There are considerable gaps in the knowledge of the global epidemiology of skin conditions in the geriatric population.
Objective:
This study attempted to (1) determine the frequency of skin conditions, (2) evaluate the agreement between two different data sources of information (self-report versus administrative), and (3) document medical care service use for skin conditions in a representative sample of community-dwelling older adults.
Methods:
A secondary analysis using data from a longitudinal population-based health survey conducted in Quebec (2005–2008) within a sample of 2,811 community-dwelling older adults.
Results:
Our results highlighted a high prevalence rate of self-reported (13%) and diagnosed skin conditions (21%). Agreement between data sources was low (kappa < 0.20). Most dermatologic-related medical visits were made to dermatologists (almost 60%).
Conclusion:
The epidemiology of skin conditions in the geriatric population is an underresearched field, despite its important prevalence and relevance as a source of information for assessing the health care needs of older adults.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BickersDRLimHWMargolisD. The burden of skin diseases: 2004. A joint project of the American Academy of Dermatology Association and the Society for Investigative Dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol2006;55:490–500, doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2006.05.048.
2.
SmithDRLeggatP. Prevalence of skin disease among the elderly in different clinical environments. Australas J Ageing2005;24:71–6, doi:10.1111/j.1741-6612.2005.00084.x.
3.
IngordoVGentileCIannazzoneSS. The ‘EpiEnlist’ project: a dermo-epidemiologic study on a representative sample of young Italian males. Prevalence of selected pigmentary lesions. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol2007;21:1091–6, doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2007.02205.x.
4.
LomholtG. Prevalence of skin diseases in a population: a census study from the Faroe Islands. Dan Med Bull1964;11:1–7.
5.
KrupinskiJBaikieAGStollerA. A community health survey of Heyfield, Victoria. Med J Aust1967;1:1204–11.
6.
JohnsonMLT. Skin conditions and related need for medical care among persons 1–74 years, United States, 1971–1974. Series 11, Data from the National Health Survey. No 212, DHEW Publication No. (PHS) 79–1660. Hyattsville (MD): U.S. DHEW, Public Health Service, National Center for Health Statistics, Vital and Health Statistics; 1978.
7.
ReaJNNewhouseMLHalilT. Skin disease in Lambeth. A community study of prevalence and use of medical care. Br J Prev Soc Med1976;30:107–14.
8.
BingeforsKLindbergMIsacsonD. Self-reported dermatological problems and use of prescribed topical drugs correlate with decreased quality of life: an epidemiological survey. Br J Dermatol2002;147:285–90, doi:10.1046/j.1365-2133.2002.04824.x.
9.
WolkensteinPGrobJJBastuji-GarinS. French people and skin diseases: results of a survey using a representative sample. Arch Dermatol2003;139:1614–9, doi:10.1001/archderm.139.12.1614.
10.
DalgardFSvenssonAHolmJø. Self-reported skin morbidity among adults: associations with quality of life and general health in a Norwegian survey. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc2004;9:120–5, doi:10.1046/j.1087-0024.2003.09111.x.
11.
St SauverJLWarnerDOYawnBP. Why patients visit their doctors: assessing the most prevalent conditions in a defined American population. Mayo Clin Proc2013;88:56–67, doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.08.020.
12.
TranHChenKLimAC. Assessing diagnostic skill in dermatology: a comparison between general practitioners and dermatologists. Australas J Dermatol2005;46:230–4, doi:10.1111/j.1440-0960.2005.00189.x.
13.
VerhoevenEWMKraaimaatFWVan WeelC. Skin diseases in family medicine: prevalence and health care use. Ann Fam Med2008;6:349–54, doi:10.1370/afm.861.
14.
KerrOATidmanMJWalkerJJ. The profile of dermatological problems in primary care. Clin Exp Dermatol2010;35:380–3, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2230.2009.03586.x.
15.
SchofieldJKFlemingDGrindlayD. Skin conditions are the commonest new reason people present to general practitioners in England and Wales. Br J Dermatol2011;165:1044–50, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10464.x.
