Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

French

Background:

Although more than 25 acne grading systems exist, only 2 are inclusive of truncal acne. There is neither a gold standard nor a consistently used standardized system.

Purpose:

Our purpose was to develop and validate an acne grading system incorporating severity at the face, chest, and back.

Methods:

We developed a comprehensive acne severity scale (CASS) by modifying a preexisting facial acne scale, the Investigator Global Assessment, to include truncal acne. The validity and responsiveness of CASS grades were correlated with Leeds scores at baseline and after 6 months of standard acne treatment.

Results:

Spearman correlations were significant between Leeds and CASS grades for the face (0.823), chest (0.854), and back (0.872), respectively (p < .001). After 6 months of therapy, changes in these scores were also significantly correlated (p < .001) at all three sites.

Conclusion:

Concurrent validity of CASS is demonstrated by a very strong correlation with Leeds grading. CASS is simpler to use than the Leeds system and more appropriate for translation of research trial results to clinical practice.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Lehmann

Robinson

Andrews

. Acne therapy: A methodologic review. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002;47:231–40.

Stathakis

Kilkenny

Marks

. Descriptive epidemiology of acne vulgaris in the community. Australas J Dermatol 1997;38:115–23.

O'Brien

Lewis

Cunliffe

. The Leeds revised acne grading system. J Dermatolog Treat 1998;9:215–20.

Doshi

Zaheer

Stiller

. A comparison of current acne grading systems and proposal of a novel system. Int J Dermatol 1997;36:416–8.

Allen

Smith

Jr . Various parameters for grading acne vulgaris. Arch Dermatol 1982;118:23–5.

US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration (November 2002). Dermatologic and Ophthalmic Drugs Advisory Committee Briefing. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/02/briefing/3904B1_02_Executive%20Summary.htm (accessed July 1, 2004).

Witkowski

Parish

. The assessment of acne: An evaluation of grading and lesion counting in the measurement of acne. Clin Dermatol 2004;22:394–7.

Pochi

Shalita

Strauss

Webster

. Report of the consensus conference on acne classification. J Am Acad Dermatol 1991;24:495–500.

US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). Guidance for industry; acne vulgaris: developing drugs for treatment; September 2005; 1–14. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/Cder/guidance/6499dft.htm (accessed February 12, 2005).

10.

Lucky

Barber

Girman

. A multirater validation study to assess the reliability of acne lesion counting. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996;35:559–65.

11.

Tan

Fung

Bulger

. Reliability of dermatologists in acne lesion counts and global assessments. J Cutan Med Surg 2006;10:160–5.

12.

Tan