Forensic anthropologists have made remarkable contributions to the medicolegal investigation of nonaccidental injury in pediatric cases. They have created standard nomenclature for fracture descriptions. Anthropologists have developed novel techniques that increase the sensitivity of the pediatric autopsy. They have performed biomechanical research that enables reconstruction of events surrounding death. Also, anthropology practitioners have developed several reference guides on the subject of nonaccidental injury that are of value to forensic pathologists. These advancements assist forensic pathologists in the accurate classification of cause and manner of death in pediatric cases.
KleinmanP.K.Diagnostic imaging of child abuse.St. Louis: Mosby; c1998. Chapter 1, Skeletal trauma: general considerations; p. 8–25.
3.
LoveJ.C., WiersemaJ.M., DerrickS.M., Haden-PinneriK.The value of the pediatric skeletal examination in the autopsy of children. Acad Forensic Pathol.2014 Mar; 4(1): 100–8.
4.
PetersonJ.E., LoveJ.C., PintoD.C.A novel method for removing a spinal cord with attached cervical ganglia from a pediatric decedent. J Forensic Sci.2016 Jan; 61(1): 241–4. PMID: 26296423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12925.
5.
Upshaw DownsJ.C., AlexanderR.Abusive head trauma in infants and children: a medical, legal and forensic reference.St. Louis: STM Learning Inc.; c2006. Chapter 24, Untrue defenses; p. 421–40.
6.
MatshesE.W., EvansR.M., PinckardJ.K.Shaken infants die of neck truma, not of brain trauma. Acad Forensic Pathol.2011 Jul; 1(1): 82–91.
7.
BeynonM.E., Soto MartinezM.E., PetersonJ.E.Nerve root and dorsal root ganglia (NR/DRG) hemorrhage as an indicator of pediatric traumatic head injury (THI). In: Proceedings of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences; 2016 Feb 22-27; Las Vegas, NV. Colorado Springs: American Academy of Forensic Sciences; c2016. p. 733.
8.
CarterK.W., MoultonS.L.Pediatric abdominal injury patterns caused by “falls”: A comparison between nonaccidental and accidental trauma. J Pediatr Surg.2016 Feb; 51(2): 326–8. PMID: 26850907. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.10.056.
9.
KleinmanP.K., MarksS.C.Jr.. A regional approach to the classic metaphyseal lesion in abused infants: the proximal tibia. AJR Am J Roentgenol.1996 Feb; 166(2): 421–6. PMID: 8553960. http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.166.2.8553960.
10.
ThompsonA., BertocciG., KaczorK.Biomechanical investigation of the classic metaphyseal lesion using an immature porcine model. AJR Am J Roentgenol.2015 May; 204(5): W503–9. PMID: 25905956. http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.13267.
11.
BaumerT.G., PassalacquaN.V., PowellB.J.Age-dependent fracture characteristics of rigid and compliant surface impacts on the infant skull–a porcine model. J Forensic Sci.2010 Jul; 55(4): 993–7. PMID: 20384917. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01391.x.
12.
PowellB.J., PassalacquaN.V., BaumerT.G.Fracture patterns on the infant porcine skull following severe blunt impact. J Forensic Sci.2012 Mar; 57(2): 312–7. PMID: 22103781. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01969.x.
13.
PowellB.J., PassalacquaN.V., FentonT.W., HautR.C.Fracture characteristics of entrapped head impacts versus controlled head drops in infant porcine specimens. J Forensic Sci.2013 May; 58(3): 678–83. PMID: 23488572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12094.
14.
WiersemaJ.M., LoveJ.C., DerrickS.M.Standardized descriptive method for the anthropological evaluation of pediatric skull fractures. J Forensic Sci.2014 Nov; 59(6): 1487–92. PMID: 25041026. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12532.
15.
KleinmanP.K., SchlesingerA.E.Mechanical factors associated with posterior rib fractures: laboratory and case studies. Pediatr Radiol.1997 Jan; 27(1): 87–91. PMID: 8995179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002470050073.
16.
LoveJ.C., DerrickS.M., WiersemaJ.M.Novel classification system of rib fractures observed in infants. J Forensic Sci.2013 Mar; 58(2): 330–5. PMID: 23406328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12054.
17.
PintoD.C., LoveJ.C., DerrickS.M.A proposed scheme for classifying pediatric rib head fractures using case examples. J Forensic Sci.2015 Jan; 60(1): 112–7. PMID: 25388901. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12590.
18.
LoveJ.C., DerrickS.M., WiersemaJ.M.Skeletal atlas of child abuse.New York: Humana Press; 2011. 119 p.
19.
CohenH., KugelC., MayH.The impact velocity and bone fracture pattern: forensic perspective. Forensic Sci Int.2016 May 7; 266: 54–62. PMID: 27220089. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.04.035.
20.
O'ConnorJ.F., CohenJ.Diagnostic imaging of child abuse.St. Louis: Mosby; c1998. Chapter 7, Dating fractures; p. 168–177.
21.
LoveJ.C.Broken bones: anthropological analysis of blunt force trauma.2nd ed.Charles C. Thomas; c2013. Section III C, Child abuse: postcranial fractures; p. 336–49.
22.
RossA.H., AbelS.M.The juvenile skeleton in forensic abuse investigations.New York City: Humana Press; 2011. 205 p.
23.
Soto MartinezM.E., LoveJ.C.Infant bone health: an evaluation of quantitative ultrasound. In: Proceedings of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences; 2016 Feb 22-27; Las Vegas, NV. Colorado Springs: American Academy of Forensic Sciences; c2016. p. 160
