National Science Foundation. “Real Increase in 1988 Research Funds Estimated at Lowest Rate in Eleven Years,”Science Resources Studies Highlights (Washington. D.C.: National Science Foundation, 1988).
2.
KlineStephen J.KashDon E., “Technology Policy: What Should It Do?” in TeichAlbert H., ed., Technology and the Future (New York, NY: St. Martin's Press, 1993).
3.
MagnussonPaul, “Bush Just Might Buy This Plan—If No One Calls It ‘Industrial Policy’.”Business Week, April I, 1991, p. 27.
4.
HiseRichard T.McDanielStephen W., “American Competitiveness and the CEO— Who's Minding the Shop?”Sloan Management Review (Winter 1988), pp. 49–55.
5.
HornigDonald F., “The Role of Government in Scientific Innovation,” in ColesJames S., ed., Technological Innovation in the '80s (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1984) p. 55. It should be noted that Dr. Hornig recognizes one significant exception—the U.S. government role in the establishment of our world-class agro-industrial enterprise.
6.
KlineKash, op. cit.
7.
Council on Competitiveness, Gaining New Ground: Technology Priorities for America's Future (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1991).
8.
MeyerMarc H.RobertsEdward B., “Focusing Product Technology for Corporate Growth.”Sloan Management Review (Summer 1988), pp. 7–16.
9.
ReichRobert B., “Who is Us?”Harvard Business Review (January/February 1990), pp. 53–64.
10.
KimW. Chan, “Competition and the Management of Host Government Intervention,”Sloan Management Review (Spring 1987), pp. 33–39.
11.
JoinerCharles W., “Harvesting American Technology—Lessons from the Japanese Garden.”Sloan Management Review (Summer 1989), pp. 61–68.
12.
See, for example, FlenderJohn O.MorseRichard S., “The Role of New Technical Enterprises in the U.S. Economy,” in the Committee Report of the Select Committee on Small Business, United States Senate, Small Business and the Quality of American Life (Washington. D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.1977), pp. 72–90. Another source is BirchD.L., Job Creation in America: How Small Companies Put the Most People to Work (New York, NY: Free Press, 1987).
13.
RadosevichRaymond, “New Business Development from New Mexico's Federal Laboratories,” in WaltersKenneth, ed., Technology Commercialization: Innovative Alliances for Economic Development (New York, NY: Roman and Littlefield, forthcoming 1993).
14.
The advantages of these partnerships are described in BotkinJames W.MatthewsJana B., Winning Combinations: The Coming Wave of Entrepreneurial Partnerships Between Large and Small Companies (New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1992).
15.
StaleyJeffrey L., “Global Technology-Asset Management: A New Survival Skill for the 1990s,”Technology Transfer (Fall 1991), pp. 29–33.
16.
SmilorRaymond W.GibsonDavid V.AveryChristopher M., “R&D Consortia and Technology Transfer: Initial Lessons from MCC,”Technology Transfer (Spring 1989), pp. 11–22.
17.
BarberJeff, “DOE Official's Role in License Examined,”McGraw-Hill's Tech Transfer Report (June 1990), p. 4.
18.
KassiciehSuleiman K.RadosevichH. Raymond, “A Model for Technology Transfer: Group-Decision Support Systems and Electronic Meetings,”Technology Transfer (Summer 1991), pp. 43–49.
19.
Task Force on Management of Technology, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems. National Research Council, Management of Technology: The Hidden Competitive Advantage (Washington. D.C.: National Academy Press, 1987), Report Number CETS-CROSS-6, pp. 19–20.