16.
LowellBAFroelichCWFedermanDG. Dermatology in primary care: prevalence and patient disposition. J Am Acad Dermatol2001;45:250–5, doi:10.1067/mjd.2001.114598.
17.
FienSBermanBMagraneB. Skin disease in a primary care practice. Skinmed2005;4:350–3, doi:10.1111/j.1540-9740.2005.04267.x.
18.
ShahMCoatsM. An assessment of the quality of life in older patients with skin disease. Br J Dermatol2006;154:150–3, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06959.x.
19.
BlaySLAndreoliSBGastalFL. Prevalence of self-reported sleep disturbance among older adults and the association of disturbed sleep with service demand and medical conditions. Int Psychogeriatr2008;20:582–95, doi:10.1017/S1041610207006308.
20.
DrollerH. Dermatologic findings in a random sample of old persons. Geriatrics1955;10:421–4.
21.
CrumRMAnthonyJCBassettSS. Population-based norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination by age and educational level. JAMA1993;269:2386–91, doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03500180078038.
22.
FleischerABJrFeldmanSRWhiteRE. Procedures for skin diseases performed by physicians in 1993 and 1994: analysis of data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. J Am Acad Dermatol1997;37(5Pt 1):719–24, doi:10.1016/S0190-9622(97)70107-5.
23.
AwadallaFRosenbaumDACamachoF. Dermatologic disease in family medicine. Fam Med2008;40:507–11.
24.
CoxBGCohenSB. Methodological issues for health care surveys. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.; 1985.
25.
CourtemancheRTarteF. Sampling plan for the Quebec Health Survey, technical manual 87–02. Montreal: Ministry of Health and Social Services, Government of Quebec, Canada; 1987.
26.
TrudelGCourtemancheRTarteF. Validation, coding, entry and weighting of data for the Québec Health Survey, technical manual 87–07. Quebec (QC): Ministry of Health and Social Services, Government of Quebec, Canada; 1992.
27.
CohenJ. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas1960;20:37–46, doi:10.1177/001316446002000104.
28.
FaraoneSVTsuangMT. Measuring diagnostic accuracy in the absence of a “gold standard.”. Am J Psychiatry1994;151:650–7.
29.
EkströmJ. The phi-coefficient, the tetrachoric correlation coefficient, and the Pearson-Yule Debate. Department of Statistics, UCLA. Available at: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/9ch5f19s (accessed August 28, 2012).
30.
McNemarQ. Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika1947;12:153–7, doi:10.1007/BF02295996.
31.
GillDMerlinKPlunkettA. Population-based surveys on the frequency of common skin diseases in adults—is there a risk of response bias?. Clin Exp Dermatol2000;25:62–6, doi:10.1046/j.1365-2230.2000.00576.x.
32.
OckanderMHjerppeMTimpkaT. Patient-doctor concordance in elderly women’s self-reported health and medical records. Methods Inf Med2002;41:119–24.
33.
JagouMBastuji-GarinSBourdon-LanoyE. Poor agreement between self-reported and dermatologists’ diagnoses for five common dermatoses. Br J Dermatol2006;155:1006–12, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07402.x.
34.
Esteban-VasalloMDDomínguez-BerjónMFAstray-MochalesJ. Epidemiological usefulness of population-based electronic clinical records in primary care: estimation of the prevalence of chronic diseases. Fam Pract2009;26:445–54, doi:10.1093/fampra/cmp062.
35.
BeauregardSGilchrestBA. A survey of skin problems and skin care regimens in the elderly. Arch Dermatol1987;123:1638–43, doi:10.1001/archderm.1987.01660360066014.
SternRS. Dermatologists and office-based care of dermatologic disease in the 21st century. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc2004;9:126–30, doi:10.1046/j.1087-0024.2003.09108.x.
39.
KilkennyMStathakisVJolleyD. Maryborough Skin Health Survey: prevalence and sources of advice for skin conditions. Australas J Dermatol1998;39:233–7, doi:10.1111/j.1440-0960.1998.tb01479.x.
