Findings from a pilot study investigating the influence of the interests of young children with autism on parents' provision of everyday informal child learning opportunities are described. 17 children (13 boys, 4 girls) were divided into two groups that received everyday learning opportunities of Low interest and High interest, based on parents' bi-weekly ratings of the interestingness of the opportunities to the children, using an investigator-developed measure. A brief intervention of 12 to 14 weeks showed that the children in the High interest-based group were provided more learning opportunities than were the Low interest-based group, and that the parents indicated that their children benefited more from the learning opportunities. Implications for future research are described.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BakerM. J. (2000) Incorporating the thematic ritualistic behaviors of children with autism into games: increasing social play interactions with siblings. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 66–84.
2.
BoydB. A.ConroyM. A.MancilG. R.NakaoT., & AlterP. J. (2007) Effects of circumscribed interests on the social behaviors of children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1550–1561.
3.
BronfenbrennerU. (1992) Ecological systems theory. In VastaR. (Ed.), Six theories of child development: revised formulations and current issues. Philadelphia: Jessica Kings ley. Pp. 187–248.
4.
BronfenbrennerU. (1999) Environments in developmental perspective: theoretical and operational models. In FriedmanS. L. & WachsT. D. (Eds.), Measuring environment across the life span: emerging methods and concepts. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Pp. 3–28.
5.
CohenJ. (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
DawsonG., & OsterlingJ. (1997) Early intervention in autism. In GuralnickM. J. (Ed.), The effectiveness of early intervention. Baltimore: Brookes. Pp. 307–326.
7.
DixonW., (Ed.) (1992) BMDP statistical software manual. Vol. 2. Berkeley, CA: Univer. of California Press.
8.
DunstC. J.BruderM. B.TrivetteC. M.HambyD.RaabM., & McLeanM. (2001) Characteristics and consequences of everyday natural learning opportunities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 21, 68–92.
9.
DunstC. J.BruderM. B.TrivetteC. M., & HambyD. W. (2005) Young children's natural learning environments: contrasting approaches to early childhood intervention indicate differential learning opportunities. Psychological Reports, 96, 231–234.
10.
DunstC. J.HambyD.TrivetteC. M.RaabM., & BruderM. B. (2000) Everyday family and community life and children's naturally occurring learning opportunities. Journal of Early Intervention, 23, 151–164.
11.
FarverJ. A. M. (1999) Activity setting analysis: a model for examining the role of culture in development. In GöncüA. (Ed.), Children's engagement in the world: sociocultural perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univer. Press. Pp. 99–127.
12.
HauserR. M. (1994) Measuring socioeconomic status in studies of child development. Child Development, 65, 1541–1545.
13.
HoyleR. H. (1999) Statistical strategies for small simple research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
HreskoW.MiguelS.SherbenouR., & BurtonS. (1994) Developmental Observation Checklist System: a systems approach to assessing very young children: examiner's manual. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
15.
KoegelR. L.DyerK., & BellL. K. (1987) The influence of child-preferred activities on autistic children's social behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 243–252.
16.
KrugD. A.ArickJ. R., & AlmondP. G. (1980) Behavior checklist for identifying severely handicapped individuals with high levels of autistic behavior. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 21, 221–229.
17.
PreacherK. J.RuckerD. D.MacCallumR. C., & NicewanderW. A. (2005) Use of the extreme groups approach: a critical reexamination and new recommendations. Psychological Methods, 10, 178–192.
18.
RaabM., & DunstC. J. (2007) Influence of child interests on variations in child behavior and functioning (Winterberry Research Syntheses Vol. 1, No. 21). Asheville, NC: Winterberry Press.
19.
RenningerK. A. (1992) Individual interest and development: implications for theory and practice. In RenningerK. A.HidiS., & KrappA. (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 361–395.
20.
RogoffB.MistryJ.GöncüA., & MosierC. (1993) Guided participation in cultural activity by toddlers and caregivers. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58(8).
21.
RosenthalR. (1994) Parametric measures of effect size. In CooperH. & HedgesL. V. (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Pp. 231–244.
22.
RutterM.LeCouteurA., & LordC. (2003) Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised (ADI-R). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
23.
SchoplerE.ReichlerR., & RennerB. R. (1993) Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
24.
ThompsonB. (2001) Significance, effect sizes, stepwise methods, and other issues: strong arguments move the field. Journal of Experimental Education, 70, 80–93.
25.
TrivetteC. M.DunstC. J., & HambyD. (2004) Sources of variation in and consequences of everyday activity settings on child and parenting functioning. Perspectives in Education, 22(2), 17–35.
26.
TudgeJ.HoganD.LeeS.TammeveskiP.MeltsasM.KulakovaN.SnezhkovaI., & PutnamS. (1999) Cultural heterogeneity: parental values and beliefs and their preschoolers' activities in the United States, South Korea, Russia, and Estonia. In GöncüA. (Ed.), Children's engagement in the world: sociocultural perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univer. Press. Pp. 62–96.
27.
Vacha-HaaseT., & ThompsonB. (2004) How to estimate and interpret various effect sizes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 473–481.
28.
ValentineJ. C., & CooperH. (2003) Effect size substantive interpretation guidelines: issues in the interpretation of effect sizes. Washington, DC: What Works Clearinghouse.
29.
VismaraL. A., & LyonsG. L. (2007) Using perseverative interests to elicit joint attention behaviors in young children with autism: theoretical and clinical implications for understanding motivation. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9, 214–228.
30.
WilliamsE.Kendell-ScottL., & CostallA. (2005) Parents' experiences of introducing everyday object use to their children with autism. Autism: the International Journal of Research and Practice, 9, 495–514.
