Abstract
The great majority of counties in California have elected sheriff-coroners conducting medicolegal death investigations. State law enabling such a combination of official duties, favorable administrative structures, available staffing, funding and training issues have supported the intra-state spread of this death investigation system. Criticism of death investigation systems lead by officers whose primary duty is policing have centered on the perception of a conflict of interest in deaths investigated criminally by the sheriff-coroner and in deaths in the custody of the sheriff-coroner. Though such deaths are intermittently publicized and questioned in the media, no objective data has been collected and reported to support or refute such concerns.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
