This study examined the psychometric properties of a newly translated Italian version of the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised (ECR–R) Scale. The sample comprised 1,363 adults (906 women, 456 men, 1 unreported sex; ages 18–64 yr., M=33.4, SD=8.9; 84.4% reported being engaged in a romantic relationship, 9.4% declared being single), all living in Italy and speaking Italian as their first language. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses showed the expected bi-factorial (anxiety/avoidance) structure and a close correspondence between factors and scales. Test-retest and internal consistency reliabilities were adequate. Correlations with the Relationship Questionnaire, a categorical measure of attachment, and with the Dyadic Adjustment Scale were consistent with the theoretical relations among the constructs. The findings confirm the transcultural validity of the ECR–R.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AinsworthM. D. S.BleharM.WatersE.WallS. (1978) Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2.
BartholomewK. (1990) Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 147–178.
3.
BartholomewK.HorowitzL. M. (1991) Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226–244.
4.
BowlbyJ. (1988) A secure base: Clinical application of attachment theory. New York: Basic Books.
5.
BrennanK. A.ClarkC. L.ShaverP. R.. (1998) Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S. (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships. New York: Guilford Press. Pp. 46–76.
6.
BrennanK. A.ShaverP. R. (1995) Dimensions of adult attachment, affect regulation, and romantic relationship functioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 267–283.
7.
CarliL. (1995) Attaccamento e rapporto di coppia [Attachment and couple relationships]. Milan, Italy: Raffaello Cortina Editore.
8.
CalvoV. (2008) Il questionario ECR–R: Aspetti di validazione della versione italiana dello strumento [The ECR-R questionnaire: Aspects of validation of the Italian version of the instrument]. In Atti del X Congresso Nazionale AIP: Sezione Clinica-Dinamica, Padova. Pp. 275–279.
9.
CassidyJ.ShaverP. R. (Eds.) (2008) Handbook ofattachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications. (2nd ed.) New York: Guilford Press.
10.
CollinsN. L.ReadS. J. (1990) Adult attachment, working models and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(4), 644–663.
11.
CrossS. E.MadsonL. (1997) Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5–37.
12.
DazziN.ZavattiniG. C.. (2011) Il paradigma dell'attaccamento e la pratica clinica [The paradigm of attachment and the clinical practice]. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia [Italian Journal of Psychology], 38(4), 729–756.
13.
EhrenthalJ. C.DingerU.LamlaA.FunkenB.SchauenburgH. (2009) Evaluation der deutschsprachigen version des bindungsfragebogens “Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised” (ECR–R) [Evaluation of the German version of the attachment questionnaire “Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised” (ECR-RD)]. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie [Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics, and Medical Psychology], 59, 215–223.
14.
FeeneyJ. A.. (1994) Attachment style, communication patterns, and satisfaction across the life cycle of marriage. Personal Relationships, 1, 333–348.
15.
FeeneyJ. A.NollerP.CallanV. J.. (1994) Attachment style, communication and satisfaction in the early years of marriage. In BartholomewK.PerlmanD. (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships. Vol. 5: Adult attachment relationships. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley. Pp. 269–308.
16.
FraleyR. C.HeffernanM. E.VicaryA. M.BrumbaughC. C.. (2011) The Experiences in Close Relationships–Relationship Structures questionnaire: A method for assessing attachment orientations across relationships. Psychological Assessment, 23, 615–625.
17.
FraleyR. C.VicaryA. M.BrumbaughC. C.RoismanG. I.. (2011) Patterns of stability in adult attachment: An empirical test of two models of continuity and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 974–992.
18.
FraleyR. C.WallerN. G.BrennanK. A.. (2000) An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350–365.
19.
GentiliP.ContrerasL.CassanitiM.D'AristaF. (2002) La Dyadic Adjustment Scale: Una misura dell'adattamento di coppia [The Dyadic Adjustment Scale: A measure of couple adjustment]. Minerva Psichiatrica, 43,107–116.
