Sport fans often foster very positive attitudes for their favorite teams and less favorable attitudes for opponents. The current research was designed to evaluate the consistency that might exist between implicit and explicit measures of those attitudes. College students (24 women, 16 men) performed a version of the Implicit Association Test related to their favorite and rival teams. Participants also reported their attitudes for these teams explicitly, via self-report instruments. When responding to the IAT, participants' responses were faster when they paired positive words with concepts related to favorite teams and negative words with rival teams, indicating implicit favorability for favorite teams and implicit negativity for rival teams. This pattern of implicit favorability and negativity was consistent with what participants reported explicitly via self-report. The importance of evaluating implicit attitudes and the corresponding consistency with explicit attitudes are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AartsH.CustersR.MarienH. (2008) Preparing and motivating behavior outside of awareness. Science, 319, 1639.
2.
AndersonJ. R. (1992) Automaticity and the ACT-Super(*) theory. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 165–180.
3.
BanajiM. R. (2001) Implicit attitudes can be measured. In RoedigerH. L.IIINairneJ. S.NeathI.SurprenantA. M. (Eds.), The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Pp. 117–150.
4.
BanajiM. R.LemmK. M.CarpenterS. J. (2004) The social unconscious. In BrewerM. B.HewstoneM. (Eds.), Social cognition. Maiden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. Pp. 28–53.
5.
BarghJ. A.ChenM.BurrowsL. (1996) Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230–244.
6.
BlairI. V. (2001) Implicit stereotypes and prejudice. In MoskowitzG. B. (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: Princeton symposium on the legacy and future of social cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 359–374.
7.
CialdiniR. B.BordenR. J.ThorneA.WalkerM. R.FreemanS.SloanL. R. (1976) Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 366–375.
8.
CottinghamM. D. (2012) Interaction ritual theory and sports fans: Emotions, symbols, and solidarity. Sociology of Sport Journal, 29, 168–185.
9.
DeHouwerJ.Teige-MocigembaS.SpruytA.MoorsA. (2009) Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 347–368.
10.
DevineP. G. (1989) Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18.
11.
DovidioJ. F.FazioR. H. (1992) New technologies for the direct and indirect assessment of attitudes. In TanurJ. M. (Ed.), Questions about questions: Inquiries into the cognitive bases of surveys. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Pp. 204–237.
12.
DovidioJ. F.KawakamiK.JohnsonC.JohnsonB.HowardA. (1997) On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 510–540.
13.
FrancoF. M.MaassA. (1996) Implicit and explicit strategies of out-group discrimination: The role of intentional control in biased language use and reward allocation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15, 335–359.
14.
GreenwaldA. G.BanajiM. R.RudmanL. A.FarnhamS. D.NosekB. A.MellottD. S. (2002) A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109, 3–25.
15.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E.SchwartzJ. L. K. (1998) Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.
16.
HavardC. T.GrayD. P.GouldJ.SharpL. A.SchafferJ. J. (2013) Development and validation of the Sport Rivalry Fan Perception Scale (SRFPS). Journal of Sport Behavior, 36, 45–65.
HirtE. R.ZillmanD.EricksonG. A.KennedyC. (1992) Costs and benefits of allegiance: Changes in fans' self-ascribed competencies after team victory versus defeat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 724–738.
19.
KarpinskiA.HiltonJ. L. (2001) Attitudes and the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 774–788.
20.
KawakamiK.YoungH.DovidioJ. (2002) Automatic stereotyping: Category, trait, and behavioral activations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 3–15.
21.
MelnickM. J.WannD. L. (2011) An examination of sport fandom in Australia: Socialization, team identification, and fan behavior. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 46, 456–470.
22.
NosekB. A.BanajiM. R.GreenwaldA. G. (2002) Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site. Group Dynamics, 6, 101–115.
23.
NosekB. A.GreenwaldA. C.BanajiM. R. (2007) The Implicit Association Test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review. In BarghJ. A. (Ed.), Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of higher mental processes. New York: Psychology Press. Pp. 265–292.
24.
OlsonM. A.FazioR. H. (2008) Implicit and explicit measures of attitudes: The perspective of the MODE model. In PettyR. E.FazioR. H.BrinolP. (Eds.), Attitudes: Insights from new implicit measures. New York: Psychology Press. Pp. 19–63.
25.
PopeS. (2013) The love of my life: The meaning and importance of sport for female fans. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 37, 176–195.
26.
QuekB-K.OrtonyA. (2012) Assessing implicit attitudes: What can be learned from simulations?Social Cognition, 30, 610–630.
27.
RobertsM. (1976) Fans: How we go crazy over sports. Washington, DC: New Republic.
28.
RudmanL. A.GreenwaldA. G.MellottD. S.SchwartzJ. L. K. (1999) Measuring the automatic components of prejudice: Flexibility and generality of the Implicit Association Test. Social Cognition, 17, 437–465.
29.
SchneiderW. (1988) Micro experimental laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 20, 206–217.
30.
SchurrK. T.RubleV. E.EllenA. S. (1985) Myers-Briggs type inventory and demographic characteristics of students attending and not attending a college basketball game. Journal of Sport Behavior, 8, 181–194.
31.
StevensS.RosenbergerP. J. (2012) The influence of involvement, following sport and fan identification on fan loyalty: An Australian perspective. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 13, 220–234.
32.
SwansonJ. E.RudmanL. A.GreenwaldA. G. (2001) Using the Implicit Association Test to investigate attitude-behavior consistency for stigmatized behavior. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 207–230.
33.
TajfelH. (1981) Human groups and social categories. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univer. Press.
34.
WannD. L. (1997) Sport psychology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
35.
WannD. L. (2006) Examining the potential causal relationship between sport team identification and psychological well-being. Journal of Sport Behavior, 29, 79–95.
36.
WannD. L.BranscombeN. R. (1990) Diehard and fair-weather fans: Effects of identification on BIRGing and CORFing tendencies. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 14, 103–117.
37.
WannD. L.BranscombeN. R. (1993) Sports fans: Measuring degree of identification with their team. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 24, 1–17.
38.
WannD. L.DolanT. J.McGeorgeK. K.AllisonJ. A. (1994) Relationships between spectator identification and spectators' perceptions of influence, spectators' emotions, and competition outcome. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 16, 347–364.
39.
WannD. L.HunterJ. L.RyanJ. A.WrightL. A. (2001) The relationship between team identification and willingness of sport fans to consider illegally assisting their team. Social Behavior and Personality, 29, 531–536.
40.
WannD. L.RoyaltyJ.RobertsA. (2000) The self-presentation of sport fans: Investigating the importance of team identification and self-esteem. Journal of Sport Behavior, 25, 207–216.
41.
WengerJ. L.BotaK. N.OderaP. (2012) Evaluating implicit sentiments for sinners and sins: A cross-cultural investigation. International Journal for Psychological Studies, 4, 19–27.
42.
WittenbrinkB.JuddC. M.ParkB. (1997) Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationship with questionnaire measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 262–274.
