An Investigation of Self-Assessment Bias in Mental Health Providers

Abstract

Previous research has consistently found self-assessment bias (an overly positive assessment of personal performance) to be present in a wide variety of work situations. The present investigation extended this area of research with a multi-disciplinary sample of mental health professionals. Respondents were asked to: (a) compare their own overall clinical skills and performance to others in their profession, and (b) indicate the percentage of their clients who improved, remained the same, or deteriorated as a result of treatment with them. Results indicated that 25% of mental health professionals viewed their skill to be at the 90th percentile when compared to their peers, and none viewed themselves as below average. Further, when compared to the published literature, clinicians tended to overestimate their rates of client improvement and underestimate their rates of client deterioration. The implications of this self-assessment bias for improvement of psychotherapy outcomes are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dunning

Heath

Suls

(2004) Flawed self-assessment: implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 69–106.

Ehrlinger

Dunning

(2003) How chronic self-views influence (and potentially mislead) estimates of performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 5–17.

Elaad

(2003) Effects of feedback on the overestimated capacity to detect lies and the underestimated ability to tell lies. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 349–363.

Eysenck

H. J.

(1985) Psychotherapy effects: real or imaginary? American Psychologist, 40, 239–240.

Finch

A. E.

Lambert

M. J.

Schaalje

B. G.

(2001) Psychotherapy quality control: the statistical generation of expected recovery curves for integration into an early warning system. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 8, 231–242.

Grove

W. M.

Meehl

P. E.

(1996) Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionaistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: the clinical–statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 293–323.

Hannan

Lambert

M. J.

Harmon

Nielsen

S. L.

Smart

Shimokawa

K. W.

Sutton

S. W.

(2005) A lab test and algorithms for identifying clients at risk for treatment failure. Journal of Clinical Psychology: In Session, 61, 155–163.

Hansen

N. B.

Lambert

M. J.

Forman

E. V.

(2002) The psychotherapy dose-response effect and its implications for treatment delivery services. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 329–343.

Hawkins

E. J.

Lambert

M. J.

Vermeesch

D. A.

Slade

Tuttle

(2004) The therapeutic effects of providing patient progress information to therapists and patients. Psychotherapy Research, 14, 308–327.

10.

John

O. P.

Robins

R. W.

(1994) Accuracy and bias in self-perception: individual differences in self-enhancement and the role of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 206–219.

11.

Lambert

M. J.

Whipple

J. L.

Vermeersch

D. A.

Smart

D. W.

Hawkins

E. J.

Nielsen

S. L.

Goates

(2002) Enhancing psychotherapy outcomes via providing feedback on client treatment response: a replication. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 9, 91–103.

12.

Meehl

P. E.

(1954) Clinical versus statistical prediction. Minneapolis, MN: Univer. of Minnesota Press.

13.

Meyer

(1980) Self-appraisal of job performance. Personnel Psychology, 33, 291–295.

14.

Okiishi

J. C.

Lambert

M. J.

Eggett

Nielsen

S. L.

Dayton

D. D.

Vermeersch

D. A.

(2006) An analysis of therapist treatment effects: toward providing feedback to individual therapists on their patients' psychotherapy outcome. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 1157–1172.

15.

Spielmans

G. I.

Masters

K. S.

Lambert

M. J.

(2006) A comparison of rational versus empirical methods in prediction of negative psychotherapy outcome. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 13, 202–214.