This article explores violent behavior within a relationship from the male abuser's perspective. A systemic approach was used, combining qualitative and quantitative information in two parallel studies. The first (Study 1) is a descriptive analysis of a group of men (N = 220) who participated in a program to address violence within the couple. In the second (Study 2), a subgroup of 8 participants was interviewed in-depth for describing and analyzing their perceptions of violence. The data analysis suggest that relationship violence (a) begins in the early stages of the relationship, (b) is long-term, (c) rarely includes serious physical aggression, (d) is dominated by a growing hostility and isolation, (e) is characterized by a lack of awareness and responsibility for the violent behavior, and (f) includes intentional and strategic use of violent behavior.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmorP. J.EcheburúaE.CorralP.ZubizarretaI.SarasuaB. (2002) Repercusiones psicopatológicas de la violencia doméstica en la mujer en función de las circunstancias del maltrato. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 2, 227–246. [in Spanish]
2.
AmorP. J.EcheburúaE.LoinazI. (2009) Se puede establecer una clasificación tipológica de los hombres violentos contra su pareja?International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 9, 519–539. [in Spanish]
3.
AmozurrutiaJ. A.MarcuelloCh. (2010) Excel spreadsheet as a tool for social narrative analysis. Quality & Quantity, 45, 953–967.
4.
BallesterA.VenturaM. (2010) Evaluación mediante el Inventario MCMI-III de mujeres víctimas de maltrato psicológico por parte de su anterior pareja. Revista Española de Medicina Legal, 36, 68–76. [in Spanish]
5.
BeckA. T. (1999) Prisoners of hate: the cognitive basis of anger, hostility and violence.New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
6.
BoiraS.Del CastilloM.CarbajosaPMarcuelloCh. (in press) Context of treatment and therapeutic alliance: critical factors in the intervention with court-ordered batterers. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, [in Spanish]
7.
BoiraS.JodráP. (2010) Psicopatología, características de la violencia y abandonos en programas para hombres violentos con la pareja: resultados en un dispositivo de intervención. Psicothema, 22, 593–599. [in Spanish]
8.
BoiraS.LópezY.TomásL.GasparA. (2010) Evaluación cualitativa de un programa de intervención psicológica con hombres violentos dentro de la pareja. Acciones e Investigaciones Sociales, 28, 135–156.
9.
BoiraS.Tomás-AragonésL. (2011) Características psicológicas y motivación para el cambio en hombres condenados por violencia contra la pareja. International Journal of Psychological Research, 4, 48–56. [in Spanish]
10.
BuchbinderE.EisikovitsZ. (2008) Doing treatment: batterers' experience of intervention. Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 616–630.
11.
CavanaughM. M.GellesR. J. (2005) The utility of male domestic violence offender typologies. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 155–166.
12.
ClementsK.Holtzworth-MunroeA. (2007) Aggressive cognitions of violent versus nonviolent spouses. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32, 351–369.
13.
Consejo General del Poder Judicial. (2012a) Datos de denuncias, procedimientos penales y civiles registrados, órdenes de protección solicitadas en los jugados de violencia sobre la mujer (JVM) y sentencias dictadas por los órganos jurisdiccionales en esta materia en el año 2011. Retrieved from http://www.observatorioviolencia.org/upload_images/File/DOC1334564939_Datos_anuales_2011.pdf. [in Spanish]
CorsiJ. (1995) Violencia masculina en la pareja: una aproximación al diagnóstico y a los modelos de intervención.Buenos Aires: Paidos. [in Spanish]
16.
DenzinN. K. (1984) Toward a phenomenology of domestic violence. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 483–513.
17.
Directorate General of Prisons [Dirección General de Instituciones Penitenciarias] (2005) Programa de tratamiento en prisión para agresores en el ámbito familiar.Madrid: Ministerio del Interior. [in Spanish]
18.
DixonL.BrowneK. (2003) The heterogeneity of spouse abuse: a review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 8, 107–130.
19.
DobashR. E.DobashR. P. (1979) Violence against wives: a case against the patriarchy.New York: Free Press.
DuttonD. G. (2003) MCMI results for batterers: a response to Gondolf. Journal of Family Violence, 18, 253–255.
22.
EcheburúaE.CorralP. (1998) Manual de violencia familiar.Madrid: S. XXI. [in Spanish]
23.
EcheburúaE.Fernández-MontalvoJ. (2009) Evaluación de un programa de tratamiento en prisión de hombres condenados por violencia grave contra la pareja. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 9, 5–20.
24.
EcheburúaE.SarasuaB.ZubizarretaI.AmorP. J.CorralP. (2010) Variables predictoras del rechazo, abandono y fracaso terapéutico en hombres violentos contra su pareja tratados psicológicamente en un marco comunitario. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 10, 403–420. [in Spanish]
25.
EcheburúaE.SarasuaB.ZubizarretaI.CorralP. (2009) Evaluación de la eficacia de un tratamiento cognitivo-conductual para hombres violentos contra la pareja en un marco comunitario: una experiencia de 10 años (1997-2007). International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 9, 199–217. [in Spanish]
26.
