Workgroup diversity can be conceptualized as variety, separation, or disparity. Thus, the proper operationalization of diversity depends on how a diversity dimension has been defined. Analytically, the minimal diversity must be obtained when there are no differences on an attribute among the members of a group, however maximal diversity has a different shape for each conceptualization of diversity. Previous work on diversity indexes indicated maximum values for variety (e.g., Blau's index and Teachman's index), separation (e.g., standard deviation and mean Euclidean distance), and disparity (e.g., coefficient of variation and the Gird coefficient of concentration), although these maximum values are not valid for all group characteristics (i.e., group size and group size parity) and attribute scales (i.e., number of categories). We demonstrate analytically appropriate upper boundaries for conditional diversity determined by some specific group characteristics, avoiding the bias related to absolute diversity. This will allow applied researchers to make better interpretations regarding the relationship between group diversity and group outcomes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgrestiA.AgrestiB. F. (1978) Statistical analysis of qualitative variation. Sociological Methodology, 9, 204–237.
2.
AllisonP. D. (1978) Measures of inequality. American Sociological Review, 43, 865–880.
3.
AndrésA.SalafrancaL.SolanasA. (2011) Predicting team output using indices at group level. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14, 393–498.
4.
AtkinsonA. B. (1970) On the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 244–263.
5.
AustinJ. R. (2003) Transactive memory in organizational groups: the effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 866–878.
6.
BarrickM. R.StewartG. L.NeubertM. J.MountM. K. (1998) Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 377–391.
7.
BarsadeS.WardA.TurnerJ.SonnenfeldJ. (2000) To your heart's content: a model of affective diversity in top management teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 802–836.
8.
BedeianA. G.MossholderK. W. (2000) On the use of the coefficient of variation as a measure of diversity. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 285–297.
9.
BellS. T. (2007) Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 595–615.
10.
BellS. T.VilladoA. J.LukasikM. A.BelauL.BriggsA. L. (2011) Getting specific about demographic diversity variables and team performance relationships: a meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 37, 709–743.
11.
BenbasatI.WeberR. (1996) Research commentary: rethinking “diversity” in information systems research. Information Systems Research, 7, 389–399.
12.
BetzN. E.FitzgeraldL. F. (1993) Individuality and diversity: theory and research in counseling psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 343–381.
13.
BiemannT.KearneyE. (2010) Size does matter: how varying group sizes in a sample affect the most common measures of group diversity. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 582–599.
14.
BlauP. M. (1977) Inequality and heterogeneity. New York: Free Press.
15.
BudescuD. V.BudescuM. (2012) How to measure diversity when you must. Psychological Methods, 17, 215–227.
16.
ByrneD. E. (1971) The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
17.
CarpenterM. (2002) The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 275–284.
18.
ChampernowneD. (1974) A comparison of measures of inequality of income distribution. The Economic Journal, 84, 787–816.
19.
ChanD. (1998) Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: a typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234–246.
20.
ConwayL. G.IIISchallerM. (1998) Methods for the measurement of consensual beliefs within groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2, 241–252.
21.
CowellF. A. (1995) Measuring inequality. (2nd ed.) London: Prentice Hall.
22.
DansereauF.AluttoJ. A.YammarinoF. J. (1984) Theory testing in organizational behavior: the variant approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
23.
DeRueD. S.HollenbeckJ.IlgenD.FeltzD. (2010) Efficacy dispersion in teams: moving beyond agreement and aggregation. Personnel Psychology, 63, 1–40.
24.
DissartJ. C. (2003) Regional economic diversity and regional economic stability: research results and agenda. International Regional Science Review, 26, 423–446.
25.
EdmonsonA. C.RoloffK. S. (2009) Overcoming barriers to collaboration: psychological safety and learning in diverse teams. In SalasE.GoodwinG. F.BurkeC. S. (Eds.), Team effectiveness in complex organizations. Cross-disciplinary perspectives and approaches. New York: Routledge. Pp. 183–208.
26.
ElyR. J.ThomasD. A. (2001) Cultural diversity at work: the effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 229–273.
27.
GastwirthJ. L. (1972) The estimation of the Lorenz curve and Gird index. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 54, 306–316.
28.
GibbsJ. P.MartinW. T. (1962) Urbanization, technology, and the division of labor: internatinal patterns. American Sociological Review, 27, 667–677.
29.
GoodwinG. F.BurkeC. S.WildmanJ. L.SalasE. (2009) Team effectiveness in complex organizations: an overview. In SalasE.GoodwinG. F.BurkeC. S. (Eds.), Team effectiveness in complex organizations: cross-disciplinary perspectives and approaches. New York: Routledge. Pp. 3–16.
30.
