SiegelIrving H.WeinbergEdgar, Labor-Management Cooperation (Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employee Research, 1982); SchusterMichael H., Union-Management Cooperation (Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employee Research, 1984); MacyBarry A.LedfordGerald E.LawlerEdward E.III, An Assessment of the Bolivar Quality of Work Life Experiment: 1972–1979 (New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience, 1982); GrynaFrank, Quality Circles, A Team Approach to Problem Solving (New York, NY: AMACOM, 1981); FisherRogerUryWilliam, Getting to Yes (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1981); and KochanThomas A.KatzHarry C.MowerNancy R., Worker Participation and American Unions: Threat or Reality? (Kalamazoo, MI: The W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, 1984), p. 14–24.
2.
See WinpisingerW.W., “In the Real World, We Have to Eat,”Viewpoint, 8/3 (1978): 2–7; LevitanSar A.JohnsonClifford M., “Labor and Management: The Illusion of Cooperation,”Harvard Business Review (September/October 1983), pp. 8–11, 16; ResimanBarbaraCompaLance, “The Case for Adversarial Unions,”Harvard Business Review (May/June 1985), pp. 22–24, 28, 30, 32, 36.
3.
Cutcher-GershenfeldJoel, “Reconceiving the Web of Labor-Management Relations,”Proceedings of the 1985 Spring Meeting of the IRRA, pp. 637–645; HealyJames J., ed., Creative Collective Bargaining (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1965).
4.
See PetersonRichard B.TracyLane, “A Behavioral Model of Problem Solving in Labour Negotiations,”British Journal of Industrial Relations, 14 (1976): 159–173; PetersonRichard B.TracyLaneCabellyAlan, “Problem Solving in Labor Negotiations: Retest of a Model,”Relations Industrielles, 36 (1981): 87–104.
5.
PetersonRichard B.TracyLane, “Problem Solving in American Collective Bargaining: A Review and Assessment,” in LipskyDavid B., ed., Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations, Vol. 2 (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1985), pp. 1–50.
6.
ChamberlainNeilKuhnJames, Collective Bargaining (New York, NY: McGraw Hill, 1965), pp. 429–430.
7.
Schuster, op. cit., pp. 1–2.
8.
WaltonRichard E.McKersieRobert B., A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations (New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1965), p. 5.
9.
Fisher and Ury, op. cit.
10.
RinghamArthur J., “Designing a Gainsharing Program to Fit a Company's Operations,”National Productivity Review (Spring 1984), pp. 131–144.
11.
HerrickNeil Q., “QWL: An Alternative to Traditional Public-Sector Management Systems,”National Productivity Review (Winter 1983–84), p. 56.
12.
KatzHarry C.KochanThomas A.GobeilleK.R., “Industrial Relations Performance, Economic Performance and Quality of Working Life Programs: An Inter-Plant Analysis,”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, (1983): 3–17.
13.
SulznerGeorge T., “The Impact of Labor-Management Cooperation Committees on Personnel Policies and Practices at Twenty Federal Bargaining Units,”Journal of Collective Negotiations, (1982): 37–45.
14.
KochanKatzMower, op. cit., pp. 33–38.
15.
Schuster, op. cit.
16.
KochanKatzMower, op. cit., 26–32.
17.
Healy, op. cit.
18.
KottnerRobert, “Sharing Power at Eastern Airlines,”Harvard Business Review (November/December 1985), pp. 91–101.
19.
Schuster, op. cit.
20.
DiltsDavid A.DeitschClarence R., “Absentee Workers Back on the Job: The Case of GM,”Business Horizons (March/April 1986), pp. 46–51.
21.
Herrick, op. cit.
22.
BurtonDaniel F.Jr.HewlettSylvia Ann, “Labor Management Relations and Productivity: A Framework for Success,”National Productivity Review (Spring 1983), pp. 185–194.
23.
BrownStanley J., “The Japanese Approach to Labor Relations: Can It Work in America?”Personnel (April 1987), pp. 20–29.
24.
BelsieLaurent, “GM-UAW Saturn Pact May Signal New Era in Carmaking,”The Christian Science Monitor, July 29, 1985, pp. 3–4.
25.
FischerBen, “Taking Combat Out of Labor Relations,”Business Week, September 21, 1981, p. 17.