EckhardtC. I.BabcockJ.HomackS. (2004) Partner assaultive men and the stages and processes of change. Journal of Family Violence, 19, 81–93.
27.
EckhardtC. I.BarbourK. A.StuartG. L. (1997) Anger and hostility in maritally violent men: conceptual distinctions, measurement issues, and literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 17, 333–358.
28.
EckhardtC. I.DyeM. L. (2000) The cognitive characteristics of maritally violent men: theory and evidence. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24, 139–158.
29.
EckhardtC.NorlanderB.DeffenbacherJ. (2004) The assessment of anger and hostility: a critical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 17–43.
30.
EckhardtC.SamperR.MurphyC. (2008) Anger disturbance among perpetrators of intimate partner violence: clinical characteristics and outcomes of court-mandated treatment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 1600–1617.
31.
EscuderoA.PoloC.LópezM.AguilarL. (2005) La persuasión coercitiva, modelo explicativo del mantenimiento de las mujeres en una situación de violencia de género. Revista de la Asociación Española de Neuropsiquiatría, 95, 85–117. [in Spanish]
32.
Fernández-MontalvoJ.EcheburúaE. (1997) Variables psicopatológicas y distorsiones cognitivas de los maltratadores en el hogar: un análisis descriptivo. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta, 23, 151–180. [in Spanish]
33.
Fernández-MontalvoJ.EcheburúaE. (2005) Hombres condenados por violencia grave contra la pareja: un estudio psicopatológico. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta, 31, 451–475. [in Spanish]
34.
Fernández-MontalvoJ.EcheburúaE.AmorP. J. (2005) Aggressors against women in prison and in the community: an exploratory study of a differential profile. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 158–167.
35.
Fernández-MontalvoJ.EchauriJ. A.MartínezM.AzcárateJ. M. (2011) Violencia de género e inmigración: perfil diferencial de hombres maltratadores nacionales e inmigrantes. Psicología Conductual, 19, 439–452. [in Spanish]
36.
Fernández-MontalvoJ.López-GoñiJ. J.ArteagaA. (2011) Tratamiento de agresores contra la pareja en programas de atención a drogodependientes: un reto de futuro. Adicciones, 23, 5–9. [in Spanish]
37.
FollingstadD. R. (2007) Rethinking current approaches to psychological abuse: conceptual and methodological issues. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 439–458.
38.
GilliganJ. (2001) Preventing violence.New York: Thames and Hudson.
39.
GlaserB. (1992) Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis.Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
40.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967) The discovery of Grounded Theory: strategies for qualitative research.Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
41.
GondolfE. W. (1999) MCMI-III results for batterer program participants in four cities: less “pathological” than expected. Journal of Family Violence, 14, 1–17.
42.
GondolfE. W. (2000) Result at 30-months after batterer programs intake. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44, 111–128.
43.
GondolfE. W. (2003) MCMI results for batterers: Gondolf replies to Dutton's response. Journal of Family Violence, 18, 387–389.
44.
HambergerL. K.HastingsJ. E. (1986) Personality correlates of men who abuse their partners: a cross-validation study. Journal of Family Violence, 1, 323–341.
45.
Holtzworth-MunroeA. (2000) Cognitive factors in male intimate violence. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24, 135–138.
46.
Holtzworth-MunroeA.BatesL.SmutzlerN.SandinE. (1997) A brief review of the research on husband violence. Part I: maritally violent versus nonviolent men. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2, 65–99.
47.
Holtzworth-MunroeA.MeehanJ. C.HerronK.RehmanU.StuartG. L. (2000) Testing the Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994) batterer typology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 1000–1019.
48.
Holtzworth-MunroeA.SmutzlerN.BatesL. (1997) A brief review of the research on husband violence. Part III: sociodemographic factors, relationship factors, and differing consequences of husband and wife violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2, 285–307.
49.
JohnsonM. P. (2006) Conflict and control: gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 12, 1003–1018.
50.
JohnsonM. P. (2008) A typology of domestic violence: intimate terrorism, violent resistance, and situational couple violence.Boston: Northeastern Univer. Press.
51.
JohnsonR.GilchristE.BeechA. R.WestonS.TakritiR.FreemanR. (2006) A psychometric typology of U.K. domestic violence offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 1270–1285.
52.
KellyJ. B.JohnsonM. P. (2008) Differentiation among types of intimate partner violence: research update and implications for interventions. Family Court Review, 46, 476–499.
53.
Langhinrichsen-RohlingJ. (2010) Controversies involving gender and intimate partner violence in the United States. Sex Roles, 62, 179–193.
54.
Langhinrichsen-RohlingJ.HussM. T.RamseyS. (2000) The clinical utility of batterer typologies. Journal of Family Violence, 15, 37–53.
55.
