EdquistC.Jacobsson, Flexible Automation: The Global Diffusion of New Technology in the Engineering Industry (Oxford: Blackwells, 1988); GerwinD.KolodnyH., Management of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (New York, NY: Wiley, 1992); LöwstedtJ.NorrC., Spridning av en innovation [The diffusion of innovation] (Stockholm: IMIT Publication, 1991); MansfieldE., “The Diffusion of Industrial Robots in Japan and the United States,”Research Policy, 18 (1989): 183–192.
2.
JaikumarR., “Postindustrial Manufacturing,”Harvard Business Review, 64 (November/December 1986): 69–76.
3.
MeredithJ.R.HillM.M., “Justifying New Manufacturing Systems: A Managerial Approach,”Sloan Management Review (Summer 1987), pp. 49–61.
4.
For a survey of some of the main areas of new manufacturing technology see MeredithJ.R., “The Strategic Advantage of the Factory of the Future,”California Management Review, 29/3 (Spring 1987): 27–41. For a more extensive bibliography of manufacturing technology and manufacturing strategy see SwadimassPaul M., “Manufacturing Strategy: A Selected Bibliography,”Journal of Operations Management, 8 (1989): 263–277.
5.
See, for example, HorwirchM., Technology in the New Corporation (New York, NY: Pergamon Press, 1986); MeredithJ.R., “Implementing New Manufacturing Technologies: Managerial Lessons over the FMS Life Cycle,”Interfaces, 17 (1987): 51–62; GoldB., “Computerization in Domestic and International Manufacturing,”California Management Review, 32/2 (Winter 1989): 129–143; AdlerA.S.ShenbarA., “Adapting Your Technological Base: The Organizational Challenge,”Sloan Management Review (Fall 1990). pp. 25–37; KozlowskiS.W.HattrupK., “Problems Associated with the Implementation of New Manufacturing Technologies,” paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, San Francisco (1990).
6.
HayesR.H.JaikumarR., “Manufacturing's Crisis: New Technologies, Obsolete Organizations,”Harvard Business Review, 66 (1988): 77–85.
7.
GoldB., “CAM Sets New Rules for Production,”Harvard Business Review, 62 (November/December 1982): 88–94.
8.
Meredith (1987a), op. cit., p. 27.
9.
HayesJaikumar, op. cit., p. 79.
10.
DeanJ.W.SusmanG.I., “Organizing for Manufacturable Design,”Harvard Business Review, (January/February 1989): 28–36; DeanJ.W.SnellS.A., “Integrated Manufacturing and Job Design: Moderating Effects of Organizational Inertia,”Academy of Management Journal, 34/4 (1991): 776–804.
11.
HayesJaikumar, op. cit., p. 78.
12.
HametzP.L.FryL.W., “Flexible Manufacturing Organizations: Implications for Strategy Formulation and Organization Design,”Academy of Management Review, 13/4 (1988): 627–638.
13.
KaplanR.S., “Must CIM Be Justified by Faith Alone?”Harvard Business Review, 64 (March/April 1986): 87–95; MonahanG.E.SmuntT.L., “Multilevel Decision Support System for the Financial Justification of Automated Flexible Manufacturing Systems,”Interfaces, 17 (November/December 1987): 29–40.
WaltonR.L., Innovating to Compete (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1987).
16.
Gold (1989), op. cit., p. 132–133.
17.
HayesJaikumar, op. cit.
18.
For an extensive bibliography that includes over 1500 STS published studies see van EijnattenM.F., An Anthology of the Socio-Technical System Design Paradigm (Eindhoven, Netherlands: Eindhoven University of Technology Press, 1992).
19.
PasmoreW.A., Designing Effective Organizations: The Sociotechnical System Perspective (New York, NY: Wiley, 1988).
20.
Many reports support this argument. For example, CummingsT.G., “Sociotechnical Experimentation: A Review of Sixteen Studies,” in PasmoreW.A.SherwoodJ.J., eds., Sociotechnical Systems: A Sourcebook (La Jolla, CA: University Associates, 1978); DavisL.E., “Workers and Technology: The Necessary Joint Basis For Organizational Effectiveness,”National Productivity Review, 3/1 (1983): 7–14; HannaD., Designing Organizations For High Performance (Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1988); KolodnyH.DresnerB., “Linking Arrangements and New Work Designs,”Organization Dynamics (Winter 1986), pp. 33–51.; PasmoreW.A. (1988), op. cit.; PavaC.H., “Redesigning Sociotechnical System Design: Concepts and Methods For The 1990s,”Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22/3 (1986): 201–221.; ShaniA.B.ElliottO., “Applying Sociotechnical System Design At The Strategic Apex: An Illustration,”Organization Development Journal, 6/2 (1988): 53–66.; TristE.L., “The Sociotechnical Perspective,” in Van de VenA.H.JoyceW.F., eds., Perspectives on Organization Design and Behavior, 19–75 (New York. NY: Wiley, 1982).
21.
PasmoreW.A., Designing Effective Organizations: The Sociotechnical System Perspective (New York, NY: Wiley, 1988); PavaC., Managing New Office Technology: An Organizational Strategy (New York, NY: Free Press, 1983).
SusmanG.I.ChaseR.B., “A Sociotechnical Analysis of the Integrated Factory,”The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22/3 (1986): 257–270; ShaniA.B.ElliottO., “Sociotechnical System Design in Transition,” in SikesDrexlerGrant, eds., The Emerging Practice of Organization Development (La Jolla, CA: University Associates, 1989), pp. 187–198.
24.
SusmanChase, op. cit.
25.
WoodwardJoan [Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice (London: Oxford University Press, 1965)] identified three types: Unit and batch production, mass production, and continuous process production. PerrowCharles [“A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Organizations,”American Sociological Review, 32 (1967): 194–208] distinguished between routine versus non-routine technologies. ThompsonJ.D. [Organization in Action (New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1967)] distinguished on the basis of task interdependence (mediating, long linked, intensive).
26.
Office of Technology Assessment, Computerized Manufacturing Automation: Employment, Education, and the Workplace (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Congress, 1984), Pub. OTA-CIT-235.
27.
Meredith (1987a), op. cit.
28.
MeredithJ.R.HillM.M., “Justifying New Manufacturing Systems: A Managerial Approach,”Sloan Management Review (Summer 1987), pp. 49–61.
29.
Pasmore, op. cit.
30.
BadhamR., “Computer-Aided Design, Work Organization, and the Integrated Factory,”IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 36/3 (1989): 216–226.
31.
HarperD.E., “The Future of Telecommunications,”North American Edition of Telecommunication (January 1989), pp. 27–32.
32.
MerrillsR., “How Northern Telecom Competes on Time,”Harvard Business Review (July/August 1989), pp. 108–114.
33.
LeviD.SlemC., “Technological Change Survey: Analysis of NTSC,” technical report, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA (1988).
34.
LadfordG.E., “Employee Survey Results: An Executive Summary,” technical report, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA (1988).
35.
ParthasarthyR.SethiS.P., “The Impact of Flexible Automation on Business Strategy and Organizational Structure,”Academy of Management Review, 17/1 (1992): 86–111.