CullitonJames C., “Age of Synthesis,”Harvard Business Review, XI:4 (Sept.-Oct. 1962), 181.
2.
For a representative sample of current thinking in this area, please see the following references: EwellJames M., “How to Organize for a Total System,”Systems and Procedures, XII:6 (Nov.-Dec. 1961), 4–8; JohnsonRichard A., The Theory and Management of Systems (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1963); McDonoughAdrian M., Information Economics and Management Systems (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1963); NeuschelRichard F., Management by System (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1960); GallegherJames D., Management Information Systems and The Computer, American Management Association, Research Study Series, No. 51 (New York: 1961); PutmanArnold O., Unified Operations Management (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1963).
EwellJames M., “How to Organize for a Total System,” loc. cit., 6.
5.
ChaneGeorge W., “Centralized Administrative Management; the Need, the Promise, the Challenge,”Shaping a New Concept of Administrative Management, American Management Association (New York: 1961), p. 12.
6.
SmithJames W., “A General Management Computer System,”Computer Based Management for Information and Control, American Management Association, Management Bulletin 36 (New York: 1963), pp. 12–13.
7.
ForresterJay W., Industrial Dynamics (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1961), p. vii.
8.
AlexanderSamuel N., “A Progress Report,”Office Management Series No. 144, American Management Association (New York: 1956), p. 6.
9.
MilroyNeil, “The Disintegration of an Information System,”The Canadian Chartered Accountant (May 1963).
10.
McDonoughAdrian M., Information Economics and Management Systems, loc. cit., p. 14.
11.
See KozmetskyGeorgeKircherPaul, Electronic Computers and Management Control (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1956), pp. 172–173, for comments regarding the inclusion of informal information within a formal system of communication.
12.
See SimonH.GuetzkowH.KozmetskyG.TyndallG., Centralization v. Decentralization in Organizing the Controller's Department (New York: Controllership Foundation, Inc., 1954).
13.
For illustrative example of requirements of a management information system, see: EvansM. K.HayneL. R., “Master Plan for Information System,”Harvard Business Review, XL:I (1962), 92–98.
14.
GeislerM. A.StegerW. A., “How to Plan for Management in New Systems,”Harvard Business Review, XL:5 (1962), 103–110.
15.
For a detailed description, see General Information Manual Management Operating System for Manufacturing Industries, International Business Machines Corporation (1960).
16.
For a detailed description, see KleinH. E., “Production's New Brew: Instant Data,”Dun's Review and Modern Industry, LXXXII:4 (Oct. 1963), 38–113.
17.
CreamMartin J., “The Total-Integration Approach in Business Systems for R & S,”Control Through Information, American Management Association, Management Bulletin 24, pp. 28–36.
18.
SmithTheodore A., “From Burden to Opportunity: The Revolution in Data Processing,”The Changing Dimensions of Official Management, American Management Association, Management Report 41 (New York: 1960), pp. 27–28.
19.
ForresterJ. W., “Industrial Dynamics: A Major Breakthrough for Decision Makers,”Harvard Business Review, XXXVI:4 (1958), 39. Additional insight may be obtained by reviewing the latest developments in industrial dynamics as reported by RobertsE. B., “New Directions in Industrial Dynamics,”Industrial Management Review, VI:1 (Fall 1964).
20.
See, for example, KagdisJ.LacknerM. R., “A Management Control Systems Simulation Model,”Management Technology, III:2 (Dec. 1963), 145–159.
21.
“Some Reflections on Computers and History,”Bell Telephone Magazine, Spring 1964, p. 11.
22.
LeavittH. J., “Dealing with Management Obsolescence,”Computer-Based Management for Information and Control, American Management Association, Management Bulletin 31 (New York: 1964), p. 51.