Medicolegal death investigation laws throughout the United States are a hodgepodge. They reflect different systems and different evolutions and are generally incoherent and not up to date. A thoughtful review of existing statutes and a thoughtful analysis could produce model legislation that could be brought to the legislatures of all states and territories for consideration in whole or in part. This article discusses various issues and thoughts that should be deliberated during the formulation and crafting of such model legislation.
JentzenJ.M.Death investigation in America: coroners, medical examiners, and the pursuit of medical certainty.Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; c2009. Chapter 1, Good and lawful men; p. 9–30.
9.
ThorwaldJ.Century of the detective.New York: Harcourt; c1965. Chapter 2, Dead men tell tales: milestones of forensic medicine; p. 111–266.
10.
UbelakerDH, editor. The global practice of forensic medicine.Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2015. 400 p.
11.
CurranW.J.The medicolegal autopsy and medicolegal investigation. Bull N Y Acad Med.1971 Jul; 47(7): 766–75. PMID: 5283132. PMCID: PMC1749917.
12.
EckertW.G.Medicolegal investigation in New York City: history and activities 1918-1978. Am J Forensic Med Pathol.1983 Mar; 4(1): 33–54. PMID: 6340467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000433-198303000-00005.
13.
JentzenJ.M.Death investigation in America: coroners, medical examiners, and the pursuit of medical certainty.Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; c2009. Chapter 4, Creating an identity; p. 71–95.
14.
HirschornB.Richard Spencer Childs: the political reformer and his influence on the work of the American Judicature Society. Judicature.1990 Dec-Jan; 73(4): 184–91.
15.
JentzenJ.M.Death investigation in America: coroners, medical examiners, and the pursuit of medical certainty.Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; c2009. Chapter 3, A model law; p. 53–70.
16.
LeflarR.A.Drafting the Model Postmortem Examination Act. Am Bar Assoc J.1955 Mar; 41(3): 266–8.
17.
DayJ.W.The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws. University Fla Law Rev.1955; 8: 276–86.
ColbyW.A.The 1954 Uniform and Model Acts: a summary and analysis. Am Bar Assoc J.1955 Jan; 41(1): 39–41.
20.
HanzlickR.L.A synoptic review of the 1954 “model postmortem examinations act”. Acad Forensic Pathol.2014 Dec; 4(4): 451–4.
21.
FergusonG.W.It's time for the coroner's post-mortem. J Am Judicature Soc.1955; 39(2): 40–6.
22.
GrossE.M.The Model Postmortem Examinations Act in the State of Connecticut, 1969-1974. Leg Med Annu.1975: 51–66. PMID: 1221242.
23.
HanzlickR.L.Analyses of death investigation systems and forensic pathology: a brief historical account. Acad Forensic Pathol.2014 Dec; 4(4): 440–3.
24.
HanzlickR.L.The conversion of coroner systems to medical examiner systems in the United States: a lull in the action. Am J Forensic Med Pathol.2007 Dec; 28(4): 279–83. PMID: 18043011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/paf.0b013e31815b4d5a.
25.
HanzlickR., CombsD.Medical examiner and coroner systems: history and trends. JAMA.1998 Mar 18; 279(11): 870–4. PMID: 9516003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.279.11.870.
26.
Constitution Of Alabama 1901 [Internet].Montgomery: State of Alabama; c2015. Section 175, Clerks of circuit courts, courts of like jurisdiction and criminal courts, tax collectors, tax assessors, judges of inferior courts, coroners, justices of the peace, notaries public, constables and county and municipal officers; [cited 2015 Nov 1]. Available from: http://alisondb.legislature.state.al.us/alison/codeofalabama/constitution/1901/CA-245714.htm.
Constitution of the State of Idaho [Internet]:.Boise: State of Idaho; c2015. Article XVIII, Section 6, County organization; [cited 2015 Nov 1]. Available from: http://www.sos.idaho.gov/elect/stcon/articl18.htm.
30.
Constitution of the State of Illinois [Internet].Springfield: State of Illinois; c2015. Article VII, Section 4, Local government; [cited 2015 Nov 1]. Available from: http://www.ilga.gov/commission/lrb/con7.htm.
31.
