The relationship between learning environment characteristics and academic engagement of 777 Grade 6 children located in 41 learning environments was explored. Questionnaires were used to tap learning environment perceptions of children, their academic engagement, and their ethnic-cultural background. The basis of the learning environment questionnaire was the International System for Teacher Observation and Feedback (ISTOF). Factor analysis indicated three factors: the teacher as a helpful and good instructor (having good instructional skills, clear instruction), the teacher as promoter of active learning and differentiation, and the teacher as manager and organizer of classroom activities. Multilevel analysis indicated that about 12% of the differences in engagement between children was related to the learning environment. All the mentioned learning environment characteristics mattered, but the teacher as a helpful, good instructor was most important followed by the teacher as promoter of active learning and differentiation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AldridgeJ. M.FraserB. J., & HuangT. I. (1999) Investigating classroom environments in Taiwan and Australia with multiple research methods. Journal of Educational Research, 93, 48–62.
2.
AlfassiM. (2004) Effects of a learner-centred environment on the academic competence and motivation of students at risk. Learning Environments Research, 7, 1–22.
3.
Alton-LeeA. (2003) Quality teaching for diverse students in schooling: best evidence synthesis. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education, Medium Term Strategy Policy Division.
4.
AndersonA.HamiltonR. J., & HattieJ. (2004) Classroom climate and motivated behaviour in secondary schools. Learning Environments Research, 7, 211–225.
5.
AndersonL. M. (1989) Classroom instruction. In ReynoldsM. C. (Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teacher. Oxford, UK: Pergamon. Pp. 101–115.
6.
ArteltC.BaumertJ.Julius-McElvanyN., & PescharJ. (2003) Learners for life-student approaches to learning: results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD.
7.
BaumertJ.BlumW., & NeubrandM. (2001) Surveying the instructional conditions and domain-specific individual prerequisites for the development of mathematical competencies. Paper presented at the special meeting on the co-ordination of national teacher components for PISA 2003, 28 May, Munich, Germany.
8.
BaumrindD. (1991) The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance abuse. The Journal of Adolescence, 11, 56–95.
9.
BerlinerD. C. (1988) Effective classroom management and instruction: a knowledge base for consultation. In GradenJ. L.ZinsJ. E., & CurtisM. J. (Eds.), Alternative education delivery systems: enhancing instructional options for all students. Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists. Pp. 309–325.
10.
BoekaertsM., & CornoL. (2005) Self-regulation in the classroom: a perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology, 54, 199–231.
11.
BoekaertsM., & SimonsP. R. J. (1993) Leren en instructie: psychologie van de leerling en het leerproces [Learning and instruction: psychology of the student and the learning process].Assen, The Netherlands: Dekker & Van de Vegt.
12.
BrophyJ. (1986) Teacher influence on student achievement. American Psychologist, 41, 1069–1077.
13.
BrophyJ. (2006) History of research on classroom management. In EvertsonC. M. & WeinsteinC. S. (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: research practice and contemporary issues. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 17–43.
14.
BrophyJ., & GoodT. (1970) Teachers' communication of differential expectations for children's classroom performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 365–374.
15.
BrophyJ., & GoodT. L. (1986) Teacher behavior and student achievement. In WittrockM. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. (3rd ed.) New York: MacMillan. Pp. 328–375.
16.
ChurchM. A.ElliotA. J., & GableS. L. (2001) Perceptions of classroom environments, achievement goals, and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 43–54.
17.
CohenD. K. (1988a) Teaching practice: plus que ça change … In JacksonP. (Ed.), Contributing to educational change: perspectives on research and practice. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan. Pp. 27–84.
18.
CohenJ. (1988b) Statistical power and analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19.
CollinsA.BrownJ. S., & NewmanS. E. (1989) Cognitive apprenticeship: teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In ResnickL. B. (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 453–495.
20.
ConnellJ. P., & WellbornJ. G. (1991) Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: a motivational analysis of self-system processes. In GunnarM. R. & SroufeL. A. (Eds.), Self processes in development: Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology. Vol. 23. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 43–77.
21.
CreemersB. P. M. (1994) The effective classroom. London: Cassell.
22.
