This study examined the discriminant and criterion-related validity of the Relative Deprivation Scale. The data were collected from 151 Korean employees who had recently experienced a merger and acquisition. The results of confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the two dimensions of relative deprivation (egoistic and fraternal relative deprivation) are clearly distinguishable from other conceptually related variables, such as negative affectivity, resistance to change, overall job dissatisfaction, and distributive justice. In addition, egoistic relative deprivation made a unique incremental contribution to explaining employee turnover intention beyond the contribution of conceptually related variables, while fraternal relative deprivation did not.
AndersonJ. C.GerbingD. W. (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.
3.
AshforthB.MaelF. (1989) Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39.
4.
ColquittJ. A. (2001) On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400.
5.
CrosbyF. (1976) A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83, 85–113.
6.
FeldmanD. C.LeanaC. R.BolinoM. C. (2002) Underemployment and relative deprivation among re-employed executives. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 453–471.
7.
FelpsW.MitchellT.HermanD.LeeT.HoltomB.HarmanW. (2009) Turnover contagion: how coworkers' job embeddedness and job search behaviors influence quitting. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 545–561.
8.
FornellC. D.LarckerF. (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement errors. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.
9.
FosterM.MatheonK. (1995) Double relative deprivation: combining the personal and political. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1167–1177.
10.
FriedY.TiegsR.NaughtonT.AshfordB. (1996) Managers' reactions to corporate acquisition: a test of an integrative model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 401–427.
11.
GaskiJ. F.RayN. N. (2001) Measurement and modeling of alienation in the distribution channel. Industrial Marketing Management, 30, 207–225.
12.
GriffethR. W.HomP. W.GaertnerS. (2000) A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26, 463–488.
13.
HittM. A.BiermanL.ShimizuK.KochharR. (2001) Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 13–28.
14.
HulinC. L. (1987) A psychometric theory of evaluation of item and scale translations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 115–142.
15.
KonovskyM. A.CropanzanoR. (1991) Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 698–707.
16.
LeeD.KimK.KimT.KwonS.ChoB. (2013) How and when do organizational integration efforts matter in South Korea? A psychological process perspective on the post-merger integration process. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 944–965.
17.
LepakD. P.LiaoH.ChungY.HardenE. E. (2006) A conceptual review of human resource management systems in strategic human resource management research. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 25, 217–271.
18.
LubatkinM.SchweigerD.WeberY. (1999) Top management turnover M on related M&As: an additional test of the theory of relative standing. Journal of Management, 25, 55–73.
19.
OregS. (2003) Resistance to change: developing an individual differences measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 680–693.
20.
PettigrewT. F. (2002) Summing up: relative deprivation as a key social psychological concept. In WalkerI.SmithH. (Eds.), Relative deprivation: specification, development, and integration.New York: Cambridge Univer. Press. Pp. 351–374.
21.
RousseauD. M.TijoriwalaS. A. (1999) What's a good reason to change? Motivated reasoning and social accounts in promoting organizational change. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 514–528.
22.
RuncimanW. (1966) Relative deprivation and social justice: a study of attitudes to social inequality in twentieth-century England.Berkeley, CA: Univer. of California Press.
23.
SmithH. J.OrtizD. J. (2002) Is it just me? The different consequences of personal and group relative deprivation. In WalkerI.SmithH. (Eds.), Relative deprivation: specification, development, and integration.New York: Cambridge Univer. Press. Pp. 91–115.
24.
TorkelsonE.MuhonenT. (2003) Coping strategies and health symptoms among women and men in a downsizing organization. Psychological Reports, 92, 899–907.
25.
TroppL.WrightS. (1999) Ingroup identification and relative deprivation: an examination across multiple social comparisons. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 707–724.
26.
TylerT. R.BoeckmannR. J.SmithH. J.HuoY. (1997) Social justice in a diverse society.Denver, CO: Westview.
27.
WalkerI.PettigrewT. F. (1984) Relative deprivation theory: an overview and conceptual critique. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 301–310.
28.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
29.
ZhouJ.GeorgeJ. M. (2001) When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 682–696.
