Framing Effects on Physicians' Judgment and Decision Making

Abstract

This study aimed to assess physicians' susceptibility to framing effects in clinical judgment and decision making. A survey was administered online to 159 general internists in the United States. Participants were randomized into two groups, in which clinical scenarios varied in their framings: frequency vs percentage, with cost information vs without, female patient vs male patient, and mortality vs survival. Results showed that physicians' recommendations for patients in hypothetical scenarios were significantly different when the predicted probability of the outcomes was presented in frequency versus percentage form and when it was presented in mortality rate vs survival rate of the same magnitude. Physicians' recommendations were not different for other framing effects.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ABIM Foundation. (2012) Five things physicians and patients should question. Retrieved October 14, 2014, from www.choosingwisely.org.

Almashat

Ayotte

Edelstein

Margrett

(2008) Framing effect debiasing in medical decision making. Patient Education & Counseling, 71(1), 102–107.

Blumenthal-Barby

J. S.

Krieger

(2015) Cognitive biases and heuristics in medical decision making: A critical review using a systematic search strategy. Medical Decision Making, 35(4), 539–557.

Bornstein

B. H.

Emler

A. C.

(2001) Rationality in medical decision making: A review of the literature on doctors' decision-making biases. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 7(2), 97–107.

Bornstein

B. H.

Emler

A. C.

Chapman

G. B.

(1999) Rationality in medical treatment decisions: Is there a sunk-cost effect? Social Science & Medicine, 49(2), 215–222.

Brannon

L. A.

Carson

K. L.

(2003) The representativeness heuristic: Influence on nurses' decision making. Applied Nursing Research, 16(3), 201–204.

Broverman

I. K.

Broverman

D. M.

Clarkson

F. E.

Rosenkrantz

P. S.

Vogel

S. R.

(1970) Sex-role stereotypes and clinical judgments of mental health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 34(1), 1–7.

Bursztajn

H. J.

Chanowitz

Gutheil

T. G.

Hamm

R. M.

(1992) Micro-effects of language on risk perception in drug prescribing behavior. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 20(1), 59–66.

Camerer

Loewenstein

Rabin

(Eds.) (2004) Advances in behavioral economics. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univer. Press.

10.

Cassel

Guest

(2012) Choosing wisely: Helping physicians and patients make smart decisions about their care. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 307(17), 1801.

11.

Chapman

Elstein

A. S.

(2003) Cognitive processes and biases in medical decision making. In Chapman

G. B.

Sonnenberg

F. A.

(Eds.), Decision making in health care: Theory, psychology, and applications. New York: Cambridge Univer. Press. Pp. 183–210.

12.

Christensen

Heckerung

Mackesy-Amiti

M. E.

Bernstein

L. M.

Elstein

A. S.

(1995) Pervasiveness of framing effects among physicians and medical students. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 8(3), 169–180.

13.

Edwards

Elwyn

Covey

Matthews

Pill

(2001) Presenting risk information: A review of the effects of “framing” and other manipulations on patient outcomes. Journal of Health Communication, 6(1), 61–82.

14.

Eysenbach

(2004) Improving the quality of web surveys: The checklist for reporting results of Internet e-surveys (CHERRIES). Journal of Medical Internet Research, 6(3), e34.

15.

Gallagher

K. M.

Updegraff

J. A.

(2011) Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 43(1), 101–116.

16.

Gigerenzer

Gaissmaier

(2011) Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 451–482.

17.

Hall

K. H.

(2002) Reviewing intuitive decision-making and uncertainty: The implications for medical education. Medical Education, 36(3), 216–224.

18.

Hampers

L. C.

Cha

Gutglass

D. J.

Krug

S. E.

Binns

H. J.

(1999) The effect of price information on test-ordering behavior and patient outcomes in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatrics, 103(4, Pt. 2), 877–882.

19.

Kahneman

Slovic

Tversky

(1982) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. (1st ed.) New York: Cambridge Univer. Press.

20.

Kahneman

Tversky

(1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.

21.

Kale

M. S.

Bishop

T. F.

Federman

A. D.

Keyhani

(2011) “Top 5” lists top $5 billion. Archives of Internal Medicine, 171(20), 1856–1858.

22.

Marcatto

Rolison

Ferrante

(2013) Communicating clinical trial outcomes: Effects of presentation method on physicians' evaluations of new treatments. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(1), 29–33.

23.

Marteau

T. M.

(1989) Framing of information: Its influence upon decisions of doctors and patients. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 28(Part 1), 89–94.

24.

McGraw

A. P.

Shafir

Todorov

(2010) Valuing money and things: Why a $20 item can be worth more and less than $20. Management Science, 56(5), 816–830.

25.

McNeil

B. J.

Pauker

S. G.

Sox

H. C.

Jr. Tversky

(1982) On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. The New England Journal of Medicine, 306(21), 1259–1262.

26.

O'Keefe

D. J.

Jensen

J. D.

(2009) The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease detection behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 296–316.

27.

Perneger

T. V.

Agoritsas

(2011) Doctors and patients' susceptibility to framing bias: A randomized trial. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 26(12), 1411–1417.

28.

Peters

Hart

P. S.

Fraenkel

(2011) Informing patients: The influence of numeracy, framing, and format of side effect information on risk perceptions. Medical Decision Making, 31(3), 432–436.

29.

Rottenstreich

Hsee

C. K.

(2001) Money, kisses, and electric shocks: On the affective psychology of risk. Psychological Science, 12(3), 185–190.

30.

Slovic

Monahan

MacGregor

D. G.

(2000) Violence risk assessment and risk communication: The effects of using actual cases, providing instruction, and employing probability versus frequency formats. Law and Human Behavior, 24(3), 271–296.

31.

Swindell

J. S.

McGuire

A. L.

Halpern

S. D.

(2010) Beneficent persuasion: Techniques and ethical guidelines to improve patients' decisions. Annals of Family Medicine, 8(3), 260–264.

32.

Tierney

W. M.

Miller

M. E.

McDonald

C. J.

(1990) The effect on test ordering of informing physicians of the charges for outpatient diagnostic tests. The New England Journal of Medicine, 322(21), 1499–1504. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199005243222105

33.

Tversky

Kahneman

(1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.

34.

Tversky

Kahneman

(1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.

35.

Ubel

P. A.

Jepson

Baron

Hershey

J. C.

Asch

D. A.

(2003) The influence of cost-effectiveness information on physicians' cancer screening recommendations. Social Science & Medicine, 56(8), 1727–1736.

36.

Wegwarth

Schwartz

L. M.

Woloshin

Gaissmaier

Gigerenzer

(2012) Do physicians understand cancer screening statistics? A national survey of primary care physicians in the United States. Annals of Internal Medicine, 156(5), 340–349.