See FreemanR. Edward, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Boston, MA: Pitman, 1984).
2.
The public affairs function was initially investigated by the Boston University Public Affairs Research Institute. See MurrayE.A.Jr., “The Public Affairs Function: Report on a Large Scale Research Project,” in PrestonL., ed., Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Vol. 4 (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1982), pp. 129–155; and PostJ.E.MurrayE.A.Jr.DickieR.B.MahonJ.F., “Managing the Public Affairs Function,”California Management Review, 26/1 (1983): 135–150. For more recent work on the public affairs function, see FleisherC.S.HoewingR.L., “Strategically Managing Corporate External Relations: New Challenges and Opportunities,”Journal of Strategic Change1/5 (1992): 287–29; and LennD. JeffreyBrennerSteven N.BurkeLeeDodd-McCueDianeFleisherCraig S.LadLawrence J.PalmerDavid R.RogersKathryn S.WaddockSandra A.WokutchRichard E., “Managing Corporate Public Affairs and Government Relations: U.S. Multinational Corporations in Europe,”Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 14 (1993): 103–138; FleisherCraig S. provides an interesting historical perspective on the development of the public affairs function in “The Study of Corporate Public Affairs: A Methodological Review, Analysis, and Prospectus,” in WaddockS., ed., The 1992 Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society, 1992 IABS Annual Meeting, pp. 86–96.
3.
PrestonLee E.PostJames E., Private Management and Public Policy: The Principle of Public Responsibility (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1975).
4.
See SmithCraig, “The New Corporate Philanthropy,”Harvard Business Review (May/June 1994), pp. 105–116; and FleisherLenn, op. cit., for discussion of the shifts toward strategic emphasis apparent in public affairs.
5.
Basic research on corporate community involvement was undertaken by BurkeLeeLogsdonJeanne M.MitchellWillReinerMarthaVogelDavid, “Corporate Community Involvement in the San Francisco Bay Area,”California Management Review, 28/3 (Spring 1986): 122–141, which shows different levels of involvement by companies of different size and maturity. The strategic perspective on philanthropic activity is provided in LogsdonJeanne M.ReingerMarthaBurkeLee, “Corporate Philanthropy: Strategic Responses to the Firm's Stakeholders,”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 19/2 (Summer 1990): 93–109.
6.
PostJames, “The Corporation and Public Policy: Issues for the '90s,”Journal of Organization Change Management, 4/1 (1991): 7–21.
7.
HarveyJames W.McCrohanKevin F., “Changing Conditions for Fund Raising and Philanthropy,” in Van TilJonAssociates, eds., Critical Issues in American Philanthropy (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1990) .
8.
AsinofA., “Corporate Charity Peaks as Companies Rethink Their Giving,”Wall Street Journal, April 30, 1987.
9.
HarveyMcCrohan, op. cit.
10.
VaradarajanP.R.MenonA., “Cause Related Marketing: A Coalignment of Marketing Strategy and Corporate Philanthropy,”Journal of Marketing, 52 (1988): 23–30.
11.
CoxM., “Corporate Giving is Flat, and the Future Looks Bleaker,”Wall Street Journal, October 17, 1988.
12.
Ibid.
13.
HarveyMcCrohan, op. cit.
14.
KanterR.M., When Giants Learn to Dance: Mastering the Challenges of Strategy, Management, and Careers in the 1990s (New York, NY: Simon & Schuster, 1989).
15.
See for example DerberCharlesSchwartzWilliam, “Towards a Theory of Worker Participation,”Sociological Inquiry, 53/10 (Winter 1983).
16.
ZuboffS., In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power (New York, NY: Basic Books, Inc., 1988).
17.
See, e.g., BrocknerJ., “Threat of Future Layoffs, Self-Esteem, and Survivor's Reactions: Evidence from the Laboratory and the Field,”Strategic Management Journal, 14 (Summer 1993):153–166; and NoerDavid, “Layoff Survivor Sickness: A New Challenge for Supervisors,”Supervisory Management, 35/3 (March 1990).
18.
JohnstonWilliam B.PackerArnold H., Workforce 2000: Work and Workers for the Twenty-First Century (Indianapolis, IN: Hudson Institute, 1987).
19.
PrahaladC.K.HamelG., “The Core Competence of the Corporation,”Harvard Business Review (May/June 1990), pp. 79–91.
20.
OsborneD.GaeblerT., Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1992).