In 1956, Alan Moritz published a landmark article entitled Classical Mistakes in Forensic Pathology. This article has been required reading for two generations of forensic pathologists, and the mistakes he described are just as important today as they were 60 years ago. However, new technologies and challenges have changed how forensic pathology is practiced, and there are even more changes to come. A revisitation of Moritz is presented, with an emphasis on how we think about what we do.
MoritzAlan Richards- the encyclopedia of Cleveland history [Internet].Cleveland: Case Western Reserve University; 1997 Jul 10 [cited 2015 Apr 20]. Available from: http://ech.case.edu/cgi/article.pl?id=MAR1.
JentzenJ.M.Death investigation in America: coroners, medical examiners, and the pursuit of medical certainty.Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 2010. 300 p.
4.
MoritzA.R.Classical mistakes in forensic pathology. Am J Clin Pathol.1956 Dec; 26(12): 1383–97. PMID: 13394547.
5.
MoritzA.R.Classical mistakes in forensic pathology: Alan R. Moritz (American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1956) Am J Forensic Med Pathol.1981 Dec; 2(4): 299–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000433-198112000-00003. PMID: 7041626.
6.
ScheckB.Human factors in forensic science: why cognitive bias can lead to flawed expert opinions and testimony, how its influence can be minimized, and what challenges testifying experts and judges can expect to face. Plenary Session presented at: American Academy of Forensic Sciences annual meeting; 2015 Feb 18; Orlando, FL.
7.
U.S. Department of Defense [Internet].Washington: U.S. Department of Defense; c2015. News Transcript: DoD News Briefing – Secretary Rumsfeld and Gen. Myers; 2002 Feb 12 [cited 2015 Apr 20]. Available from: http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=2636.
8.
Bible Gateway [Internet].Grand Rapids (MI): Zondervan; c2015. 1 Corinthians 13, verse 12. Paul of Tarsus. First letter to the Corinthians. Ephesus (Roman empire) in Holy Bible, King James Version; [cited 2015 May 1]. Available from: https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Corinthians+13&version=KJV.
NisbettR.E.MasudaT.Culture and point of view. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.2003 Sep 16; 100(19): 11163–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1934527100. PMID: 12960375. PMCID: PMC196945.
12.
XinY.BarnhartR.M.ChongzhengN.Three thousand years of Chinese paintings.New Haven (CT): Yale University Press; 2002. p. 282–5.
LittlewoodJ.E.A Mathematicians miscellany.Rochester (NY): Scholar's Choice; 2015. 148 p.
15.
DoyleA.C.The sign of the four.Seattle: Amazon Digital Services: 2014. 132 p.
16.
Goldbeck-WoodS.Evidence on peer review-scientific quality control or smokescreen?BMJ.1999 Jan 2; 318(7175): 44–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7175.44. PMID: 9872890. PMCID: PMC1114539.
StrasakA.M.ZamanQ.MarinellG.The use of statistics in medical research: a comparison of the New England Journal of Medicine and Nature Medicine. Am Statistician.2007 Feb; 61(1): 47–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1198/000313007X170242.
19.
BlackW.C.Computed tomography screening for lung cancer in the National Lung Screening Trial: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Thorac Imaging.2015 Mar; 30(2): 79–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000136. PMID: 25635704.
ShakespeareW.Othello.New York: Simon and Schuster; 1993. 314 p.
24.
TzuS.The art of war.Seattle: Amazon Digital Services; 2012. 72 p.
25.
DennettD.How to make mistakes In: BrockmanJ.MatsonK., editors. How things are: a science tool-kit for the mind.New York: William Morrow and Company; 1995. p. 137–44.
26.
BermanW.When will they ever learn? Learning and teaching from mistakes in the clinical context. Clin Law Rev.2006 Fall; 13(1): 115–36.
27.
ReasonJ.Human error.New York: Cambridge University Press: 1990. 320 p.
28.
OliverW.R.FangX.Forensic pathologist consensus in the interpretation of photographs of patterned injuries of the skin. J Forensic Sci. Forthcoming 2015.
