The production of good quality research is now one of the expectations for those working in forensic science and forensic pathology. Although potentially daunting, this necessary and important goal can be realized with the appropriate selection and utilization of statistical tools in the analysis of research projects in the forensic sciences. As detailed textbooks on statistics are available, this article provides an overview of how to organize data commonly seen in forensic pathology and which statistical procedures should be performed.
SackettD.L., RosenbergW.M.C., GrayJ.A.M.. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't.BMJ.1996 Jan 13; 312(7023): 71–2.
2.
National Criminal Justice Reference Service [Internet].Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice; c1999. Forensic Sciences: Review of Status and Needs, 1999; 2011 Oct 14 [cited 2011 Oct 15]. Available from: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/173412.pdf
3.
The Honourable Stephen T.Goudge commissioner. Inquiry into pediatric forensic pathology in Ontario.Toronto: Gov't. of Ontario, Ministry of the Attorney General; c2008. Report. 94p.
4.
BailarJ.C., HoaglinD.C.. Medical Uses of Statistics.3rd ed.Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons; c2009. 491 p.
5.
KramerM.S.. Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics. A primer for clinical investigators and decision-makers.1 ed.Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1988. 286 p.
6.
LilienfeldD.E., StolleyP.D.. Foundations of Epidemiology.3rd ed.New York: Oxford University Press; 1994. 371 p.
7.
KelseyJL., WhittemoreAS., EvansAS., ThompsonW.D.. Methods in Observational Epidemiology.2nd ed.New York: Oxford University Press; 1996. 448 p.
BurkeA.P., FarbA., MalcomG.T.. Coronary risk factors and plaque morphology in men with coronary disease who died suddenly.N Engl J Med.1997 May 1; 336(18): 1276–82.
10.
OpeskinK., BerkovicS.F.., Risk factors for sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: a controlled prospective study based on coroners cases.Seizure.2003 Oct; 12(7): 456–64.
11.
PaganoM., GauvreauK.. Principles of biostatistics.2nd edition.Pacific Grove, California: Duxbury Press; 2000. 592 p.
12.
ParaiJ.L., KreigerN., TomlinsonG., AdlafE.M.. The validity of the certification of manner of death by Ontario Coroners.Ann Epidemiol.2006 Nov; 16(11): 805–11.
13.
HarrellF.E.Jr.. Missing Data. In: Regression Modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression and survival analysis.1st edition.New York: Springer-Verlay; 2001. 591 p.
14.
KuzonW.M.Jr., UrbanchekM.G., McCabeS.. The seven deadly sins of statistical analysis.Ann Plast Surg.1996 Sep; 37(3): 265–72.
15.
CampbellM.J., JuliousS.A., AltmanD.G.. Estimating sample sizes for binary, ordered categorical, and continuous outcomes in two group comparisons.BMJ.1995 Oct 28; 311(7013): 1145–8.
16.
EngJ.. Sample size estimation: how many individuals should be studied?Radiology.2003 May; 227(2): 309–13.
17.
GoreS.M., JonesG., ThompsonS.G.. The Lancet's statistical review process: areas for improvement by authors.Lancet.1992 Jul 11; 340(8811): 100–2.
18.
MoherD., DulbergC.S., WellsG.A.. Statistical power, sample size and their reporting in randomized controlled trials.JAMA.1994 Jul 13; 272(2): 122–4.
19.
StrasakA.M., ZamanQ., MarinellG., PfeifferKP, UlmerH.. The use of statistics in medical research: a comparison of the New England Journal of Medicine and Nature Medicine.Amer Statistician.2007 Feb 1; 61(1): 47–55.
20.
ChanA., HrobjartssonA., JorgensenK.J., GotzscheP.C., AltmanD.G.. Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomized trials: comparison of publications with protocols.BMJ.2008 Dec 4; 337: a2299.