GruskyD. B. (1994) The contours of social stratification. In GruskyD. B. (Ed.), Social stratification: class, race, and gender in sociological perspective. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Pp. 3–35.
31.
HalfhillT. R.NielsenT. M.SundstromE. (2008) The ASA framework: a field study of group personality composition and group performance in military action teams. Small Group Research, 39, 616–635.
32.
HambrickD. C.ChoT. S.ChenM. E. (1996) The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms' competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 659–684.
33.
HarrisonD. A.KleinK. J. (2007) What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1199–1228.
34.
HarrisonD. A.SinH. P. (2006) What is diversity and how should it be measured? In KonradA. M.PrasadP.PringleJ. K. (Eds.), Handbook of workplace diversity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Pp. 191–216.
35.
HirschmanA. O. (1964) The paternity of an index. American Economic Review, 54, 761–762.
36.
HorwitzS. K.HorwitzI. B. (2007) The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: a meta-analytic review of team demography. Journal of Management, 33, 987–1015.
37.
JacksonS. E.JoshiA.ErhardtN. L. (2003) Recent research on team and organisational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management, 29, 801–830.
38.
JamsI. L. (1972) Victims of groupthink. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
39.
JehnK. A.NorthcraftG. B.NealeM. A. (1999) Why differences make a difference: a field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741–763.
40.
KozlowskiS. W. J.HattrupK. (1992) A disagreement about within-group agreement: disentangling issues of consistency versus consensus. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 161–167.
41.
KozlowskiS. W. J.KleinK. J. (2000) A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: contextual, temporal and emergent processes. In KleinK. J.KozlowskiS. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: foundations, extensions, and new directions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Pp. 3–90.
42.
KriegerA. M. (1979) Bounding moments, the Gird index and Lorenz curve from grouped data for unimodal density functions. American Statistical Association, 74, 375–378.
43.
LeleS. (1993) Euclidean distance matrix analysis of landmark data: estimation of mean form and mean form difference. Mathematical Geology, 25, 573–602.
44.
LiebersonS. (1969) Measuring population diversity. American Sociological Review, 34, 850–862.
45.
LockeK. D.HorowitzL. M. (1990) Satisfaction in interpersonal interactions as a function of similarity in level of dysphoria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 823–831.
46.
MartinJ. D.GrayL. N. (1971) Measurement of relative variation: sociological examples. American Sociological Review, 36, 496–502.
47.
McDonaldD. G.DimmickJ. (2003) The conceptualization and measurement of diversity. Communication Research, 30, 60–79.
48.
MinerA. S.HaunschildP. R.SchwabA. (2003) Experience and convergence: curiosities and speculation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12, 789–813.
49.
PelledL. H. (1996) Demographic diversity, conflict and work group outcomes: an intervening process theory. Organization Science, 7, 615–631.
50.
PelledL. H.EisenhardtK. M.XinK. R. (1999) Exploring the black box: an analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1–28.
51.
PhillipsD. J.ZuckermanE. W. (2001) Middle-status conformity: theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. The American Journal of Sociology, 107, 379–429.
52.
RayJ. L.SingerJ. D. (1973) Measuring the concentration of power in the international system. Sociological Methods and Research, 1, 403–437.
53.
RobersonQ. M.SturmanM. C.SimonsT. L. (2007) Does the measure of dispersion matter in multilevel research? A comparison of the relative performance of dispersion indexes. Organizational Research Methods, 10, 564–588.
54.
RushtonM. (2008) A note on the use and misuse of the racial diversity index. The Policy Studies Journal, 38, 445–459.
55.
ShawJ. B. (2004) The development and analysis of a measure of group faultlines. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 66–100.
StewartM. M.JohnsonO. E. (2009) Leader-member exchange as a moderator of the relationship between work group diversity and team performance. Group & Organization Management, 34, 507–535.
58.
StuartA.OrdJ. K. (1994) Kendall's advanced theory of statistics: Volume 1. Distribution theory. (6th ed.) New York: Edward Arnold.
59.
TeachmanJ. D. (1980) Analysis of population diversity: measures of qualitative variation. Sociological Methods and Research, 8, 341–362.
60.
TettR. P.BurnettD.D. (2003) A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 500–517.
61.
ThomasD. A. (1999) Beyond the simple demography-power hypothesis: how blacks in power influence white-mentor-black protégé developmental relationships. In MurrellA. J.CrosbyF. J.ElyR. J. (Eds.), Developmental relationships within multicultural organizations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Pp. 157–170.
62.
TsuiA. S.GuterB. A. (1999) Demographic differences in organizations: current research and future directions. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
63.
WilliamsK. Y.O'ReillyC. A. (1998) Demography and diversity in organisations: a review of 40 years of research. In StawB. M.CummingsL. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behaviour. Vol. 20. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Pp. 77–140.