School of Law - Bloomington [Internet].Bloomington: Indiana University Bloomington; c2015. Article 6, Section 2, County officers; [cited 2015 Nov 1]. Available from: http://www.law.indiana.edu/uslawdocs/inconst/art-6.html.
32.
Kentucky Legislature [Internet].Frankfort: Kentucky Legislative Research Commission; c2015. Kentucky Constitution Section 99; [cited 2015 Nov 1]. Available from: http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/legresou/constitu/099.htm.
Justia [Internet].Mountain View (CA): Justia; c2015. Mississippi Constitution, Article 5, Section 135, County officers; [cited 2015 Nov 1]. Available from: http://law.justia.com/constitution/mississippi.
35.
Montana Code Annotated 2015 [Internet].Helena: State of Montana; c2015. Constitution of Montana Article XI, Section 3, Forms of government; [cited 2015 Nov 1]. Available from: http://leg.mt.gov/bills/mca/CONSTITUTION/XI/3.htm.
36.
South Carolina Legislature [Internet].Columbia: South Carolina Legislative Services Agency; c2015. South Carolina Constitution unannotated, Article V, Section 24, Law enforcement officials, prosecutors and administrative officers; Attorney General. Available from: http://www.scstatehouse.gov/scconstitution/a05.php.
37.
West Virginia Legislature [Internet].Charleston: West Virginia Legislature; c2015. Constitution of West Virginia, Article IX, Section 9-2, Constables, coroners and overseers of the poor; [cited 2015 Nov 1]. Available from: http://www.legis.state.wv.us/wvcode/wv_con.cfm#articleIX.
38.
Wisconsin Constitution [Internet].Madison: Wisconsin State Legislature; c2015. Article VI, Section 4, County officers; election, terms, removal; vacancies; [cited 2015 Nov 1]; p. 9. Available from: http://legis.Wisconsin.gov/rsb/unannotated_wisconst.pdf.
39.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [Internet].Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; c2015. Coroner/medical examiner laws, by state; [cited 2015 Nov 1]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/phlp/publications/topic/coroner.html.
40.
HanzlickR.L.A perspective on medicolegal death investigation in the United States: 2013. Acad Forensic Pathol.2014 Mar; 4(1): 2–9.
41.
HickmanM.J., HughesK.A., StromK.J., Ropero-MillerJ.D.Medical examiners and coroners' offices, 2004. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report [Internet]. 2007 Jun [cited 2015 Nov 1]; NCJ 216756. Available from: http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/meco04.pdf.
42.
Death Investigation Systems and NAME, ABMDI, IACME representation in States [Internet]. [place unknown]: Scientific Working Group for Medicolegal Death Investigation; 2011 Mar 21 [cited 2015 Nov 1]. 3 p. Available from: http://swgmdi.org/images/iscomrpt1-systemsfinal.pdf.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [Internet].Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; c2015. Death investigation systems; [cited 2015 Nov 1]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/phlp/publications/coroner/death.html.
National Research Council. Strengthening forensic science in the United States: a path forward.Washington: National Academies Press; c2009. Chapter 9, Medical examiner and coroner systems: current and future needs; [cited 2015 Nov 1]; p. 241–68. Available from: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/228091.pdf.
48.
CollinsK.A.Charleston, South Carolina: reversion from a medical examiner/coroner dual system to a coroner system. Acad Forensic Pathol.2014 Mar; 4(1): 60–4.
49.
WestonJ.T.A modern medicolegal investigative system within the framework of a State Division of Health–experience in Utah. J Forensic Sci.1970 Oct; 15(4): 461–75. PMID: 5493582.
50.
LewmanL.V., GunsonK.Oregon state medical examiner: changing the umbrella from public health to state police. Acad Forensic Pathol.2014 Mar; 4(1): 80–4.
51.
National Research Council. Strengthening forensic science in the United States: a path forward.Washington: National Academies Press; c2009. Chapter 2, The forensic science community and the need for integrated governance; [cited 2015 Nov 1]; p. 55-83. Available from: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/228091.pdf.
52.
WadeeS.A.Forensic pathology–a different perspective: investigative medicolegal systems in the United States. Med Law.1994; 13(5-6): 519–30. PMID: 7845182.
53.
