It has been shown that analogical problem solving is more difficult when a target problem is written in a foreign language than in one's native language. Possible resource-independence of this negative effect of a foreign language was investigated. After reading an analog or a filler story, participants solved a target problem written in their native or a foreign language. Those who read the problem in their native language performed a concurrent task to reduce their available processing resources. Nevertheless, they were better able to solve it than those who read the problem in a foreign language after reading the analog. This indicates that reading the problem in a foreign language decreases analogical problem-solving ability in a resource-independent manner.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BassokM. (2003) Analogical transfer in problem solving. In DavidsonJ. E.SternbergR. J. (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univer. Press. Pp. 343–372.
2.
CatramboneR. (2002) The effects of surface and structural feature matches on the access of story analogs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 318–334. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.28.2.318
3.
CatramboneR.HolyoakK. J. (1989) Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1147–1156. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.15.6.1147
4.
ChoS.HolyoakK. J.CannonT. D. (2007) Analogical reasoning in working memory: resources shared among relational integration, interference resolution, and maintenance. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1445–1455. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193614
5.
da Costa PintoA. (1991) Reading rates and digit span in bilinguals: the superiority of mother tongue. International Journal of Psychology, 26, 471–483. DOI: 10.1080/00207599108247135
6.
DijkstraT.GraingerJ.van HeuvenW. J. B. (1999) Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: the neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 496–518. DOI: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2654
7.
DunbarK. (1995) How scientists really reason: scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), The nature of insight. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Pp. 365–395.
8.
EmersonM. J.MiyakeA. (2003) The role of inner speech in task switching: a dual-task investigation. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 148–168. DOI: 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00511-9
9.
FrancisW. S. (1999) Analogical transfer of problem solutions within and between languages in Spanish-English bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 301–329. DOI: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2610
10.
GentnerD. (1983) Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170. DOI: 10.1016/S0364-0213(83)80009-3
11.
GentnerD. (2003) Analogical reasoning, psychology of. In NadelL. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cognitive science. Vol. 1. London, UK: Nature Publishing Group. Pp. 106–112.
12.
GentnerD.ColhounJ. (2010) Analogical processes in human thinking and learning. In GlatzederB. M.GoelV., & von MüllerA. (Eds.), Towards a theory of thinking: building blocks for a conceptual framework. Berlin and Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. Pp. 35–48. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-03129-8_3
13.
GentnerD.RattermannM. J.ForbusK. D. (1993) The roles of similarity in transfer: separating retrievability from inferential soundness. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 524–575. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1993.1013
14.
GickM. L.HolyoakK. J. (1980) Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306–355. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90013-4
15.
GickM. L.HolyoakK. J. (1983) Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1–38. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(83)90002-6
16.
HolyoakK. J.KohK. (1987) Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer. Memory & Cognition, 15, 332–340. DOI: 10.3758/BF03197035
17.
HolyoakK. J.ThagardP. R. (1989) A computational model of analogical problem solving. In VosniadouS.OrtonyA. (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning. New York: Cambridge Univer. Press. Pp. 242–266. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511529863.012
18.
HolyoakK. J.ThagardP. (1995) Mental leaps: analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
HuntE.LansmanM. (1986) Unified model of attention and problem solving. Psychological Review, 93, 446–461. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.93.4.446
20.
JaegerT. F. (2008) Categorical data analysis: away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
21.
LandrumR. E. (2005) Production of negative transfer in a problem-solving task. Psychological Reports, 97, 861–866. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.97.3.861-866
22.
MegalakakiO.TijusC.BaicheR.PoitrenaudS. (2012) The effect of semantics on problem solving is to reduce relational complexity. Thinking and Reasoning, 18, 159–182. DOI: 10.1080/13546783.2012.663101
23.
MiyakeA.EmersonM. J.PadillaF.AhnJ. (2004) Inner speech as a retrieval aid for task goals: the effects of cue type and articulatory suppression in the random task cuing paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 115, 123–142. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.12.004
24.
NeelyJ. H.KahanT. A. (2001) Is semantic activation automatic? A critical re-evaluation. In RoedigerH. L.NairneJ. S.NeathI., & SurprenantA. M. (Eds.), The nature of remembering: essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Pp. 69–93. DOI: 10.1037/10394-005
25.
ReevesL.WeisbergR. W. (1994) The role of content and abstract information in analogical transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 381–400. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.115.3.381
26.
ServiceE.SimolaM.MetsaenheimoO.MauryS. (2002) Bilingual working memory span is affected by language skill. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14, 383–407. DOI: 10.1080/09541440143000140
27.
TakanoY.NodaA. (1993) A temporary decline of thinking ability during foreign language processing. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 24, 445–462. DOI: 10.1177/0022022193244005
28.
TakanoY.NodaA. (1995) Interlanguage dissimilarity enhances the decline of thinking ability during foreign language processing. Language Learning, 45, 657–681. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00457.x
29.
ThagardP.HolyoakK.NelsonG.GochfeldD. (1990) Analog retrieval by constraint satisfaction. Artificial Intelligence, 46, 259–310. DOI: 10.1016/0004-3702(90)90018-U
30.
TylerM. D. (2001) Resource consumption as a function of topic knowledge in nonnative and native comprehension. Language Learning, 51, 257–280. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9922.00155
31.
VogaM.GraingerJ. (2007) Cognate status and cross-script translation priming. Memory & Cognition, 35, 938–952. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193467
