This study demonstrates the negative moderating effect of general self-efficacy on the relationship between need for cognition, which refers to stable individual differences in people's tendencies to engage in and enjoy cognitive activity, and cognitive effort. This negative moderating effect of general self-efficacy has been termed “plasticity.” Scholars assume the relationship between need for cognition and cognitive effort is true by definition. The study uses data from 144 U.S. college students and employs moderated regression analysis followed by subgroup analysis to demonstrate plasticity. The results set a boundary condition to the generally presumed relationship between need for cognition and cognitive effort, thereby improving the understanding of how these phenomena are related.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AikenL. S., & WestS. G. (1991) Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
BanduraA. (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
3.
BanduraA. (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
BarlingJ., & BeattieR. (1983) Self-efficacy beliefs and sales performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 5, 41–51.
5.
BrocknerJ. (1988) Self-esteem at work: research, theory, and practice. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
6.
CacioppoJ. T., & PettyR. E. (1982) The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131.
7.
CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E.FeinsteinJ. A., & JarvisW. B. G. (1996) Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: the life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197–253.
8.
ChenG.GullyS. M., & EdenD. (2001) Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 62–83.
9.
CombsG. M., & LuthansF. (2007) Diversity training: analysis of the impact of self-efficacyHuman Resource Development Quarterly, 18, 91–120.
10.
EdenD. (1988) Pygmalion, goal setting, and expectancy: compatible ways to boost productivity. Academy of Management Review, 13, 639–652.
11.
EdenD., & AviramA. (1993) Self-efficacy training to speed reemployment: helping people to help themselves. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 352–360.
12.
EdenD., & ZukY. (1995) Seasickness as a self-fulfilling prophecy: raising self-efficacy to boost performance at sea. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 628–635.
13.
FestingerL. (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univer. Press.
14.
FiskeS. T., & TaylorS. E. (1984) Social cognition. New York: Random House.
15.
GarbarinoE. C., & EdellJ. A. (1997) Cognitive effort, affect, and choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 147–158.
16.
HaugtvedtC. P., & PettyR. E. (1992) Personality and persuasion: need for cognition moderates the persistence and resistance of attitude changes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 308–319.
17.
JohnsonE. J.PayneJ. W., & BettmanJ. R. (1988) Information displays and preference reversals. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 42, 1–21.
18.
JudgeT. A.LockeE. A., & DurhamC. C. (1997) The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: a core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 151–188.
19.
KanferR., & HeggestadE. D. (1997) Motivational traits and skills: a person-centered approach to work motivation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 1–56.
20.
KimH. M., & KramerT. (2006) The moderating effects of need for cognition and cognitive effort on responses to multi-dimensional prices. Marketing Letters, 17, 193–203.
21.
KormanA. K. (1970) Toward an hypothesis of work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 31–41.
22.
LordK. R., & PutrevuS. (2006) Exploring the dimensionality of the Need for Cognition Scale. Psychology and Marketing, 23, 11–34.
23.
MaurerT. J., & PierceH. R. (1998) A comparison of Likert scale and traditional measures of self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 324–329.
24.
NanX. (2009) The influence of source credibility on attitude certainty: exploring the moderating effects of timing of source identification and individual need for cognition. Psychology and Marketing, 26, 321–332.
25.
NewellA., & SimonH. A. (1990) Computer science as empirical enquiry: symbols and search. In GarfieldJ. L. (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science: the essential readings. New York: Paragon. Pp. 113–138.
26.
PettyR. E., & CacioppoJ. T. (1986) Communication and persuasion: central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
27.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T., & SchumannD. (1983) Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: the moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 135–146.
28.
PierceJ. L.GardnerD. G.DunhamR. B., & CummingsL. L. (1993) Moderation by organization-based self-esteem of role condition–employee response relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 271–288.
29.
PriesterJ. R., & PettyR. E. (1995) Source attribution and persuasion: perceived honesty as a determinant of message scrutiny. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 637–654.
30.
RussoJ. E., & DosherB. A. (1983) Strategies for multiattribute binary choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 676–696.
31.
SaksA. M., & AshforthB. E. (2000) The role of dispositions, entry stressors, and behavioral plasticity theory in predicting newcomers' adjustment to work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 43–62.
32.
SheltonS. H. (1990) Developing the construct of general self-efficacyPsychological Reports, 66, 987–994.
33.
ShererM.MadduxJ. E.MercandanteB.Prentice-DunnS.JacobsB., & RogersR. W. (1982) The Self-efficacy Scale: construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51, 663–671.
34.
SojkaJ., & GieseJ. (2001) The influence of personality traits on the processing of visual and verbal information. Marketing Letters, 12, 91–106.
35.
StajkovicA. D., & LuthansF. (1998) Self-efficacy and work-related performance: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 240–261.
36.
SwannW. B. (1996) Self-traps: the elusive quest for higher self-esteem. New York: West-view.
37.
ZhangY. (1996) Responses to humorous advertising: the moderating effect of need for cognition. Journal of Advertising, 25, 15–32.