LuziS.A., MelinekJ., OliverW.R.Medical examiners' independence is vital for the health of the American legal system. Acad Forensic Pathol.2013 Mar; 3(1): 84–92.
O'HalloranR.L.California: home of the sheriff-coroner. Acad Forensic Pathol.2014 Mar; 4(1): 74–9.
57.
LukeJ.L.The Oklahoma medical examiner system: recommendations for the future. J Okla State Med Assoc.1971 May; 64(5): 195–201. PMID: 508805.
58.
HymaB.A., NelsonS.J.Florida's medicolegal death investigation system: a brief history of the Medical Examiners Commission. Acad Forensic Pathol.2014 Mar; 4(1): 46–53.
59.
deJongJ.L.Michigan: the consequences of legislative change and competition for death investigation turf in Michigan. Acad Forensic Pathol.2014 Mar; 4(1): 54–9.
60.
Guerra ThompsonS.Cops in lab coats: curbing wrongful convictions through independent forensic laboratories.Durham (NC): Carolina Academic Press; 2015. 312 p.
HanzlickR.L.The “value-added” forensic autopsy: public health, other uses, and relevance to forensic pathology's future. Acad Forensic Pathol.2015 Jun; 5(2): 177–85.
63.
OliverW.R.Moritz revisited: modern mistakes about how we think about forensic pathology. Acad Forensic Pathol.2015 Jun; 5(2): 186–200.
FowlerD.R., GoldfarbB.The right to due process in challenging a determination of cause and manner of death: giving the family the ability to contest a cause and manner of decision by a medical examiner in Maryland. Acad Forensic Pathol.2015 Sep; 5(3): 396–401.
National Association of Medical Examiners [Internet].Walnut Shade (MO): National Association of Medical Examiners; c2015. National Association of Medical Examiners position statement on the collection, retention, and disposition of biologic specimens by medicolegal investigative agencies; 2008 Nov [cited 2015 Nov 1]. Available from: https://netforum.avectra.com/public/temp/ClientImages/NAME/e77b65f8-a9f6-4ff6-952a-684865068669.pdf.
CollinsK.A.Beyond the autopsy: special procedures performed postmortem. Acad Forensic Pathol.2015 Jun; 5(2): 280–90.
76.
WeinbergM.A., WeednV.W., WeinbergS., FowlerD.Characteristics of medical examiner/coroner offices accredited by the National Association of Medical Examiners. J Forensic Sci.2013 Sep; 58(5): 1193–9. PMID: 23822817. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12165.
77.
Gill JR, National Association of Medical Examiners Ad Hoc State Medical Examiner Committee. State medical examiner systems, 2013: staffing, autopsies, strengths, limitations, and needs. Acad Forensic Pathol.2014 Mar; 4(1): 24–31.
78.
HanzlickR.L., BodenC. National Association of Medical Examiners Ad Hoc Data Committee. Perceived strengths, limitations, and needs of death investigation systems in states that lack a state medical examiner. Acad Forensic Pathol.2014 Mar; 4(1): 32–40.
79.
Regional medicolegal autopsy and death investigation centers: construction, staffing, and costs [Internet]. [place unknown]: Scientific Working Group for Medicolegal Death Investigation; 2013 [cited 2015 Nov 1]. 12 p. Available from: http://swgmdi.org/images/si6.facilityconstruction.published.9-17-13.pdf.
WeednV.W., HoldsworthM.T., BarronA.M.Legal and ethical considerations in forensic pathology research. Acad Forensic Pathol.2011 Nov; 1(3): 288–301.
82.
CordnerS., LeahyF.Ethics and research on bodies in the jurisdiction of coroners or medical examiners. Acad Forensic Pathol.2013 Sep; 3(3): 301–11.
83.
National Association of Medical Examiners [Internet].Walnut Shade (MO): National Association of Medical Examiners; c2015. National Association of Medical Examiners position statement on forensic pathologist courtroom testimony in out-of-jurisdiction legacy cases 2015 Oct [cited 2015 Nov 1] Available from: https://netforum.avectra.com/public/temp/ClientImages/NAME/9065536b-fb3d-435e-b987-d254ae91d3eb.pdf.
84.
ThomasL.C.Coroner duties that differ from typical medical examiner duties. Acad Forensic Pathol.2014 Mar; 4(1): 18–23.