CreemersB. P. M. (2005) Combining different ways of learning and teaching in a dynamic model of educational effectiveness. Lecture for the Lee Hysan Lecture Series, Hong Kong, September. Groningen, The Netherlands: University of Groningen, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences. Retrieved on June 23, 2011, from http://www.rug.n…1/staff/b.p.m.creemers/papers.
23.
CreemersB. P. M., & KyriakidesL. (2006) Critical analysis of the current approaches to modelling educational effectiveness: the importance of establishing a dynamic model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17, 347–366.
24.
D'AgostinoJ. (2000) Instructional and school effects on students' longitudinal reading and mathematics achievements. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11, 197–235.
25.
Darling-HammondL. (1996) The right to learn and the advancement of teaching: research, policy, and practice for democratic education. Educational Researcher, 25(6), 5–17.
26.
DeciE., & RyanR. (Eds.) (2002) Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: Univer. of Rochester Press.
27.
den BrokP.BergenT.StahlR. J., & BrekelmansM. (2004) Students' perceptions of control behaviours. Learning and Instruction, 11, 425–443.
28.
den BrokP.van TartwijkJ.WubbelsT., & VeldmanI. (2010) The differential effect of teacher-student interpersonal relationship on student outcomes for students with different ethnic backgrounds. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 199–221.
29.
DoyleW. (1985) Effective secondary classroom practices. In KyleR. M. J. (Ed.), Reaching for excellence: an effective schools sourcebook. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Pp. 55–70.
EvertsonC. M., & RandolphC. H. (1999) Perspectives on classroom management in learning-centered classrooms. In WaxmanH. & WalbergH. (Eds.), New directions for teaching practice and research. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan. Pp. 249–268.
32.
EvertsonC. M., & WeinsteinC. S. (2006) Classroom management as a field of inquiry. In EvertsonC. M. & WeinsteinC. S. (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: research practice and contemporary issues. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 3–15.
33.
FraserB. J. (1998a) The birth of a new journal: editor's introduction. Learning Environments Research, 1, 1–5.
34.
FraserB. J. (1998b) Science learning environments: assessment, effects, and determinants. In FraserB. J. & TobinK. G. (Eds.), International handbook of science education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. Pp. 527–564.
35.
FraserB. J. (1998c) Classroom environment instruments: development, validity, and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1, 7–33.
36.
FraserB. J. (2007) Classroom learning environments. In AbellS. K. & LedermanN. G. (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 103–124.
37.
FraserB. J.McRobbieC. J., & FisherD. L. (1996) Development, validation, and use of personal and class forms of a new classroom environment instrument. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, April.
38.
FraserB. J.WalbergH. J.WelchW. W., & HattieJ. A. (1987) Syntheses of educational productivity research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 145–252.
39.
FurrerC., & SkinnerE. (2003) Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 148–162.
40.
GettingerM., & KohlerK. M. (2006) Process-outcome approaches to classroom management and effective teaching. In EvertsonC. M. & WeinsteinC. S. (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: research practice and contemporary issues. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 73–95.
GregoireM., & AlginaJ. (2000) Reconceptualizing the debate on school climate and students' academic motivation and achievement: a multilevel analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, April.
43.
HamreB. K., & PiantaR. C. (2001) Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children's school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72, 625–638.
44.
HamreB. K., & PiantaR. C. (2005) Can instructional and emotional support in the first-grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure?Child Development, 76, 949–967.
45.
JangH.ReeveJ., & DeciE. L. (2010) Engaging students in learning activities: it's not autonomy support or structure, but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 588–600.
46.
JangH.ReeveJ.RyanR. M., & KimA. (2009) Can self-determination theory explain what underlies the productive, satisfying learning experiences of collectivistically oriented Korean students?Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 644–661.
47.
KowalskiP. (2007) Changes in students' motivation to learn during the first year of college. Psychological Reports, 101, 79–89.
48.
KrappA., & LewalterD. (2001) Development of interests and interest-based motivational orientations: a longitudinal study in vocational school, work settings. In VoletS. & JärvelaS. (Eds.), Motivation in learning contexts: theoretical and methodological implications. London: Elsevier. Pp. 209–232.
49.
