The present study assessed the psychometric properties of the Frustration Discomfort Scale for Turkish college students. The Frustration Discomfort Scale (FDS), Procrastination Assessment Scale-Student, and Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale were administered to a sample of 171 (98 women, 73 men) Turkish college students. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis yielded fit index values demonstrating viability of the four-dimensional solution as in the original. Findings also revealed that, as predicted, the Discomfort Intolerance subscale of Turkish FDS was most strongly correlated with procrastination. Overall results provided evidence for the factor validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the scale for use in a Turkish population.
BandalosD. L. (2008) Is parceling really necessary? A comparison of results from item parceling and categorical variable methodology. Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 211–240.
3.
BanduraA. (1986) Social Foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
BentlerP. M. (1990) Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
5.
BentlerP. M.BonettD. G. (1980) Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.
6.
BuckleyM. R.CoteJ. A.ComstockS. M. (1990) Measurement errors in behavioral sciences: the case of personality/attitude research. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50, 447–474.
7.
ButterfieldE. C. (1962) Locus of control, test anxiety, reactions to frustration, and achievement attitudes. Journal of Personality, 32(3), 355–370.
8.
ByrneB. M. (1996) Academic self-concept: its structure, measurement and relation to academic achievement. In BrackenB. A. (Ed.), Handbook of self-concept.New York, NY: Wiley. Pp. 287–316.
9.
CaninoG.BravoM. (Eds.) (1999) The translation and adaptation of diagnostic instruments for cross-cultural use.New York: Guilford.
EllisA. (1995) Better, deeper, and more enduring brief therapy.New York: Brunner/Mazel.
12.
EllisA.DrydenW. (1987) The practice of rational-emotive therapy.New York: Springer.
13.
EllisA.KnausW. J. (1977) Overcoming procrastination: or how to think and act rationally in spite of life's inevitable hassles.Bloomington, IN: Univer. of Indiana Press.
14.
EskinM. (2003) A cross-cultural investigation of the communication of suicidal intent in Swedish and Turkish adolescents. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 44, 1–6.
15.
FerrariJ. R. (1989) Reliability of academic and dispositional measures of procrastination. Psychological Reports, 64, 1057–1058.
16.
FlahertyJ. A.GaviriaF. M.PathakD.MitchellT.WintropR.RichmanJ. A.BirzS. (1988) Developing instruments for cross-cultural psychiatric research. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 176(5), 257–263.
17.
FroehlichR. A. (1987) A descriptive study of general procrastination in a group oriented treatment setting. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, United States International Univer., Kenya.
18.
GreenS. B.HershbergerS. L. (2000) Correlated errors in true score models and their effect on coefficient alpha. Structural Equation Modeling, 7(2), 251–270.
19.
HarringtonN. (2005a) It's too difficult! Frustration intolerance beliefs and procrastination. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 873–883.
20.
HarringtonN. (2005b) The Frustration Discomfort Scale: development and psychometric properties. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 12(5), 374–387.
21.
HarringtonN. (2006) Frustration intolerance beliefs: their relationship with depression, anxiety, and anger, in a clinical population. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 30, 699–709.
22.
KarakitapoğluA. Z.İmamoğluE. O. (2002) Value domains of Turkish adults and university students. Journal of Social Psychology, 142(3), 333–352.
23.
KayahanB.AltintoprakE.KarabilginS.ÖzturkÖ. (2003) On beş-kirk dokuz yaşlarι arasιndaki kadιnlarda depresyon prevalansι ve depresyon şiddeti ile risk faktörleri arasιndaki ilişki [The relationship between risk factors and depression scores, and depression prevalence among women between 15–49 years of age]. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 4, 208–219.
24.
NasserF.WisenbakerJ. (2003) A Monte Carlo study investigating the impact of item parceling on measures of fit in confirmatory fator analysis. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 63, 729–757.
25.
NeenanM.DrydenW. (1999) Rational emotive behaviour therapy: advances in theory and practice.London: Whurr.
26.
OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2004) Academic procrastination and statistics anxiety. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(1), 3–19.
27.
RosenbergM. (1965) Society and the adolescent self-image.Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univer. Press.
28.
SchumackerR. E.LomaxR. G. (1996) A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
SolomonL. J.RothblumE. D. (1984) Academic procrastination: frequency and cognitive-behavioral correlates. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31(4), 503–509.
30.
TabachnickB. G.FidelL. S. (2001) Using multivariate statistics. (4th ed.) London: Allyn & Bacon.
31.
TuckmanB. W. (1989) Procrastination “busting.”Educational Technology, 29, 48–49.
32.
Uzun OzerB. U.DemirA.FerrariJ. R. (2009) Exploring academic procrastination among Turkish students: possible gender differences in prevalence and reasons. Journal of Social Psychology, 149(2), 241–257.