LilaM.HerreroJ.GraciaE. (2008) Atribución de responsabilidad y minimización en hombres penados por violencia doméstica contra la mujer: un instrumento de evaluación. In RodríguezF. J.BringasC.FariñaF.ArceR.BernardoA. (Eds.), Psicología Jurídica: Familia y Victimología.Oviedo: Ediciones de la Universidad de Oviedo. Pp. 271–279 [in Spanish]
56.
LoinazI.EcheburúaE.TorrubiaR. (2010) Tipología de agresores contra la pareja en prisión. Psicothema, 22, 106–111. [in Spanish]
57.
LoinazI.EcheburúaE.UllateM. (2012) Estilo de Apego, Empatía y Autoestima en Agresores de Pareja. Terapia psicológica, 30, 61–70. [in Spanish]
58.
LoinazI.TorrubiaR.EcheburúaE.NavarroJ. C.FernándezL. (2009) Implicaciones de las tipologías de agresores de pareja para el tratamiento en prisión. Cuadernos de Medicina Psicosomática y Psiquiatría de Enlace, 91, 19–25. [in Spanish]
59.
MansleyE. (2009) Intimate partner violence: race, social class, and masculinity.El Paso, TX: LFB Scholarly.
60.
MarcuelloCh. (2006) Sociocibernética. Lineamientos de un paradigma.Zaragoza: Instituto Fernando el Católico- CSIC. [in Spanish]
61.
MarunaS. (2001) Making good: how ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives.Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
62.
MaysN.PopeC. (1995) Rigour and qualitative research. British Medical Journal, 311, 109–120.
63.
NorlanderB.EckhardtC. I. (2005) Anger, hostility, and male perpetrators of intimate partner violence: a meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 119–152.
64.
Rodríguez-CaballeiraA.AlmendrosC.EscartínJ.PorrúaC.Martín-PeñaJ.JavaloyF.CarbolesJ. A. (2005) Un estudio comparativo de las estrategias de abuso psicológico: en pareja, en el lugar de trabajo y en grupos manipulativos. Anuario de Psicología, 3, 299–314. [in Spanish]
65.
RosenbergM. (2003) Voices from the group: domestic violence offenders' experience of intervention. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, & Trauma, 7, 305–317.
66.
RossJ. M.BabcockJ. C. (2010) Gender and intimate partner violence in the United States: confronting the controversies. Sex Roles, 62, 194–200.
67.
SanzA. (2005) El método biográfico en investigación social: potencialidades y limitaciones de las fuentes orales y los documentos personales. Asclepio, 57, 99–115. [in Spanish]
68.
SaundersD. G. (2008) Group interventions for men who batter: a summary of program descriptions and research. Violence and Victims, 23, 156–172.
69.
SchumacherJ. A.SlepA. M. S.HeymanR. E. (2001) Risk factors for male-to-female partner psychological abuse. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6, 255–268.
70.
ScottK. L.WolfeD. (2000) Change among batterers: examining men's success stories. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 827–842.
ShamaiM.BuchbinderE. (2010) Control of the self: partner-violent men's experience of therapy. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 1338–1362.
73.
SiavilC.RibotS. (2007) Implicaciones conceptuales y metodológicas en la aplicación de la entrevista en profundidad. Laurus: Revista de Educación, 23, 249–262. [in Spanish]
74.
SilvergliedC. S.MankowskiE. S. (2006) How batterer intervention programs work: participant and facilitator accounts of processes of change. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 139–159.
75.
StarkE. (2010) Do violent acts equal abuse? Resolving the gender parity/asymmetry dilemma. Sex Roles, 62, 201–211.
76.
StuartG. L.TempleJ. R.FollansbeeK. W.BucossiM. M.HellmuthJ. C.MooreT. M. (2008) The role of drug use in a conceptual model of intimate partner violence in men and women arrested for domestic violence. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 22, 12–24.
77.
TaftC. T.MurphyC. M. (2007) The working alliance in intervention for partner violence perpetrators: recent research and theory. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 11–18.
78.
TaftC. T.MurphyC. M.ElliottJ. D.MorrelT. M. (2001) Attendance enhancing procedures in group counseling for domestic abusers. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 51–60.
79.
TaftC. T.MurphyC. M.KingD.MusserP. H.DeDeynJ. M. (2003) Process and treatment adherence factors in group cognitive-behavioral therapy for partner violent men. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 812–820.
80.
TaylorS.BogdanR. (1987) Introducción a los métodos cualitativos de investigación.Buenos Aires: Paidós. [in Spanish]
81.
von FoersterH. (1995) Anthology of principles, propositions, theorems, roadsigns definitions, postulates, aphorisms, etc. Cybernetics and circularity. Retrieved from http://www.cybsoc.org/heinz.htm.
82.
WarehamJ.BootsD. P.ChavezJ. M. (2009) A test of social learning and intergenerational transmission among batterers. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 163–173.
83.
ZagarR. J.BuschK. G.HughesJ. R. (2009) Empirical risk factors for delinquency and best treatments: where do we go from here?Psychological Reports, 104, 279–308.