KyriakidesL. (2007) Generic and differentiated models of educational effectiveness: implications for the improvement of educational practice. In TownsendT. (Ed.), International handbook of school effectiveness and improvement. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. Pp. 41–56.
50.
KyriakidesL.CreemersB. P. M., & AntoniouP. (2009) Teacher behaviour and student outcomes: suggestions for research on teacher training and professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 12–23.
51.
La GuardiaJ. G., & RyanR. M. (2002) What adolescents need: a self-determination theory perspective on development within families, school, and society. In PajaresF. & UrdanT. (Eds.), Academic motivation of adolescents. Vol. 2. Greenwich, CT: Information Age. Pp. 193–219.
52.
LaddG. W. (1989) Children's social competence and social supports: precursors of early school adjustment? In SchneiderB. H.AttiliG.NadelJ., & WeissbergR. P. (Eds.), Social competence in developmental perspective. (NATO Advanced Science Institutes series, Series D: Behavioural and social sciences, Vol. 51) New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum. Pp. 277–291.
53.
LeeO. (1995) Subject matter knowledge, classroom management, and instructional practices in middle school science classrooms. Research in Science Teaching, 32, 423–440.
54.
LevyJ.den BrokP. J.WubbelsT., & BrekelmAns M. (2003) Students' perceptions of interpersonal aspects of the learning environment. Learning Environment Research, 6, 5–36.
55.
MaulanaR.OpdenakkerM-C.den BrokP., & BoskerR. (2011) Teacher-student interpersonal relationships in Indonesia: profiles and importance to student motivation. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 31, 33–49.
56.
McCombsB. L., & WhislerB. J. (1997) The learner-centered classroom and school: strategies for increasing student motivation and achievement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
57.
MinnaertA.BoekaertsM., & de BrabanderC. (2007) Autonomy competence, and social relatedness in task interest within project-based education. Psychological Reports, 101, 574–586.
58.
MinnaertA.BoekaertsM.de BrabanderC., & OpdenakkerM-C. (2011) Student experiences of autonomy, competence, social relatedness, and interest within a CSCL environment in vocational education: the case of commerce and business administration. Vocations and Learning: Studies in Vocational and Professional Education. DOI: 10.1007/s12186-011-9056-7.
59.
MinnaertA.BoekaertsM., & OpdenakkerM-C. (2008) The relationship between students' interest development and their conceptions and perceptions of group work. Unterrichtswissenschaft. Zeitschrift für Lernforschung, 36, 216–236.
60.
MorrisonF. J., & ConnorC. M. (2002) Understanding schooling effects on early literacy: a working research strategy. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 493–500.
61.
MuijsD.CampbellJ.KyriakidesL., & RobinsonW. (2005) Making the case for differentiated teacher effectiveness: an overview of research in four key areas. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16, 51–70.
62.
NicholsJ. D. (2006) Empowerment and relationships: a classroom model to enhance student motivation. Learning Environments Research, 9, 149–161.
63.
NiemiecC. P., & RyanR. M. (2009) Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7, 133–144.
64.
NietoS. (1996) Lessons from students on creating a chance to dream. In ElmoreR. F. (Ed.), Working together toward reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univer. Press. Pp. 77–111.
65.
NyeB.KonstantopoulosS., & HedgesL. V. (2004) How large are teacher effects?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 237–257.
66.
OpdenakkerM-C. (2009) ISTOF Leerlingvragenlijst ‘Mijn Klas'. Versie Basisonderwijs–Nederland. [ISTOF Student questionnaire “My class.” Primary education–The Netherlands]Groningen, The Netherlands: Univer. of Groningen, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences.
67.
OpdenakkerM-C., & MaulanaR. (2010) Teacher-student relationships and academic engagement: how do they develop and link? In WubbelsT.den BrokP.van TartwijkJ.LevyJ., & FraserB. (Eds.), International Conference on Interpersonal Relationships in Education (ICIRE) 25–29 April, Boulder, Colorado, USA. Eindhoven, The Netherlands: TUe-UU-LU. Pp. 19.
68.
OpdenakkerM-C., & Van DammeJ. (2000) Effects of schools, teaching staff, and classes on achievement and well-being in secondary education: similarities and differences between school outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11, 165–196.
69.
