Testing Rival Measurement Models of the Personal Report of Communication Apprehension in Two Taiwanese Samples

Abstract

Some previous research has questioned the appropriateness of using McCroskey's Personal Report of Communication Apprehension with participants of non-Western countries. Rival measurement models of the scale were examined on two samples of 216 and 177 college students in Taiwan. Confirmatory factor analysis of the data showed that although a four-factor model was more representative of the data than the models with one, two, or three factors, this model did not generate an acceptable fit to the data. Further testing of discriminant validity suggested that Taiwanese college students do not differentiate a meeting setting from group, dyadic, and public speaking settings. Findings of this study suggest a re-examination of the conceptualization of communication apprehension before evaluating the relative importance of biological and environmental causes.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

J. C.

, & Gerbing

D. W.

(1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.

Beatty

M. J.

, & McCroskey

J. C.

(2000) Theory, scientific evidence, and the communibiological paradigm: reflections on misguided criticism. Communication Education, 49, 36–44.

Beatty

M. J.

McCroskey

J. C.

, & Heisel

A. D.

(1998) Communication apprehension as temperamental expression: a communibiological paradigm. Communication Monographs, 65, 197–219.

Bentler

P. M.

(1990) Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.

Bentler

P. M.

(2003) EQS for Windows (Version 6.1). Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.

Bollen

K. A.

(1989) Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.

Burroughs

N. F.

(2008) Raising the question #10 non-native speakers of English: what more can we do? Communication Education, 57, 289–295.

Buss

A. H.

(1980) Self-consciousness and social anxiety. San Francisco: Freeman.

Campbell

D. T.

, & Fiske

D. W.

(1959) Convergent and discriminant validity by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.

10.

Condit

C. M.

(2000) Culture and biology in human communication: toward a multi-causal model. Communication Education, 49, 7–24.

11.

Cronbach

L. J.

(1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.

12.

Cudeck

(1989) The analysis of correlation matrices using covariance structure models. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 317–327.

13.

Finn

A. N.

Sawyer

C. R.

, & Schrodt

(2009) Examining the effect of exposure therapy on public speaking state anxiety. Communication Education, 58, 92–109.

14.

Fornell

, & Larcker

D. F.

(1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.

15.

Hsu

C-F.

(2004) Sources of differences in communication apprehension between Chinese in Taiwan and Americans. Communication Quarterly, 52, 370–389.

16.

Hsu

C-F.

(2007) A cross-cultural comparison of communication orientations between Americans and Taiwanese. Communication Quarterly, 55, 359–374.

17.

L-T.

, & Bentler

P. M.

(1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

18.

Leary

M. R.

(1991) Social anxiety, shyness, and related constructs. In Robinson

J. P.

Shaver

P. R.

, & Wrightsman

L. S.

(Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes. Vol. 1. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Pp. 161–194.

19.

Levine

T. R.

, & McCroskey

J. C.

(1990) Measuring trait communication apprehension: a test of rival measurement models of the PRCA–24. Communication Monographs, 57, 62–72.

20.

Marsh

H. W.

, & Hocevar

(1985) Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: first and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 562–582.

21.

McCroskey

J. C.

(1977) Oral communication apprehension: a summary of recent theory and research. Human Communication Research, 4, 78–96.

22.

McCroskey

J. C.

(1982) An introduction to rhetorical communication. (4th ed.) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

23.

McCroskey

J. C.

(1984) The communication apprehension perspective. In Daly

J. A.

& McCroskey

J. C.

(Eds.), Avoiding communication: shyness, reticence, and communication apprehension. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Pp. 13–38.

24.

McCroskey

J. C.

(1997a) Self-report measurement. In Daly

J. A.

McCroskey

J. C.

Ayres

Hopf

, & Ayres

D. M.

(Eds.), Avoiding communication: shyness, reticence, and communication apprehension. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Pp. 191–216.

25.

McCroskey

J. C.

(1997b) Willingness to communicate, communication apprehension, and self-perceived communication competence: conceptualizations and perspectives. In Daly

J. A.

McCroskey

J. C.

Ayres

Hopf

, & Ayres

D. M.

(Eds.), Avoiding communication: shyness, reticence, and communication apprehension. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Pp. 75–108.

26.

McCroskey

J. C.

, & Beatty

M. J.

(1984) Communication apprehension and accumulated communication state anxiety experiences: a research note. Communication Monographs, 51, 79–84.

27.

McCroskey

J. C.

Beatty

M. J.

Kearney

, & Plax

T. G.

(1985) The content validity of the PRCA–24 as a measure of communication apprehension across communication contexts. Communication Quarterly, 33, 165–173.

28.

Merkin

R. S.

(2009) Cross-cultural communication patterns: Korean and American communication. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 20. Retrieved at http://www.immi.se/intercultural.

29.

Netemeyer

R. G.

Johnston

M. W.

, & Burton

(1990) Analysis of role conflict and role ambiguity in a structural equation framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 148–157.

30.

Pribyl

C. B.

Keaten

J. A.

Sakamoto

, & Koshikawa

(1998) Assessing the cross-cultural content validity of the Personal Report of Communication Apprehension scale (PRCA–24). Japanese Psychological Research, 40, 47–53.

31.

Pryor

Butler

, & Boehringer

(2005) Communication apprehension and cultural context: a comparison of communication apprehension in Japanese and American students. North American Journal of Psychology, 7, 247–252.

32.

Richmond

V. P.

, & McCroskey

J. C.

(1998) Communication apprehension, avoidance, and effectiveness. (5th ed.) Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

33.

Steiger

J. H.

(1990) Structural model evaluation and modification: an interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180.

34.

Steiger

J. H.

Shapiro

, & Browne

M. W.

(1985) On the multivariate asymptotic distribution of sequential chi-square statistics. Psychometrika, 50, 253–264.

35.

Wheaton

(1987) Assessment of fit of overidentified models with latent variables. Sociological Methods and Research, 16, 118–154.

36.

Wrench

J. S.

Brogan

S. M.

McCroskey

J. C.

, & Jowi

(2008) Social communication apprehension: the intersection of communication apprehension and social phobia. Human Communication, 11, 409–430.

37.

C-O.

(1994) Communication apprehension, anxiety, and achievement: a study of university students of English in Taiwan. Unpublished master's thesis, The Univer. of Texas at Austin.

38.

Zhang

(2005) Teacher immediacy and classroom communication apprehension: a cross-cultural investigation. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 34, 50–64.