Abstract
Partial autopsies are performed for a variety of reasons. They are regarded as safer in higher risk cases involving blood-borne pathogens. They can be completed more quickly - the examination of the body takes less time. With less information gathered at the initial examination, the turnaround time can be shorter or much shorter. Fewer resources are needed to perform partial autopsies so they are less costly to perform. Partial autopsies may be reimbursed at a lower rate and be lower cost to the funding agency. On the other hand, partial autopsies, by definition, do not provide complete descriptions of the extent of disease and nature of any injuries. A time-honored aphorism is relevant: “Partial autopsies provide partial answers.” Will the partial answer be sufficient? Reviewing the literature regarding the accuracy of the most partial autopsy — the external examination with toxicology specimens obtained — can help determine if partial autopsies can provide adequate answers to meet local requirements.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
