Photography has been a mainstay of autopsy documentation for many years. Recent advances in digital photography have increased its prominence. Good photographic practice requires an understanding of how a camera works, basic optics, and basic digital processes, as well as traditional compositional issues. The quality of autopsy photography is a function both of the skill of the photographer and how the imaging process fits into the autopsy workflow. Numerous technical issues affect image quality, including the type of sensor, the type of camera back, the lens, the aperture, the shutter speed, and lighting. The choice of output format and procedures for archival of images is important. A number of special processes may be part of autopsy pathology including epiluminescence, indirect ophthalmoscopy, and ultraviolet and infrared photography. Postprocessing of images is common, but must be documented.
Scientific Working Group on Imaging Technology.Field Photography Equipment and Supporting nfrastructur3. (Section 3), Version 3.0. Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation. 2009. 6 p.
KrissM.. Solid state imaging sensors. In: PerezMichael, editor. Focal Encyclopedia of Photography 4 ed.Maryland Heights(MO): Focal Press2007; p 370–371.
9.
Sugiyama, Toshinobu, inventor.“Image-capturing apparatus”, US patent application 20050231618, filed March 30, 2005
10.
D'LunaL.J., ParulskiK.A., MaslynD.C., HadleyM.A., KenneyT.J., HibbardR.H., GuidashR.M., LeeP.P.“A digital video signal post-processor for color image sensors”. In: Proceedings of the Custom Integrated Circuits Conference 1989 May 15- May 18 1989; San Diego (CA).Piscataway(NJ): IEEE Press; 1989. p. 24.2/1–24.2/4.
11.
BattiatoS., GuarneraM.I., MessinaG., TomaselliV.. Recent Patents on Color Demosaicing.Recent Patents on Computer Science2008; 1(3): 94–207.
12.
HubelP.M., LiuJ., GuttoschR.J.. Spatial Response of Color Image Sensors: Bayer Color Filters and Foveon X3. Tech. Rep. ID 6502, Foveon, San Antonio; 2002. 4p.
13.
Hideo Hoshuyama, inventor.Nikon Corporation, assignee. Color Separation Device of Solid State Image Sensor. US Patent 7,138,663 B2, 2006 Nov 21.
Kessler, In: Michael Perez, editor.Focal Encyclopedia of Photography4 ed.Maryland Heights(MO): Focal Press2007; p. 711–723.
16.
KelbyS.. The Digital Photography Book, vol 3. Berkeley(CA): Peachpit Press; 2010; p 73.
17.
KuwabaraG., On the Flare of Lenses,Journal of the Optical Society of America1953; 43: 53–57.
18.
RobinsonE.M.. Crime Scene Photography2 ed.Maryland Heights (MO): Academic Press. 2010; p. 125–208.
19.
RmSiewR.H., “f/No. and the radiometry of image forming optical systems with non-circular aperture stops,” in Optical Modeling and Performance Predictions II, KahanMark A., editor, Proceedings of SPIE 2005 Aug 3 2005; San Diego(CA). Bellingham(WA): SPIE 5867: 586701 2005.
20.
RaySidney F.. 2002. Applied photographic optics: lenses and optical systems for photography.3rd ed.Maryland Heights(MO): Focal Press; p. 126.
21.
KorenN.. Understanding image sharpness part 6: Depth of field and diffraction.[Internet].Boulder(CO): Norman Koren [cited 5/312/2011]. Avaliable from: http://www.normankoren.com/Tutorials/MTF6.html
SowerbyA.L.M.. (1961). Dictionary of Photography: A Reference Book for Amateur and Professional Photographers (19th ed.).London: Iliffe Books Ltd. pp. 582–589.
WyszeckiG., StilesW.S.. The CIE Colorimetric System. In Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Forumlae.2 ed.New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1982. 950 p.
30.
SmithT., GuildJ.. “The C.I.E. colorimetric standards and their use”.Transactions of the Optical Society1931-32; 33(3): 73–134.
31.
RoskaB., WerblinF.. Vertical interactions across ten parallel, stacked representations in the mammalian retina.Nature2001; 410: 583–587.
32.
HyzerW.G., KraussT.C.. The Bite Mark Standard Reference Scale–ABFO No. 2.J Forensic Sci1988 Mar; 33(2): 498–506.
Scientific Working Group on Imaging Technologies.Best Practices for Archiving Digital and Multimedia Evidence (DME) in the Criminal Justice SystemWashington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation20075 p.
39.
LawrenceR.D.. Inaccuracy of measuring wounds on autopsy photographs.Am J Forensic Med Pathol1985 Mar; 6(1): 17–8.
LantzP.E.. A simple model for teaching postmortem monocular indirect ophthalmoscopy.J Forensic Sci2009 May; 54(3): 676–7.
42.
FinkbeinerW., UrsellP.C., DavisR.L.. Autopsy Pathology: A Manual and Atlas.New York: Saunders2009 p. 84.
43.
SymesS.A., BerrymanmH.E., SmithO.C.. Saw Marks in Bone: Introduction and Examination of Residual Kerf Contour. In: Forensic Osteology II, Advances in the Identification of Human Remains.ReichsK.J., ed. 1998Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas. p. 333–352.
44.
GardnerC.D., MincerH., SmithO.C., SymesS.A.. Application of Epiluminescence Microscopy.Proceedings of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences1999; 5: 139–140.
45.
DorionR.. Bitemark Evidence: A Color Atlas and Text.2 ed.Boca Raton: CRC Press2011674 pp.
46.
HaglundW.D., SperryK.. The use of hydrogen peroxide to visualize tattoos obscured by decomposition and mummification.J Forensic Sci1993 Jan; 38(1): 147–50.
47.
OliverW.R., LeoneL.. Digital UV/IR Photography for Tattoo Evaluation in Mummified Remains.J Forens Sci Forthcoming 2011.
48.
Scientific Working Group on Imaging Technology.Best Practices for Documenting Image EnhancementWashington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation20106 p.
49.
NianiosG., MitrogiannisC., BaradakiV., PapaioannouG.. Accuracy assessment of a photoimaging and scanner-based wound diagnostics method. In: 9th International Conference on Information Technology and Applications in Biomedicine., ITAB 2009.2009 Nov 7- Nov 2. Lanarca, Cyprus. Piscataway(NJ): IEEE Press p. 1–4.
