Because this issue of Academic Forensic Pathology is dedicated to firearms related topics, the author was invited to provide a perspective on manner of death classification in firearms-involved deaths. This article discusses cases which are routinely encountered, as well as a selected group of more rare and more controversial cases regarding manner of death classification. The experience, knowledge, personal philosophies, and even conscious or unconscious biases of individual certifiers of death vary and can have impact on manner of death certification. Further, in many cases, there is no right or wrong answer and there is plenty of room for disagreement and debate. For these reasons, and with a goal of national consistency in manner of death classification, the author recommends that the National Association of Medical Examiners implement a task force to make recommendations as to how manner of death should be classified in specific types of firearms-related deaths. To date, some guidelines have been published but they do not carry the weight of specific and official recommendations. There must always be room for certifier discretion, but such discretion could be used in the context of a set of formal recommendations as a baseline, so that variances can be explained and manner of death certifications cannot be viewed as arbitrary and/or capricious. This article includes the author's viewpoints concerning manner of death in selected cases.
National Center for Health Statistics. Medical examiners' and coroners handbook on death registration and fetal death reporting.2003 Revision [Internet]. Hyattsville (MD): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2003 Apr [cited 2013 Mar 23]. 130 p. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/misc/hb_me.pdf.
2.
OliverW.R.Inference in Forensic Pathology. Acad Forensic Pathol.2012 Mar; 2(1): 106.
MolinaD.K.RulonJ.J.WallaceE.I.The atypical entrance wound: differential diagnosis and discussion of an unusual case. Am J Forensic Med Pathol.2012 Sep; 33(3): 250–2.
6.
Di MaioV.J.M.Gunshot wounds: practical aspects of firearms, ballistics and forensic techniques.Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1993. 331 p.
RosenbergM.L.DavidsonL.E.SmithJ.C.Operational criteria for the determination of suicide. J Forensic Sci.1988 Nov; 33(6): 1445–56.
9.
Office of the Surgeon General (US); National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention (US). 2012National strategy for suicide prevention: Goals and objectives for action: A report of the U.S. Surgeon General and of the National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention.Washington (DC): US Department of Health & Human Services (US); 2012 Sep. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK109917/.
10.
PaoP.N.The syndrome of delicate self-cutting. Br J Med Psychol.1969 Aug; 42(3): 195–206.
11.
CrosbyA.OrtegaL.MelansonC.Self-directed violence surveillance: Uniform definitions and recommended data elements [Internet].Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2011 [cited 2013 Mar 23]. 96 p. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/Self-Directed-Violence-a.pdf.
HanzlickR.GoodinJ.Mind your manners. Part III: Individual scenario results and discussion of the National Association of Medical Examiners Manner of Death Questionnaire, 1995. Am J Forensic Med Pathol.1997 Sep; 18(3): 228–45.
14.
BotelloT.NoguchiT.SathyavagiswaranL.Evolution of the psychological autopsy: Fifty years of experience at the Los Angeles County Chief Medical Examiner-Coroner's Office. J Forensic Sci.2013 Mar 28. [Epub ahead of print].
15.
HanzlickR.L.EskewR.Suicide by three shots with different muzzle to target distances (Letter). Am J Forensic Med Pathol.1984 Mar; 5(1): 95.
16.
HudsonP.Multishot firearm suicide. Examination of 58 cases. Am J Forensic Med Pathol.1981 Sep; 2(3): 239–42.
17.
WilsonE.F.DavisJ.H.BloomJ.D.Homicide or suicide: the killing of suicidal persons by law enforcement officers. J Forensic Sci.1998 Jan; 43(1): 46–52.
18.
NeitzelA.R.GillJ.R.Death certification of “suicide by cop.”J Forensic Sci.2011 Nov; 56(6): 1657–60.
19.
National Institute of Justice. Study of deaths following electro muscular disruption [Internet].Washington: U.S. Department of Justice; May 2011 [cited 2013 Apr 28]. 60 p. Available from: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/233432.pdf.
OliverW.R.Intent in manner determination. Acad Forensic Pathol.2012 Jun; 2(2): 126–37.
22.
HanzlickR., editor. Cause of death and the death certificate: Important information for physicians, coroners, medical examiners, and the public.Northfield (IL): College of American Pathologists; c2006. 244 p.
23.
HanzlickR.Lawsuits against medical examiners or coroners arising from death certificates. Am J Forensic Med Pathol.1997 Jun; 18(2): 119–23.
24.
LuziS.A.MelinekJ.OliverW.R.Medical examiners' independence is vital for the health of the American legal system. Acad Forensic Pathol.2013 Mar; 3(1): 84–92.
