Event Valence and Estimates of Own,Average Person's,and Randomly Chosen Person's Risk

Abstract

People typically believe they have a lower likelihood of experiencing negative events and a greater likelihood of experiencing positive events than does the average person. This effect is greater for negative than positive events. It has been proposed that this is a by-product of a tendency for estimates of the average person's likelihood to increase with the size of the group concerned. If so, event valence should affect estimates of the average person's likelihood, but not estimates of one's own likelihood or estimates of the likelihood of a person selected at random. These predictions were tested for a single event using a student sample (N = 113). Results were not in accord with the proposal. An explanation in terms of motivational processes is offered instead.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Gold

R. S.

, & Brown

M. G.

(2009) Explaining the effect of event valence on unrealistic optimism. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 14, 262–272.

Gold

R. S.

, & Martyn

(2003) Event valence and unrealistic optimism. Psychological Reports, 92, 1105–1109.

Gold

R. S.

, & Martyn

(2004) Event valence and unrealistic optimism: further evidence. Psychological Reports, 95, 464–466.

Kahneman

, & Tversky

(1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.

Price

P. C.

Smith

A. R.

, & Lench

H. C.

(2006) The effect of target group size on risk judgments and comparative optimism: the more, the riskier. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 382–398.