicidal youth. Psychological Reports, 104, 103–127.
77.
ZagarR. J.BuschK. G.GroveW. M.HughesJ. R.ArbitJ. (2009c) Looking forward in records of young adults who were convicted of homicide or assault as youth: risks for reoffending. Psychological Reports, 104, 129–154.
78.
ZagarR. J.BuschK. G.HughesJ. R.ArbitJ. (2009) Comparing early and late twentieth-century Boston and Chicago male juvenile offenders: what changed?Psychological Reports, 104, 185–198.
79.
ZagarR.J.IsbellS. A.BuschK.G.HughesJ.R. (2009) An empirical theory of the development of homicide within individuals. Psychological Reports, 104, 279–308.
