Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The literature in achievement goals includes mixed results as to the factor structure of achievement goal measures, particularly the Achievement Goal Questionnaire–Revised (AGQ–R). In a sample of 1,496 undergraduate students (600 men, 891 women, 5 unreported sex; M age = 20.6 yr., SD = 3.2), the AGQ–R was subjected to an exploratory factor analysis that suggested three factors. Then, in a different sample of 1,125 undergraduate students (270 men, 750 women, 5 unreported sex; M age = 21.7 yr., SD = 5.4), the measure was subjected to a confirmatory factor analysis, in which a three-factor solution, again, showed the best fit to the observed data. The implications of these results for the measurement of achievement goals are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ames

(1992) Classrooms: goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271.

Attenweiler

W. J.

Moore

(2006) Goal orientations: two, three, or more factors? Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(2), 342–352.

Campbell

H. L.

Barry

C. L.

Joe

J. N.

Finney

S. J.

(2008) Configural, metric, and scalar invariance of the Modified Achievement Goal Questionnaire across African American and White university students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(6), 988–1007.

Conroy

D. E.

Elliot

A. J.

Hofer

S. M.

(2003) A 2×2 achievement goals questionnaire for sport: evidence for factorial invariance, temporal stability, and external validity. Sport Psychology, 25, 456–476.

Donnellan

M. B.

(2008) A psychometric evaluation of two achievement goal inventories. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(4), 643–658.

Elliot

A. J.

(1999) Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169–189.

Elliot

A. J.

(2005) A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In Elliot

A. J.

Dweck

C. S.

(Eds.), Handbook of competence motivation. New York: Guilford Press. Pp. 52–72.

Elliot

A. J.

Church

M. A.

(1997) A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218–232.

Elliot

A. J.

McGregor

H. A.

(2001) A 2×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501–519.

10.

Elliot

A. J.

Murayama

(2008) On the measurement of achievement goals: critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 613–628.

11.

Elliot

A. J.

Thrash

T. M.

(2001) Achievement goals and the hierarchical model of achievement motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 139–156.

12.

Finney

S. J.

Pieper

S. L.

Barron

K. E.

(2004) Examining the psychometric properties of the Achievement Goal Questionnaire in a general academic context. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(2), 365–382.

13.

Grant

Dweck

C. S.

(2003) Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 541–553.

14.

Horn

J. L.

(1965) A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185.

15.

Remedios

Kiseleva

Elliott

(2008) Goal orientations in Russian university students: from mastery to performance? Educational Psychology, 28(6), 677–691.

16.

Zwick

W. R.

Velicer

W. F.

(1986) Factors influencing five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432–442.

A Factor Analytic Examination of the Achievement Goal Questionnaire–Revised Supports a Three-Factor Model

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References