The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) provides standardized scores for adults ages 20 to 89 years. However, there are situations in which the use of the RBANS for adults ages 18 to 20 years may be appropriate and have practical advantages. Thus, at present, an examiner who uses the RBANS for adult patients must rely on an entirely different evaluation tool for those adult patients under the age of 20 years. This preliminary investigation suggests the RBANS is a valid measure for men ages 18 to 20 years.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CarlozziN. E.HornerM. D.YangC., & TileyB. C. (2008) Factor analysis of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status. Applied Neuropsychology, 15, 274–279.
2.
DuffK.LangbehnD. R.SchoenbergM. R.MoserD. J.BaadeJ. G.MoldJ., & AdamsR. L. (2006) Examining the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status: factor analytic studies in an elderly sample. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 14, 976–979.
KaneR. L.ParsonsO. A.GoldsteinG., & MosesJ. A. (1987) Diagnostic accuracy of the Halstead–Reitan and Luria–Nebraska neuropsychological batteries: performance of clinical raters. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 55, 783–784.
5.
KatzL., & GoldsteinG. (1993) The Luria–Nebraska Neuropsychology Battery and the WAIS–R in assessment of adults with specific learning disabilities. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 36, 190–198.
6.
KaufmanA., & KaufmanN. (2004) Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test. (2nd ed.) Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
7.
LarrabeeG. J.MillisS. R., & MeyersJ. E. (2008) Sensitivity to brain dysfunction of the Halstead–Reitan vs an ability-focused neuropsychological battery. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 22, 813–825.
8.
MittenbergW.KasprisinA., & FarageC. (1985) Localization and diagnosis in aphasia with the Luria–Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 386–392.
9.
PachetA. K. (2007) Construct validity of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) with acquired brain injury patients. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21, 286–293.
10.
RandolphC. (1998) Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
11.
RandolphC.TierneyM. C.MohrE., & ChaseT. N. (1998) The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS): preliminary clinical validity. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 20, 310–319.
12.
SchmittA. L.LivingstonR. B.SmernoffE. N.ReeseE. M.HaferD. G., & HarrisJ. B. (2010) Factor analysis of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status in a large sample of patients suspected of dementia. Applied Neuropsychology, 17, 8–17.
13.
SteinmeyerC. H. (1984) Are the rhythm tests of the Halstead–Reitan and Luria–Nebraska batteries differentially sensitive to right temporal lobe lesions?Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40, 1464–1466.
14.
StrunkK. K. (2009) Neuropsychological functioning, academic achievement, and involvement in head-contact sports. Unpublished master's thesis. Evangel Univer., Springfield, MO.
15.
SweeneyJ. E.SladeH. P.IvinsR. G.NemethD. G.RanksD. M., & SicaR. B. (2007) Scientific investigation of brain-behavior relationships using the Halstead–Reitan battery. Applied Neuropsychology, 14(2), 65–72.
16.
WechslerD. (2009) Wechsler Memory Scale. (4th ed.) San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.