Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The present study compared self-reported transient mood assessment using two different presentations of the sequence of mood scale items. A sample of 300 adults completed the standard Brunel Mood Scale and, after a distraction task, completed an experimental version composed of items grouped along the original subscales. A further 292 adults completed the scales in reverse order. After analysis, no significant differences in response patterns were observed. Results suggested that items sequenced non-randomly and according to mood subscales do not affect the accuracy of transient mood assessment. This suggests that for administration to large groups, the experimental version maintains the psychometric validity of the standard version while at the same time being more time-effective to score.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bischof

Reinhardt

Grothues

Dybek

Meyer

Hapke

John

Rumpf

H-J.

(2005) Effects of item sequence on the performance of the AUDIT in general practices. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 79(3), 373–377.

Paulhus

D. L.

(1991) Measurement and control of response bias. In Robinson

J. P.

Shaver

P. R.

Wrightsman

L. S.

(Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Pp. 17–59.

Peer

Gamliel

(2011) Too reliable to be true? Response bias as a potential source of inflation in paper-and-pencil questionnaire reliability. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 16(9).

Podsakoff

P. M.

MaCkenzie

S. B.

Lee

J-Y.

Podsakoff

N. P.

(2003) Common method bias in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

Podsakoff

P. M.

MacKenzie

S. B.

Podsakoff

N. P.

(2012) Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.

Reinert

D. F.

Allen

J. P.

(2007) The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: an update of research findings. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 31, 185–199.

Terry

P. C.

Lane

A. M.

Fogarty

G. J.

(2003) Construct validity of the POMS–A for use with adults. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 4, 125–139.

Terry

P. C.

Lane

A. M.

Lane

H. J.

Keohane

(1999) Development and validation of a mood measure for adolescents. Journal of Sports Sciences, 17, 861–872.

Terry

P. C.

Potgieter

J. R.

Fogarty

G. J.

(2003) The Stellenbosch Mood Scale: a dual-language measure of mood. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1(3), 231–245.

10.

Terry

P. C.

Stevens

M. J.

Lane

A. M.

(2005) Influence of response time frame on mood assessment. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 18(3), 279–285.

11.

Tourangeau

Rasinski

K. A.

(1988) Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 299–314.

12.

van de Mortel

T. F.

(2008) Faking it: social desirability response bias in self-report research. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25(4), 40–48.

13.

van Wijk

C. H.

(2011) The Brunel Mood Scale: a South African norm study. South African Journal of Psychiatry, 17(2), 44–54.

14.

Watson

(1988) The vicissitudes of mood measurements: effects of varying descriptors, time frames, and response formats on measures of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(1), 128–141.

Influence of Item Sequence on Transient Mood Assessment

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References