This study examined the extent the Big Five personality traits and emotional intelligence can be faked. Using a student sample, the equivalence of measurement and theoretical structure of models in a faking and honest condition was tested. Comparisons of the models for the honest and faking groups showed the data fit better in the faking condition. These results suggest that faking does change the rank orders of high scoring participants. The personality dimensions most affected by faking were emotional stability and conscientiousness within the Big Five and the general mood and stress management dimensions of Bar-On's Emotional Quotient Inventory–Short Form (1997) measure of emotional intelligence.
BarrickM. R.MountM. K. (1991) The Big Five personality dimensions of job performance: a meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.
4.
BarrickM. R.MountM. K. (2005) Yes, personality matters: moving on to more important matters. Human Performance, 18, 359–372.
5.
BentlerP. M. (1990) Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
6.
BirkelandS. A.MansonT. M.KisamoreJ. L.BrannickM. T.SmithM. A. (2006) A meta-analytic investigation of job applicant faking on personality measures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 317–334.
7.
BrownM. W.CudeckR. (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model ft. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Pp. 136–162.
8.
ByrneB. M. (2004) Testing for multigroup invariance using AMOS graphics: a road less traveled. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 272–300.
9.
CellarD. F.MillerM. L.DoverspikeD. D.KlawskyJ. D. (1996) Comparison of factor structures and criterion-related validity coefficients for two measures of personality based on the five factor model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 694–704.
10.
DayA.CarrollS. (2008) Faking emotional intelligence (EI): comparing response distortion on ability and trait-based EI measures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 761–784.
11.
DouglasE. F.McDanielM. A.SnellA. F. (1996) The validity of non-cognitive measures decays when applicants fake. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Cincinnati, OH.
12.
DrasgowF.KanferR. (1985) Equivalence of psychological measurement in heterogeneous populations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 662–680.
13.
EllingsonJ. E.SmithD. B.SackettP. R. (1999) Social desirability corrections in personality measurement: issues of applicant comparison and construct validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 155–166.
14.
GolemanD. (1995) Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam.
15.
GolemanD. (1998) Working with emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam.
16.
GowingM. K. (2001) Measurement of individual emotional competence. In ChernissC.GolemanD. (Eds.), The emotionally intelligent workplace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Pp. 83–131.
17.
GriffinB.HeskethB.GraysonD. (2004) Applicants faking good: evidence of item bias in the NEO-PI–R. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1545–1558.
18.
GriffithR. L.FreiR. L.SnellA. F.HamillL. S.WheelerJ. K. (1997) Warnings versus no-warnings: differential effect of method bias. Paper presented at the 12th Annual Conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, St. Louis, MO.
19.
GriffithR. L.SnellA. F.McDanielM. A.DouglasE. F. (1997) Faking of noncognitive measures: factor invariance using multiple groups LISREL. Paper presented at the 12th Annual Conference for the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, St. Louis, MO.
20.
GrubbW. L.IIIMcDanielM. (2007) The fakability of Bar-On's Emotional Quotient Inventory Short Form: catch me if you can. Human Performance, 20, 43–59.
21.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
22.
International Personality Item Pool. (2001) A scientific collaboratory for the development of advanced measures of personality traits and other individual differences. Accessed at http://ipip.ori.org/.
23.
JaeJ. H. (1997) Emotional intelligence and cognitive ability as predictors of job performance in the banking sector. Unpublished master's thesis, Ateneo de Manila Univer., Philippines.
24.
JoreskogK. G. (1971a) Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36, 409–426.
25.
JoreskogK. G. (1971b) Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika, 36, 109–133.
LautenschlagerG. J. (1994) Accuracy and faking of background data. In StokesG. S.MumfordM. D.OwensW. A. (Eds.), Biodata handbook. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Pp. 391–419.
28.
LearyM. R.KowalskiR. M. (1990) Impression management: a literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 34–47.
29.
LyonsJ. B.SchneiderT. R. (2005) The influence of emotional intelligence on performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 693–703.
30.
MathieuJ. E.FarrJ. L. (1991) Further evidence for the discriminant validity of measures of organizational commitment, job involvement, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 127–133.
31.
MayerJ. D. (2001) A field guide to emotional intelligence. In CiarrochiJ.ForgasJ. P.MayerJ. D. (Eds.), Emotional intelligence in everyday life: a scientific inquiry. Philadelphia: Psychology Press. Pp. 3–24.
MayerJ. D.SaloveyP.CarusoD. (2000b) Models of emotional intelligence. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence. New York: Cambridge Univer. Press. Pp. 396–420.
34.
McDanielM. A.NguyenN. T. (2001) Situational judgment tests: a review of practice and constructs assessed. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 103–113.
35.
McFarlandL. A.RyanA. M. (2000) Variance in faking across noncognitive measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 812–821.
36.
McFarlandL. A.RyanA. M.EllisA. (2002) Item placement on a personality measure: effects on faking behavior and test measurement properties. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 348–369.
37.
MoormanR. H.BlakelyG. L.NiehoffB. P. (1998) Does organizational support mediate the relationship between procedural justice and organizational citizenship behavior? A group value model explanation. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 351–357.
38.
MorgesonF. P.CampionM. A.DipboyeR. L.HollenbeckJ. R.MurphyK.SchmittN. (2007a) Are we getting fooled again? Coming to terms with limitations in the use of personality tests for personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 60, 1029–1049.
39.
MorgesonF. P.CampionM. A.DipboyeR. L.HollenbeckJ. R.MurphyK.SchmittN. (2007b) Reconsidering the use of personality tests in personnel selection contexts. Personnel Psychology, 60, 683–729.
40.
MoyerD. M.GordonR. M.WardJ. T.BurkhardtB. B. (2006) Characteristics of successful fakers versus unsuccessful fakers: is empathy, intelligence, or personality associated with faking PTSD on the MMPI–2?Psychological Reports, 99, 747–750.
41.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H. (1994) Psychometric theory. (3rd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.
42.
RoseteD.CiarrochiJ. (2005) Emotional intelligence and its relationship to workplace performance. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 26, 388–399.
43.
RosseJ. G.StecherM. D.MillerJ. L.LevinR. A. (1998) The impact of response distortion on preemployment personality testing and hiring decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 634–644.
44.
SchmitM. R.RyanA. M. (1993) The Big Five in personnel selection: factor structure in applicant and nonapplicant populations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 966–974.
45.
SiscoH.ReillyR. R. (2007) Five factor biodata inventory: resistance to faking. Psychological Reports, 101, 3–17.
46.
SnellA. F.SydellE. J.LuekeS. (1999) Towards a theory of applicant faking: integrating studies of deception. Human Resource Management Review, 9, 219–242.
47.
VandenbergR. J.LanceC. E. (2000) A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–69.
48.
VasilopoulosN. L.CucinaJ. M.McElreathJ. M. (2005) Do warnings of response verification moderate the relationship between personality and cognitive ability?Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 306–322.
49.
ViswesvaranC.OnesD. S. (1999) Meta-analyses of fakability estimates: implications for personality measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 197–210.
50.
ZeidnerM.MatthewsG.RobertsR. D. (2004) Emotional intelligence in the workplace: a critical review. Applied Psychology: an International Review, 53, 371–399.