20.
GriffinD.BartholomewK. (1994) Models of the self and other: Fundamental dimensions underlying measure of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 430–445.
21.
HanakN.DimitrijevicA. (2013) A Serbian version of modified and revised Experiences in Close Relationships Scale (SM-ECR–R). Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 530–538.
22.
HazanC.ShaverP R. (1987) Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–523.
23.
HuL.BentlerP. M.. (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
24.
HumbadN. L.DonnellanM. B.IaconoW. G.BurtS. A.. (2010) Marital quality is associated with externalizing personality and psychopathology: Results from a very large sample of married couples. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119, 151–162.
25.
JinY.TangR. (2007) A preliminary study on ECR–R for Chinese college students. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 15, 242–243.
26.
KooimanC. G.KlaassensE. R.van Heloma LugtJ. Q.KampermanA. M. (2013) Psychometrics and validity of the Dutch Experiences in Close–Relationships–Revised (ECR–R) in an outpatient mental health sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 217–224.
27.
KurdekL. A.. (1992) Dimensionality of the dyadic adjustment scale: Evidences from heterosexual and homosexual couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 6, 22–35.
28.
LevyM. B.DavisK. E.. (1988) Love styles and attachment styles compared: Their relations to each other and to various relationships characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 439–471.
29.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R.. (2007) Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York: Guilford Press. Pp. 81–115.
30.
RavitzP.MaunderR.HunterJ.SthankiyaB.LanceeW. (2010) Adult attachment measures: A 25-year review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 69, 419–432.
31.
SantonaA.ZavattiniG. C.. (2005) Partnering and parenting expectations in adoptive couples. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 20(3), 309–322.
32.
ScharfeE.BartholomewK. (1994) Reliability and stability of adult attachment patterns. Personal Relationships, 1, 23–43.
33.
SelcukE.GunaydinG.SumerN.UysalA. (2005) Yetiskin baglanma boyutlan icin yeni bir llcum: Yakin iliskilerde yasantilar envanteri-II'nin Turk ornekleminde psikometrik acidan degerlendirilmesi [A new measure for adult attachment dimensions: The psychometric evaluation of Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised (ECR-R) on a Turkish sample]. Turk Psikoloji Yazilari[Turkish Psychological Articles], 8, 1–11.
34.
SibleyC. G.LiuJ. H.. (2004) Short-term temporal stability and factor structure of the revised Experiences in Close Relationships (ECR–R) measure of adult attachment. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 969–975.
35.
SibleyC. G.FischerR.LiuJ. H.. (2005) Reliability and validity of the revised Experiences in Close Relationships (ECR–R) self-report measure of adult romantic attachment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31,1524–1536.
36.
SimpsonJ. A.. (1990) Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 971–980.
37.
SpanierG. B.. (1976) Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38,15–28.
38.
SteigerJ. H.LindJ. C.. (1980) Statistically based tests for the numbers of factors. Paper presented at the annual spring meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA, May 30.
39.
TsagarakisM.KafetsiosK.StalikasA. (2007) Reliability and validity of the Greek version of the revised Experiences in Close Relationships measure of adult attachment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 47–55.
40.
VaughnM. J.BaierM. E. M.. (1999) Reliability and validity of the Relationship Assessment Scale. American Journal of Family Therapy, 27,137–147.
41.
VelottiP.CastellanoR.ZavattiniG. C.. (2011) Adjustment of couples following childbirth: The role of generalized and specific states of mind in an Italian sample. European Psychologist, 16, 1–11.
42.
WhismanM. A.UebelackerL. A.WeinstockL. M.. (2004) Psychopathology and marital satisfaction: The importance of evaluating both partners. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(5), 830–838.
43.
WongpakaranT.WongpakaranN.WannaritK. (2011) Validity and reliability of the Thai version of the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised questionnaire. Singapore Medical Journal, 52,100–106.
