The unprecedented popularity of online communication has raised interests and concerns among the public as well as in scholarly circles. Online communications have pushed people farther away from one another. This study is a further examination of the effects of online communications on well-being, in particular: Locus of control, Loneliness, Subjective well-being, and Preference for online social interaction. Chinese undergraduate students (N = 260; 84 men, 176 women; M age = 20.1 yr., SD = 1.2) were questioned about demographic information and use of social media as well as four previously validated questionnaires related to well-being. Most participants used QQ, a popular social networking program, as the major channel for online social interactions. Locus of control was positively related to Loneliness and Preference for online social interaction, but negatively related to Subjective well-being; Loneliness (positively) and Subjective well-being (negatively) were related to Preference for online social interaction; and Loneliness and Subjective well-being had a full mediating effect between the relationships of Locus of control and Preference for online social interaction. The findings of the study showed that more lonely, unhappy, and externally controlled students were more likely to be engaged in online social interaction. Improving students' locus of control, loneliness, and happiness may help reduce problematic Internet use.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ApaolazaV.HartmannP.MedinaE.BarrutiaJ. M.EchebarriaC. (2013) The relationship between socializing on the Spanish online networking site Tuenti and teenagers' subjective well-being: the roles of self-esteem and loneliness. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1282–1289.
2.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1186.
3.
CaplanS. E. (2002) Problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being: development of a theory-based cognitive-behavioral measurement instrument. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 553–575.
4.
CaplanS. E. (2003) Preference for online social interaction: a theory of problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being. Communication Research, 30, 625–648.
5.
CaplanS. E. (2005) A social skill account of problematic Internet use. Journal of Communication, 55, 721–736.
6.
CaplanS. E. (2007) Relation among loneliness, social anxiety, and problematic Internet use. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10, 234–242.
7.
CaplanS. E. (2010) Theory and measurement of generalized problematic Internet use: a two-step approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1089–1097.
8.
CasaleS.TellaL.FioravantiG. (2013) Preference for online social interactions among young people: direct and indirect effects of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 524–529.
9.
ChakK.LeungL. (2004) Shyness and locus of control as predictors of Internet addiction and Internet use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7, 559–570.
DienerE. (2011) Happy people live longer: subjective well-being contributes to health and longevity. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 3, 1–43.
13.
FioravantiG.DèttoreD.CasaleS. (2012) Adolescent Internet addiction: testing the association between self-esteem, the perception of Internet attributes and preference for online social interactions. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15, 318–323.
14.
FioriK.BrownE. E.CortinaK. S.AntonucciT. C. (2006) Locus of control as a mediator of the relationship between religiosity and life satisfaction: age, race, and gender differences. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 9, 239–263.
15.
GarcíaM. F.RamírezM. G.JariegoI. M. (2002) Social support and locus of controls as predictors of psychological well-being in Moroccan and Peruvian immigrant women in Spain. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 26, 287–310.
16.
HamburgerY. A.ArtziE. B. (2000) The relationship between extraversion and neuroticism and the different uses of the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 441–449.
17.
HamburgerY. A.ArtziE. B. (2003) Loneliness and Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 71–80.
18.
HawkleyL. C.CacioppoJ. T. (2009) Loneliness. In ReisH.SprecherS. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of human relationships. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Pp. 985–990.
19.
HojatM. (1982) Loneliness as a function of selected personality variables. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 137–141.
20.
HollengbaughE.FerrisA. (2014) Facebook self-disclosure: examining the role of traits, social cohesion, and motives. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 50–58.
21.
KaplanA.HaenleinM. (2010) Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53, 59–68.
22.
KaratasZ.TagayO. (2012) Self-esteem, locus of control and multidimensional perfectionism as the predictors of subjective well-being. International Education Studies, 5, 131–139.
23.
KongH. B.RanR.SongX. H. (2010) The challenges and countermeasures of Internet education in university. Economic Herald, 8, 82–83.
24.
KrautP.PattersonM.LundmarkV.KieslerS.MukopadhyayT.ScherlisW. (1998) Internet paradox: a social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?American Psychologist, 53, 65–77.
25.
KrautR.KieslerS.BonevaB.CummingsJ.HelgesonV.CrawfordA. (2002) Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 49–74.
26.
KrossE.VerduynP.DemiralpE.ParkJ.LeeD. S.LinN.ShablackH.JonidesJ.YbarraO. (2013) Facebook use predicts declines in subjective well-being in young adults. PLoS ONE, 8, e69841.
27.
LeeG.LeeJ.KwonS. (2011) Use of social-networking sites and subjective well-being: a study in South Korea. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14, 151–155.
28.
McKennaK. Y. A.GreenA. S.GleasonM. E. J. (2002) Relationship formation on the Internet: what's the big attraction?Journal of Social Issues, 58, 9–31.
29.
Morahan-MartinJ.SchumacherP. (2000) Incidence and correlates of pathological Internet use among college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 13–29.
30.
NadkarniA.HofmannS. G. (2012) Why do people use Facebook?Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 243–249.
31.
NithyaH. M.JuliusS. (2007) Extroversion, neuroticism and self-concept: their impact on Internet users in India. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1322–1328.
32.
NormanC. D. (2012) Social media and health promotion. Global Health Promotion, 4, 3–6.
33.
PapacharissiZ.RubinA. M. (2000) Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44, 175–196.
34.
RotterJ. B. (1966) Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monograph, 80, 1–28.
35.
RussellD.PeplauL. A.CutronaC. E. (1980) The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 472–480.
36.
SeidmanG. (2013) Self-presentation and belonging on Facebook: how personality influences social media use and motivations. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 402–407.
ValenzuelaS.ParkN.KeeK. F. (2009) Is there social capital in a social network site? Facebook use and college students' life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 875–901.
39.
WangX. D.WangX. L.MaH. (1999) Rating scales for mental health. Beijing, PRC: Chinese Mental Health Journal Press.
