Two studies are reported that investigate the applicability of prospect theory to college students' academic decision making. Exp. 1 failed to provide support for the risk-seeking portion of the fourfold pattern predicted by prospect theory but did find the greater weighting of losses over gains. Using a more sensitive dependent measure, in Exp. 2 the results of the first experiment were replicated in terms of the gain-loss effect and also found some support for the fourfold pattern in the interaction between probabilities and gain versus loss. The greatest risk-seeking was found in the high probability loss condition.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AjzenI., & FishbeinM. (1977) Attitude-behavior relations: a theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888–918.
2.
BrandstätterE.GigerenzerG., & HertwigR. (2006) The priority heuristic: making choices without trade-offs. Psychological Review, 113, 409–432.
3.
BusemeyerJ. R., & TownsendJ. T. (1993) Decision field theory: a dynamic–cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychological Review, 100, 432–459.
4.
EpsteinS. (1983) Aggregation and beyond: some basic issues on the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality, 51, 360–392.
5.
HarrisR. J. (1994) ANOVA: an analysis of variance primer.Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.
6.
KahnemanD., & TverskyA. (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.
7.
KühbergerA. (1998) The influence of framing on risky decisions: a meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75, 23–55.
8.
MauleJ., & VillejoubertG. (2007) What lies beneath: reframing framing effects. Thinking and Reasoning, 13, 25–44.
9.
MaxwellS. E., & DelaneyH. D. (2004) Designing experiments and analyzing data: a model comparison perspective. (2nd ed.) Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
MellersB. A. (2000) Choice and the relative pleasure of consequences. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 910–924.
11.
RushtonJ. P.BrainerdC. J., & PressleyM. (1983) Behavioral development and construct validity: the principle of aggregation. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 18–38.
12.
TverskyA., & KahnemanD. (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.
13.
TverskyA., & KahnemanD. (1992) Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297–323.
