LewinDavidMitchellDaniel J.B., “Systems of Employee Voice: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives,”California Management Review, 34/3 (Spring 1992).
2.
This is a revised version of a paper originally presented in a Syposium on Employee Voice at the Forty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association, New Orleans, LA, January 1992.
3.
See, as examples, LawlerEdward E.III, High Involvement Management (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1986); SimmonsJohnMaresWilliam, Working Together: Employee Participation in Action (New York, NY: New York University Press, 1985).
4.
McGregorDouglas, The Human Side of Enterprise (New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1960).
5.
DruckerPeter, “The Emerging Theory of Manufacturing,”Harvard Business Review, 68 (May/June 1990): 94–102.
6.
IchniowskiCaseyLewinDavid, “Grievance Procedures and Firm Performance,” in KleinerMorris M.BlockRichard N.RoomkinMyronSalsburgSydney W., eds., Human Resources and the Performance of the Firm (Madison, WI: Industrial Relations Research Association, 1987), pp. 159–193.
7.
KleinerMorris M., “Employee Voice: An Economic Perspective,” paper presented to the Forty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association, New Orleans, LA, January 1992.
8.
McCabeDouglas M., Corporate Nonunion Complaint Procedures and Systems: A Strategic Human Resource Management Analysis (New York, NY: Praeger, 1988).
9.
LewinDavid, “Grievance Procedures in Nonunion Workplaces: An Empirical Analysis of Usage, Dynamics, and Outcomes,”Chicago-Kent Law Review, 68/1 (1992a, forthcoming).
10.
DelaneyJohn T.LewinDavidIchniowskiCasey, Human Resource Management Policies and Practices of American Firms, BLMR No. 137 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor-Management Relations and Cooperative Programs, 1989).
11.
HavlovicStephen J., “Quality of Work Life and Human Resource Outcomes,”Industrial Relations, 30 (Fall 1991): 23–37; LawlerEdward E.IIIMohrmanSusan A., “High-Involvement Management,”Personnel, 66 (April 1989): 25–34; WaltonRichard E., “From Control to Commitment in the Workplace,”Harvard Business Review, 64 (March/April 1985): 77–84.
12.
BainTrevor, “Employee Voice: A Comparative International Perspective,” paper presented to the Forty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association, New Orleans, LA, January 1992.
JacobySanford M., Employing Bureaucracy: Managers, Unions, and the Transformation of Work in American Industry, 1900–1945 (New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1985).
16.
RoweMary P., “People Who Feel Harassed Need a Complaint System with Both Formal and Informal Options,”Negotiation Journal, 6 (April 1990): 168.
17.
Ibid., pp. 164–172.
18.
FoegenJ.H., “An Ombudsman as Complement to the Grievance Procedure,”Labor Law Journal, 23 (May 1972): 289.
19.
Ibid., pp. 287–292.
20.
KolbDeborah M., “Corporate Ombudsman,” in Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference, Society of Professionals in Dispute Resolution (Washington, D.C.: Society of Professionals in Dispute Resolution, 1986), p. 401.
21.
FennMichaelYankelovichDaniel, “Responding to Employee Voice,” in Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference, Society of Professionals in Dispute Resolution (Washington, D.C.: Society of Professionals in Dispute Resolution, 1986), pp. 85–88.
22.
Ibid., p. 86.
23.
Aaron, op. cit.
24.
SolomonJanet Stern, “Mediation of Employee Rights Disputes,” in Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference, Society of Professionals in Dispute Resolution (Washington, D.C.: Society of Professionals in Dispute Resolution, 1986), p. 35.
25.
ShermanMark R., “Streamlined Mediation: Alternative to Litigating Discharge Disputes,”The Arbitration Journal, 46 (March 1991): 34–36.
26.
BiermanLeonardYoungbloodStuart A., “Resolving Unjust Discharge Cases: A Mediatory Approach,”The Arbitration Journal, 40 (March 1985): 52–53.
27.
LewinDavidPetersonRichard B., The Modern Grievance Procedure in the United States (Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 1988).
28.
DelaneyLewinIchniowski, op. cit.
29.
LewinPeterson, op. cit.
30.
BerenbeimRonald, Nonunion Complaint Systems: A Corporate Appraisal, Report No. 770 (New York, NY: The Conference Board, 1980); LewinDavid, “Conflict Resolution in the Nonunion Firm: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis,”Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31 (September 1987): 465–502; Lewin (1992a), op. cit.
31.
LitrellLawrence R., “Grievance Procedure and Arbitration in a Nonunion Environment: The Northrop Experience,” in SternJames L., ed., Arbitration Issues for the 1980s, Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Annual Meeting, National Academy of Arbitrators (Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs, 1982), pp. 29–39.
32.
Ibid., p. 36.
33.
CoulsonRobert, “An Informal Way to Settle Office Disputes,”Modern Office Procedures, 32 (June 1980): 182–187.
34.
McCabe, op. cit.
35.
Ibid.
36.
LewinDavid, “Conflict Resolution and Management in Contemporary Work Organizations,” in BacharachSamuel B.SeeberRonald L.WalshDavid A., eds., Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 13 (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1992b, forthcoming).
37.
ReibsteinLarry, “More Firms Use Peer Review Panels to Resolve Employees' Grievances,”The Wall Street Journal, December 3, 1986, section 2, p. 29.
38.
McCabe, op. cit.
39.
OlsonFred C., “How Peer Review Works at Control Data,”Harvard Business Review, 62 (November/December, 1984): 81–86.
Litrell, op. cit.; FioritoJackLowmanChristopherNelsonForrest D., “The Impact of Human Resource Policies on Union Organizing,”Industrial Relations, 26 (Spring 1987): 113–126.
42.
Lawler, op. cit.; SimmonsMares, op. cit.
43.
MitchellDaniel J.B.LewinDavidLawlerEdward E.III, “Alternative Pay Systems, Firm Performance, and Productivity,” in BlinderAlan S., ed., Paying for Productivity: A Look at the Evidence (Washington, D.C.: Brookings, 1990), pp. 15–94.
44.
LewinDavid, “The Future of Employee Involvement/Participation in the United States,”Labor Law Journal, 40 (August 1989): 470–475.