OpdenakkerM-C., & Van DammeJ. (2006) Teacher characteristics and teaching styles as effectiveness enhancing factors of classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 1–21.
70.
OpdenakkerM-C., & Van DammeJ. (2009) L'efficacité des classes dans l'enseignement secondaire. In DupriezV. & DumayX. (Eds.), L'efficacité dans l'enseignement: promesses et zones d'ombre. Brussels, Belgium: De Boeck. Pp. 55–72.
71.
OstermanK. F. (2001) Students' need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70, 323–367.
72.
PintrichP. R., & De GrootE. V. (1990) Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.
73.
PrenzelM.KramerK., & DrechselB. (2002) Self-determined and interested learning in vocational education. In BeckK. (Ed.), Teaching-learning processes in vocational education. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang. Pp. 43–68.
74.
RasbashJ.CharltonC.BrowneW. J.HealyM., & CameronB. (2005) MLwiN Version 2.0. Bristol, UK: Univer. of Bristol, Centre for Multilevel Modelling.
75.
ReeveJ.JangH.CarrellD.JeonS., & BarchJ. (2004) Enhancing students' engagement by increasing teachers' autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 147–169.
76.
ResnickL. B. (1987) Education and learning to think. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
77.
RoedeE. (1989) Explaining student investment: an investigation of high school students' retrospective causal accounts of their investment in school. Academic dissertation, Stichting Centrum voor Onderwijsonderzoek, Universiteit van Amsterdam.
78.
RyanA. M., & PatrickH. (2001) The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents' motivation and engagement during middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 437–460.
79.
RyanR. M., & DeciE. L. (2000) The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
80.
ScheerensJ. (2007) Review and meta-analyses of school and teaching effectiveness. Twente, The Netherlands: Univer. of Twente, Department of Educational Organization and Management.
81.
SeidelT.PrenzelM.DuitR.EulerM.GeiserH.HoffmannL.LehrkeM.MüllerC., & RimmeleR. (2002) “Can everybody look to the front of the classroom please?” Patterns of instruction in elementary physics classrooms and its implications for students' learning. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 30, 52–77.
82.
SinclairB. B., & FraserB. J. (2002) Changing classroom environments in urban middle schools. Learning Environments Research, 5, 301–328.
83.
SkinnerE. A., & BelmontM. J. (1993) Motivation in the classroom: reciprocal effects of teacher behaviour and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571–581.
84.
SkinnerE. A.KindermannT. A., & FurrerC. J. (2009) A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: conceptualization and assessment of children's behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 493–525.
85.
SnowR. E., & LohmanD. E. (1984) Toward a theory of cognitive aptitude for learning from instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 347–376.
86.
StallingsJ. (1985) Effective elementary classroom practices. In KyleR. M. J. (Ed.), Reaching for excellence: an effective schools sourcebook. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Pp. 19–38.
87.
StevensL.Van WerkhovenW.StokkingK.CastelijnsJ., & JagerA. (2001) Interactive instruction to prevent attention problems in class. Learning Environments Research, 3, 265–286.
88.
TeddlieC.CreemersB.KyriakidesL.MuijsD., & YuF. (2006) The International System for Teacher Observation and Feedback: evolution of an international study of teacher effectiveness constructs. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 561–582.
89.
WalbergH. J. (1986) Synthesis of research on teaching. In WittrockM. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching: a project of the American Educational Research Association. Vol. 3. New York: MacMillan.
90.
WangM. C.HaertelG. D., & WalbergH. T. (1993) Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research, 63, 249–294.
91.
WentzelK. (2002) Are effective teachers like good parents? Teaching styles and student adjustment in early adolescence. Child Development, 73, 287–301.
92.
WubbelsT., & BrekelmansM. (2005) Two decades of research on teacher-student relationships in class. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 6–24.
93.
WubbelsT.BrekelmansM.Den BrokP., & TartwijkJ. (2006) An interpersonal perspective on classroom management in secondary classrooms in The Netherlands. In EvertsonC. M. & WeinsteinC. S. (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: research, practice, and contemporary issues. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 1161–1191.
94.
YamauchiH.KumagalY., & KawasakiY. (1999) Perceived control, autonomy, and self-regulated learning strategies among Japanese high school students. Psychological Reports, 85, 779–798.
