The Google Ngram Viewer shows the frequency of words in a large corpus of books over two centuries. In this study, the names of two pseudosciences, astrology and phrenology, were compared. An interesting pattern emerged. While the level of interest in astrology remained relatively stable over the course of two centuries, interest in phrenology rose rapidly in the early 1800s but then declined. Reasons for this pattern are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FrazerJ. G. (1922) The golden bough: A study in magic and religion. New York: Macmillan.
2.
GordinM. D. (2012) The pseudoscience wars: Immanuel Velikovsky and the birth of the modern fringe. Chicago, IL: Univer. of Chicago Press.
3.
KellyI. W. (1979) Astrology and science: A critical examination. Psychological Reports, 44(3c), 1231–1240.
LeaheyT. H.LeaheyG. E. (1983) Psychology's occult doubles: Psychology and the problem of pseudoscience. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
6.
LilienfeldS. O.MarshallJ.ToddJ. T.ShaneH. C. (2014) The persistence of fad interventions in the face of negative scientific evidence: Facilitated communication for autism as a case example. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 8(2), 62–101.
7.
MichelJ. B.ShenY. K.AidenA. P.VeresA.GrayM. K., The Google Books Team, PickettJ. P.HoibergD.ClancyD.NorvigP.OrwantJ.PinkerS.NowakM. A.AidenE. L. (2011) Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science, 331(6014), 176–182.
8.
PopperK. R. (1959) The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Basic Books.
9.
SimpsonD. (2005) Phrenology and the neurosciences: Contributions of F. J. Gall and J. G. Spurzheim. ANZ Journal of Surgery, 75(6), 475–482.
