HirschmanAlbert O., Exit, Voice, and Loyalty (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970).
2.
FreemanRichard B.MedoffJames L., What Do Unions Do? (New York, NY: Basic Books, 1984).
3.
LewinDavidPetersonRichard B., The Modern Grievance Procedure in the United States (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1988); LewinDavid, “Dispute Resolution in the Nonunion Firm: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis,”Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31 (September 1987): 465–502; LewinDavid, “Grievance Procedures in Nonunion Workplaces: An Empirical Analysis of Usage, Dynamics, and Outcomes,”Chicago-Kent Law Review, 68 (1992b, forthcoming).
4.
This is a revised version of a paper originally presented in a Symposium on Employee Voice at the Forty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association (IRRA), New Orleans, LA, January 1992. We draw on and liberally refer to other papers presented in the IRRA Syposium by Aaron (1992), McCabe (1992), Bain (1992), and Kleiner (1992). Revised versions of the first two of these papers are contained in this issue of California Management Review.
5.
BainTrevor, “Employee Voice: A Comparative International Perspective,” paper presented to the Forty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association, New Orleans, LA, January 1992; DworkinJames B.LeeBarbara A., “The Implications of Europe 1992 for Labor-Management Relations,” in KatzHarry C., ed., The Future of Industrial Relations (Ithaca, NY: New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University, 1991), pp. 1–24.
6.
Bain, op. cit.
7.
FreemanMedoff, op. cit.
8.
SvejnarJan, “Co-determination and Productivity: Empirical Evidence From the Federal Republic of Germany,” in JonesDerek C.SvejnarJan, eds., Participatory and Self-Managed Firms (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1982), pp. 275–298.
9.
BlumenthalW.N., Codetermination in the German Steel Industry (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Industrial Relations Section, 1986).
10.
FitzroyFelix R.KraftKornelius, “Unionization, Wages, and Efficiency,”Kyklos, 38 (1985): 537–554.
11.
SchnabelClaus, “Trade Unions and Productivity: The German Evidence,”British Journal of Industrial Relations, 29 (March 1991): 15–24.
12.
KraftKornelius, “Exit and Voice in the Labor Market: An Empirical Study of Quits,”Journal of Theoretical and Institutional Economics, 142 (1986): 697–715.
13.
WilsonNicholasPeelMichael J., “The Impact of Absenteeism and Quits on Profit-Sharing and Other Forms of Employee Participation,”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 44 (July 1991): 454–468.
14.
FitzroyKraft, op. cit.
15.
WilsonPeel, op. cit.
16.
BainTrevor, “German Co-Determination and Employment Adjustments in Steel and Autos,”Columbia Journal of World Business, 18 (Spring 1983): 40–47; Bain (1992), op. cit.; Industrial Democracy in Europe International Research Group, “Participation: Formal Rules, Influence, and Involvement,”Industrial Relations, 10 (Fall 1979): 273–294.
17.
Bain (1992), op. cit,; DworkinLee, op. cit.
18.
Bain (1992), op. cit.
19.
Bain (1992), op. cit.; SternRobert N., “Participation by Representation,”Work and Occupations, 15 (November 1988): 396–442.
20.
SvejnarJan, “Relative Wage Effects of Unions, Dictatorship, and Codetermination: Economic Evidence From Germany,”The Review of Economics and Statistics, 63 (May 1981): 188–197
21.
BenelliGiuseppeLoderorClaudioLysThomas, “Labor Participation in Corporate Policy-Making Decisions: West Germany's Experience with Co-determination,”Journal of Business, 60/4 (1987): 553–575.
22.
JonesDerek C.PliskinJeffrey, “British Evidence on the Employment Effects of Profit Sharing,”Industrial Relations, 28 (Spring 1989): 276–298.
23.
JonesDerek C., “The Productivity Effects of Worker Directors and Financial Participation by Employees in the Firm: The Case of British Retail Cooperatives,”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 41 (October 1987): 79–92.
