A hypothesis was examined, that gelotophobia (the fear of being laughed at) was negatively related to Type I thinking styles and positively related to Type II thinking styles as defined in Sternberg's theory of mental self-government. 431 university students (250 women, 181 men; M age = 20.4 yr., SD = 1.2) completed self-report measures of gelotophobia (GELOPH < 15 >) and thinking styles (Thinking Styles Inventory-Revised). Correlation and regression analyses were conducted. The results indicated that gelotophobia was negatively and significantly related to four Type I thinking styles (legislative, judicial, liberal, and hierarchical thinking styles) and a Type III thinking style (external), while it was positively and significantly related to a Type II thinking style (conservative). Thinking styles uniquely explained 18% of the total variance in gelotophobia scores. Possible interventions from the perspective of thinking styles in the treatment of gelotophobia were discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ChenG-H.LiaoC-C.ProyerR. T.RuchW. (2010) [Gelotophobia in China: on the assessment of the fear of being laughed at]. China Journal of Health Psychology, 18, 887–889. [in Chinese]
2.
ChenG-H.ZhangL-F. (2010) Mental health and thinking styles in Sternberg's theory: an exploratory study. Psychological Reports, 107, 784–794.
3.
FanW-Q. (2006) Thinking syles among university students in Shanghai: a comparison of traditional and hypermedia instructional environments. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Hong Kong.
4.
ForaboscoG.RuchW.NuceraP. (2009) The fear of being laughed at among psychiatric patients. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 22(1-2), 233–251.
5.
KaganJ. (1976) Commentary on reflective and impulsive children: strategies of information processing underlying differences in problem solving. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 41(5), 48–52.
6.
KlineT. J. B.SulskyL. M.Rever-MoriyamaS. (2000) Common method variance and specification errors: a practical approach to detection. The Journal of Psychology, 134(4), 401–421.
7.
PlattT.RuchW. (2009) The emotions of gelotophobes: shameful, fearful, and joyless?Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 22(1-2), 91–110.
8.
ProyerR. T.HempelmannC. F.RuchW. (2009) Were they really laughed at? That much? Gelotophobes and their history of perceived derisibilityHumor: International Journal of Humor Research, 22(1-2), 213–231.
9.
ProyerR. T.RuchW. (2009a) How virtuous are gelotophobes? Self- and peer-reported character strengths among those who fear being laughed at. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 22(1-2), 145–163.
10.
ProyerR. T.RuchW. (2009b) Intelligence and gelotophobia: the relations of self-estimated and psychometrically measured intelligence to the fear of being laughed at. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 22(1-2), 165–181.
11.
ProyerR. T.RuchW.AliN. S.Al-OlimatH. S.Andualem AdalT.Aziz AnsariS. (2009) Breaking ground in cross-cultural research on the fear of being laughed at (gelotophobia): a multi-national study involving 73 countries. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 22(1/2), 253–279.
12.
ProyerR. T.RuchW.ChenG-H. (2012) Positive psychology and the fear of being laughed at: gelotophobia and its relations to orientations to happiness and life satisfaction in Austria, China, and Switzerland. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 25(1), 23–40.
13.
RuchW. (2009) Gelotophobia: the fear of being laughed at. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 22(1/2), 1–25.
14.
RuchW.ProyerR. T. (2008a) The fear of being laughed at: individual and group differences in gelotophobia. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 21(1), 47–67.
15.
RuchW.ProyerR. T. (2008b) Who is gelotophobic? Assessment criteria for the fear of being laughed at. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 67(1), 19–27.
16.
RuchW.ProyerR. T. (2009) Who fears being laughed at? The location of gelotophobia in the Eysenckian PEN-model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(5-6), 627–630.
17.
SternbergR. J. (1988) Mental self-government: a theory of intellectual styles and their development. Human Development, 31, 197–224.
TitzeM. (1996) The Pinocchio complex: overcoming the fear of laughter. Humor and Health Journal, 5, 1–11.
20.
TitzeM. (2009) Gelotophobia: the fear of being laughed at. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 22(1/2), 27–48.
21.
WitkinH. A. (1964) Origins of cognitive style. In Constance Sheerer (Ed.), Cognition, theory, research, promise. New York: Harper & Row. Pp. 172–205.
22.
YangS. C.LinW. C. (2004) The relationship among creative, critical thinking and thinking styles in Taiwan high school students. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31(1), 33–45.
23.
ZhangL-F. (1999) Further cross-cultural validation of the theory of mental self-government. The Journal of Psychology, 133(2), 165–181.
24.
ZhangL-F. (2000) Abilities, academic performance, learning approaches, and thinking styles: a three-culture investigation. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 1(2), 123–149.
25.
ZhangL-F. (2001) Approaches and thinking styles in teaching. The Journal of Psychology, 135, 547–561.
26.
ZhangL-F. (2003) Does the Big Five predict learning approaches?Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1431–1446.
27.
ZhangL-F. (2004) Field-dependence/independence: cognitive style or perceptual ability? Validating against thinking styles and academic achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1295–1311.
28.
ZhangL-F. (2005a) Does teaching for a balanced use of thinking styles enhance students' achievement?Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1135–1147.
29.
ZhangL-F. (2005b) Validating the theory of mental self-government in a non-academic setting. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1915–1925.
30.
ZhangL-F. (2009) Anxiety and thinking styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 347–351.
31.
ZhangL-F. (2010) Further investigating thinking styles and psychosocial development in the Chinese higher education context. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 593–603.
32.
ZhangL-F.PostiglioneG. A. (2001) Thinking styles, self-esteem, and social-economic status. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 1333–1346.
33.
ZhangL-F.SternbergR. J. (2000) Are learning approaches and thinking styles related? A study in two Chinese populations. The Journal of Psychology, 134, 469–489.
34.
ZhangL-F.SternbergR. J. (2006) The nature of intellectual styles. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35.
ZhangL-F.SternbergR. J. (2009) Perspectives on the nature of intellectual styles. New York: Springer.