24.
CableJ.FitzroyFelix R., “Cooperation and Productivity: Some Evidence From West German Experience,”Economic Analysis and Workers' Management, 14 (1980): 163–180.
25.
Svejnar(1982), op. cit.
26.
HobsonCharles T.DworkinJames B., “West German Labor Unrest: Are Unions Losing Ground to Workers' Councils?,”Monthly Labor Review, 109 (February 1986): 46–48.
27.
KassalowEverett M., “Employee Representation on U.S. German Boards,”Monthly Labor Review, 112 (September 1989): 39–42.
28.
HammerTove H.CurrallSteven C.SternRobert N., “Worker Representation on Boards of Directors: A Study of Competing Roles,”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 44 (July 1991): 661–680.
29.
DworkinLee, op. cit.
30.
DickensLindaHartMoiraJonesMichaelWeekesBrian, “The British Experience Under a Statute Prohibiting Unjust Dismissal,”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 37 (July 1984): 497–514.
31.
See, for example, SummersClyde W., “Individual Protection Against Unjust Dismissal,”Virginia Law Review, 44/2 (1976): 481–533; PeckCharles, “Unjust Discharges From Employment: A Necessary Change in the Law,”Ohio State Law Review, 40 (Fall 1979): 678–699; StieberJack, “Employment at Will: An Issue for the 1980s,”Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting, Industrial Relations Research Association (Madison, WI: IRRA, 1984), pp. 1–13; WeilerPaul C., Governing the Workplace: The Future of Labor and Employment Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990).
32.
KruegerAlan B., “The Evolution of Unjust Dismissal Legislation in the United States,”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 44 (July 1991): 644–660.
KleinerMorris, “Employee Voice: An Economic Perspective,” paper presented to the Forty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association, New Orleans, LA, January 1992.
38.
Ibid.
39.
IchniowskiCasey, “The Effects of Grievance Activity on Productivity,”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 40 (October 1986): 75–89.
40.
KatzHarry C.KochanThomas A.GobeilleKenneth R., “Industrial Relations Performance, Economic Performance, and Quality of Working Life Programs: An Inter-plant Analysis,”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 37 (October 1987): 3–17.
41.
KatzHarry C.KochanThomas A.WeberMark R., “Assessing the Effects of Industrial Relations Systems and Efforts to Improve the Quality of Working Life on Organizational Effectiveness,”Academy of Management Journal, 28 (September 1985): 509–526.
42.
NorsworthyJ.R.ZabalaCraig A., “Worker Attitudes, Worker Behavior, and Productivity in the American Automobile Industry: 1959–1976,”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 38 (July 1985): 544–557.
43.
IchniowskiCaseyLewinDavid, “Grievance Procedures and Firm Performance,” in KleinerMorris M.BlockRichard N.RoomkinMyronSalsburgSidney W., eds., Human Resources and the Performance of the Firm (Madison, WI: Industrial Relations Research Association, 1987), pp. 159–193.
44.
Kleiner, op. cit.
45.
IchniowskiLewin, op. cit.; CappelliPeterChauvinKeith, “An Economic Model of Employee Grievances,”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45 (October 1991): 1–17.
46.
FreemanMedoff, op. cit.
47.
Aaron, op. cit.
48.
LewinPeterson, op. cit.
49.
See also, LewinDavid, “Conflict Resolution and Management in Contemporary Work Organizations: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Evidence,” in BacharachSamuel B. amd SeeberRonald L., eds., Research in Organizational Sociology, 13 (special issue, 1992a, forthcoming); PetersonRichard B.LewinDavid, “Lessons From Research on Unionized Grievance Procedures: A Critical Review and Appraisal,” (Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Institute of Industrial Relations Working Paper #210, July 1991).
50.
DelaneyJohn ThomasLewinDavidIchniowskiCasey, Human Resource Policies and Practices in American Firms, BLMR No. 137 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Labor, Bureau of Labor-Management Relations and Cooperative Programs, 1989).
51.
IchniowskiCaseyDelaneyJohn ThomasLewinDavid, “The New Human Resource Management in the U.S.: Is it Really New and is it Only Nonunion,”Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, 44 (Winter 1989): 93–117.
52.
LittrellLawrence R., “Grievance Procedure and Arbitration in a Nonunion Environment: The Northrop Experience,” in SternJames L., ed., Arbitration Issues for the 1980s, Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Annual Meeting, National Academy of Arbitrators (Washington, D.C.: Bureau of National Affairs, 1982), pp. 29–39.
53.
WestinAlan F.SalisburyStephan, Individual Rights in the Corporation (New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1980).
54.
FreedmanAudrey, The New Look in Wage Policy and Employee Relations, Report No. 856 (New York, NY: The Conference Board, 1985); FioritoJackLowmanChristopherNelsonForrest D., “The Impact of Human Resource Policies on Union Organizing,”Industrial Relations, 26 (Spring 1987): 113–126.
55.
Kleiner, op. cit.; see also, WilliamsonOliver, Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (New York, NY: Free Press, 1975).
56.
Kleiner, op. cit.
57.
BendixReinhard, Work and Authority in Industry (New York, NY: Harper and Row, 1956).
58.
JacobySanford M., Employing Bureaucracy: Managers, Unions, and the Transformation of Work in American Industry, 1900–1945 (New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1985).
59.
IchniowskiCaseyLewinDavid, “Characteristics of Grievnce Procedures: Evidence from Nonunion, Union, and Double-Breasted Businesses,”Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting, Industrial Relations Research Association (Madison, WI: IRRA, 1988), pp. 415–424; CappelliChauvin, op. cit.
60.
McCabeDouglas M.LewinDavid, “Employee Voice: A Human Resource Management Perspective,”California Management Review, 34/3 (Spring 1992).
BoroffKarenLewinDavid, “Loyalty, Voice, and Intent to Exit a Nonunion Firm: A Conceptual and Empirical Analysis,” (Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Institute of Industrial Relations Working Paper #211, August 1991).
70.
See also, BoroffKaren, “Loyalty—A Correlate of Exit, Voice, or Silence?,”Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting, Industrial Relations Research Association (Madison, WI: IRRA, 1990), pp. 304–317; BoroffKaren, “Measuring the Perceptions of the Effectiveness of a Workplace Complaint Procedure,” in SockellDonnaLewinDavidLipskyDavid B., eds., Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations, 5 (1991): 207–233.
71.
LewinDavidBoroffKarenNgAlvin, “Managerial and Nonmanagerial Employee Responses to a Dispute Resolution System: A Test of Exit, Voice, and Loyalty Theory,” UCLA Institute of Industrial Relations Working Paper #223, Los Angeles, CA (June 1992).
72.
Hirschman, op. cit.
73.
FreemanMedoff, op. cit.
74.
BrownCharlesMedoffJames L., “The Employer Size Wage Effect,”Journal of Political Economy, 97 (October 1989): 1027–1059; AllenSteven G.ClarkRobert L., “Pensions and Firm Performance,” in KleinerMorris M.BlockRichard N.RoomkinMyronSalsburgSidney W., eds., Human Resources and the Performance of the Firm (Madison, WI: Industrial Relations Research Association, 1987), pp. 195–242.
75.
LevineDavid I., “Job Characteristics and Wage Anomalies,” Haas School of Business Working Paper, University of California, Berkeley, CA (July 1991).
76.
DelaneyLewinIchniowski, op. cit.
77.
OstermanPaul, Employment Futures: Reorganization, Dislocation, and Public Policy (Cambridge: Oxford University Press, 1988).
78.
LewinDavid, “The Future of Employee Involvement/Participation in the United States,”Labor Law Journal, 40 (August 1989): 470–475; LawlerEdward E.III, High Involvement Management (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1986).